Open Access

A conserved cluster of three PRD-class homeobox genes (homeobrain, rx and orthopedia) in the Cnidaria and Protostomia

  • Maureen E Mazza1,
  • Kevin Pang2,
  • Adam M Reitzel1, 3,
  • Mark Q Martindale2 and
  • John R Finnerty1Email author
Contributed equally

DOI: 10.1186/2041-9139-1-3

Received: 1 December 2009

Accepted: 5 July 2010

Published: 5 July 2010



Homeobox genes are a superclass of transcription factors with diverse developmental regulatory functions, which are found in plants, fungi and animals. In animals, several Antennapedia (ANTP)-class homeobox genes reside in extremely ancient gene clusters (for example, the Hox, ParaHox, and NKL clusters) and the evolution of these clusters has been implicated in the morphological diversification of animal bodyplans. By contrast, similarly ancient gene clusters have not been reported among the other classes of homeobox genes (that is, the LIM, POU, PRD and SIX classes).


Using a combination of in silico queries and phylogenetic analyses, we found that a cluster of three PRD-class homeobox genes (Homeobrain (hbn), Rax (rx) and Orthopedia (otp)) is present in cnidarians, insects and mollusks (a partial cluster comprising hbn and rx is present in the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens). We failed to identify this 'HRO' cluster in deuterostomes; in fact, the Homeobrain gene appears to be missing from the chordate genomes we examined, although it is present in hemichordates and echinoderms. To illuminate the ancestral organization and function of this ancient cluster, we mapped the constituent genes against the assembled genome of a model cnidarian, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis, and characterized their spatiotemporal expression using in situ hybridization. In N. vectensis, these genes reside in a span of 33 kb with the same gene order as previously reported in insects. Comparisons of genomic sequences and expressed sequence tags revealed the presence of alternative transcripts of Nv-otp and two highly unusual protein-coding polymorphisms in the terminal helix of the Nv-rx homeodomain. A population genetic survey revealed the Rx polymorphisms to be widespread in natural populations. During larval development, all three genes are expressed in the ectoderm, in non-overlapping territories along the oral-aboral axis, with distinct temporal expression.


We report the first evidence for a PRD-class homeobox cluster that appears to have been conserved since the time of the cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor, and possibly even earlier, given the presence of a partial cluster in the placozoan Trichoplax. Very similar clusters comprising these three genes exist in Nematostella and diverse protostomes. Interestingly, in chordates, one member of the ancestral cluster (homeobrain) has apparently been lost, and there is no linkage between rx and orthopedia in any of the vertebrates. In Nematostella, the spatial expression of these three genes along the body column is not colinear with their physical order in the cluster but the temporal expression is, therefore, using the terminology that has been applied to the Hox cluster genes, the HRO cluster would appear to exhibit temporal but not spatial colinearity. It remains to be seen whether the mechanisms responsible for the evolutionary conservation of the HRO cluster are the same mechanisms responsible for cohesion of the Hox cluster and other ANTP-class homeobox clusters that have been widely conserved throughout animal evolution.


Gene clusters have been crucially important in the evolution of animals because close physical linkage affects genetic recombination, molecular evolution and gene regulation [17]. For example, clustering can contribute to coordinated transcriptional regulation of linked genes if the local chromatin structure affects several genes in the same chromosomal neighborhood or if shared regulatory elements drive the expression of neighboring genes, such as the gene clusters of the human cardiac transcriptome [8].

Gene clusters are also important tools for reconstructing genome evolution. The clustering of related genes can reveal the mechanism underlying the expansion of a gene family, and conserved gene clusters define homologous chromosomal segments that may be compared across species [921].

Homeobox gene clusters, in particular, have received a great deal of study. Since the pioneering studies by Ed Lewis and co-workers on the Antennapedia (ANTP) and Bithorax complexes of Drosophila[22], comparative genomic studies have revealed (i) that certain homeobox clusters are widely conserved throughout the animal kingdom, (ii) that clustering may influence gene expression and (iii) that clustering may be conserved by stabilizing selection if disrupting the cluster has deleterious effects on the spatiotemporal expression of linked genes [2328].

All of the aforementioned homeobox clusters consist of ANTP-class genes [29]. Based on published studies, conserved clusters of non-ANTP class homeobox genes that date from the time of the bilaterian common ancestor do not appear to be as common, although less ancient clusters of PRD (PRD) class genes have been identified. A cluster of several Rhox genes that function during gametogenesis appears to be restricted to rodents [15]. A cluster of three Otx genes has been identified in the sea anemone Nematostella, but this cluster appears to be restricted to anthozoan cnidarians [30].

The widespread occurrence of conserved ANTP-class clusters could reflect the unique early history of this class; recent studies suggest that the various ANTP-class gene clusters can all be traced to four ancient arrays (extended Hox, ParaHox, NKL and EHG box [10]) or even to a single ancestral 'metaHox' cluster [9]. Different elements of the ancestral linkage arrangements could have been conserved in different animal lineages. The non-ANTP homeobox genes may never have been organized in metaclusters, so the retention of subclusters would not have been possible. Alternatively, the apparent paucity of evolutionarily conserved non-ANTP homeobox clusters may simply reflect a search bias; the effort to identify clusters of Hox-related genes has spanned about 20 years and has involved dozens of laboratories. A comparable effort to identify clusters of non-ANTP homeobox genes has not yet been undertaken; however, conserved clusters of Iroquois (irx) genes have been identified in arthropods and vertebrates [21]. The insect-crustacean ancestor is thought to have possessed a cluster of two irx genes, whereas a cluster of three irx genes is thought to have been present in the common ancestor of vertebrates [21]. It is not yet clear whether a cluster of irx genes was already present in the protostome-deuterostome ancestor, or whether clusters arose independently in arthropods and vertebrates.

A cluster of three PRD-class homeobox genes (Homeobrain (hbn), Rax (rx) and Orthopedia (otp)) has been reported in Drosophila[31]. These three genes are clustered within a span of ~38 kb on chromosome 2, and they exhibit very similar spatiotemporal expression. All three genes are involved in patterning specific regions of the embryonic brain. To date, a comparable cluster has not yet been described in other species.

In this report, we describe the hbn-rx-otp cluster in the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. The Nematostella cluster spans only ~33.5 kb and the relative order of the genes is the same as in Drosophila, although the transcriptional orientation of orthopedia is reversed. We also report the conservation of all or part of this cluster in other protostomes including a mollusk and a number of insects (for example, mosquito, honeybee and flour beetle), suggesting that (i) this cluster was present in the cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor and (ii) linkage between these genes may be under strong stabilizing selection in some lineages. In the sea anemone, in situ hybridization reveals that all three genes are expressed in the ectoderm in non-overlapping territories along the oral-aboral axis. NvHbn is expressed during early gastrula stages around the blastopore (future mouth), and expression persists in the ectoderm around the base of the tentacles into the juvenile polyp stage. NvRx is expressed in individual cells in the aboral ectoderm, and is first expressed in mid gastrula stages. NvOtp expression first becomes apparent in the larva, in the ectodermal layer of the pharynx. Thus, in Nematostella, the expression of these clustered genes is consistent with temporal but not spatial colinearity.

Materials and methods

Retrieval of Nematostella PRD-class homeodomain genes

In total, 33 PRD-class homeobox genes were previously identified in the Nematostella genome [32] by conducting BLAST searches of a draft genome assembly (available at StellaBase; http://​www.​stellabase.​org/​[33]). Phylogenetic analysis of homeodomain sequences by Bayesian and neighbor-joining methods identified single representatives of the homeobrain (HBN_Nv079), orthopedia (OTP_Nv047) and rx (RX_Nv129) families in Nematostella[32]. Subsequently, we designed gene-specific primers to amplify the 3' and 5' ends of the hbn, otp and rx transcripts from cDNA (Table 1). Overlapping 5' and 3' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) fragments were conceptually spliced to reconstruct complete transcripts. In addition, hbn, otp and rx transcripts were also identified among 150,000 Nematostella expressed sequence tags (ESTs) sequenced as part of the genome-sequencing project recently completed by the Joint Genome Institute [34]. Once the full-length transcripts were assembled, the longest open reading frames (ORFs) in frame with the highly conserved homeodomain were inferred using MacVector V.7.2.3 (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Table 1

Primers used to amplify RACE products and characterize Rx polymorphism.




Sequence 5' → 3'


















































RACE = rapid amplification of cDNA ends.

Retrieval of PRD-class homeodomains from other taxa

Human and fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) homeodomains from the PRD class were taken from a previous study [32]. We searched for hbn, rx and otp homeodomains in the partially or wholly sequenced genomes of four additional vertebrates (Mus musculus, Gallus gallus, Xenopus tropicalis and Danio rerio), four non-vertebrate deuterostomes (Ciona intestinalis, Branchiostoma floridae, Saccoglossus kowalevskii and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus), three additional insects (Anopheles gambiae, Apis mellifera and Tribolium castaneum), one nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans), one mollusk (Lottia gigantea), one annelid (Capitella teleta) and a placozoan (Trichoplax adhaerens). Database searches were conducted via Entrez http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​gquery/​gquery.​fcgi using gene names (orthopedia, rx/rax, homeobrain), and similarity searches were performed using the tBLASTn and BLASTp search algorithms. The homeodomains of hbn, otp and rx from Nematostella, human and fruit fly were used as the query sequences. Sequences that matched the query sequence were then subjected to reciprocal tBLASTn and/or reciprocal BLASTp similarity searches against the genome from which the query sequence was derived. We formally tested for orthology with phylogenetic analyses (see below).

Determination of gene linkage and gene structure

Predicted homeobox sequences for Nematostella hbn, otp and rx were mapped to the publicly available assembly of the Nematostella genome (DOE-Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Nematostella vectensis genome assembly 1.0; http://​genome.​jgi-psf.​org/​Nemve1/​Nemve1.​home.​html) using BLASTn to determine whether the hbn, rx and otp loci of Nematostella are linked as in Drosophila[31]. Gene structures were determined by mapping transcripts for hbn, rx and otp against the genome. To identify possible non-homeodomain genes that might be closely linked to hbn, rx and otp, the regions flanking these genes were compared against the RefSeq database using BLASTx (V.2.2.15).

Identification of homeobrain-rx-orthopedia clusters in other taxa

The genomic organization of the hbn, rx and otp cluster in Drosophila has been described previously [31]. In other species in which two or three of these PRD-class genes were identified, the genes were mapped to the corresponding assembled genome to determine if they might be linked. The level of coverage for different assemblies varies widely, from completed genome assemblies for human, mouse, fruit fly and nematode, to assemblies at the level of scaffolds, contigs and linkage groups for numerous other animals. Therefore, we have uncertainty for linkage of some genes that are present in the genome because current assemblies limit absolute characterization of location. For species in which at least two of the three genes matched the same scaffold, linkage group or chromosome, we determined the relative position and transcriptional direction of each gene from the cluster.

Phylogenetic analysis

Hbn, otp, rx and other PRD-class homeodomain sequences were aligned using a web implementation of the computer program Muscle [35]. The default parameters were used, and the alignment algorithm did not introduce any alignment gaps. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the neighbor-joining method as implemented in the computer package Phylip (V.3.61; [36]). In total, 111 PRD-class homeodomains were used in the phylogenetic analysis, including 33 from Nematostella, 39 from human and 24 from fruit fly, which had been identified in a previous study [32]. Human and fruit fly homeodomain families comprising multiple invariant or nearly invariant homeodomains were pared to a single representative. Select homeodomains were added to provide broader representation from deuterostomes and protostomes (Deuterostomia: Branchiostoma floridae (otp, rx), Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (otp, rx, hbn), Saccoglossus kowalevskii (otp, rx); Protostomia: Caenorhabditis elegans (rx), Patella vulgata (otp), Platynereis dumerilii (rx) and Capitella teleta (hbn). Distalless and hox1 homeodomains from Drosophila melanogaster and Branchiostoma floridae were included as outgroups. Homeodomain sequences and accession numbers for homeobrain, otp and rx are provided in Figure 1. Sequences and accession numbers for the other PRD-class homeodomains used in the phylogenetic analysis are available from Ryan et al.[32]. Pairwise distances between homeodomains were calculated using the PAM distance matrix. Support for individual nodes was assessed using 1,000 replicates of the bootstrap [36]. Amino acid substitutions were localized to particular branches on the phylogeny using MacClade V.4 [37].
Figure 1

Alignment of octapeptide regions, homeodomains and OAR domains from representative hbn , otp and rx genes of cnidarians, protostomes and deuterostomes. Homeodomain sequences are aligned against the Drosophila antennapedia homeodomain. Nematostella, human and fruit fly representatives were taken from Ryan et al. [32]. Homeodomains from additional taxa were identified by similarity searches (tBLASTn and BLASTp) conducted through the BLAST interface at National Center for Biotechnology Information (see Methods) and at respective genome assemblies available through the Joint Genome Institute. Abbreviations for taxa are as follows: (cnidarians: Acropora millepora (Acm), Hydra magnipapillata (Hym), Nematostella vectensis (Nev); placozoan: Trichoplax adhaerens (Tra); protostome bilaterians: Aedes aegypti (Aea), Anopheles gambiae (Ang), Apis mellifera (Apm), Caenorhabditis elegans (Cae), Capitella teleta (Cap), Lottia gigantea (Log), Tribolium castaneum (Trc); deuterostome bilaterians: Branchiostoma floridae (Brf), Ciona intestinalis (Cii), Danio rerio (Dar), Gallus gallus (Gag), Homo sapiens (Hos), Mus musculus (Mum), Saccoglossus kowalevskii (Sak), Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stp), Xenopus laevis (Xel)). The octapeptide [72, 73] and/or the OAR domain [51, 75] are indicated when identified. Two different versions of the Rx homeodomain of Nematostella are shown, and the polymorphic residues are highlighted.

Population genetic analysis of polymorphisms in the homeodomain of Rx

To confirm the existence and determine the geographic distribution of two unusual polymorphisms at positions 52 and 59 within the homeodomain of Nematostella Rx, we designed primers to amplify a 585 bp fragment of the gene (Table 1). PCR was carried out using 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 1 × Mg-free PCR buffer, 1.7 mM MgCl2, 0.67 mM dNTPs, 1 μm of each primer and approximately 5 ng genomic DNA in 20 μl reactions. Thermal cycling consisted of denaturation for 5 minutes at 94LC, followed by 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C and 1 minute at 72°C, with a final extension of 15 minutes at 72°C. PCR products were directly sequenced (RX_for; Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea). All polymorphisms were verified by eye.

In situ hybridization

Digoxygenin-labeled riboprobes were generated from 3' RACE products for each gene (homeobrain, 749 nt; orthopedia, 1556 nt; rx, 1419 nt). Each probe included a portion of the homeobox, plus a region of highly divergent coding sequence downstream of the homeobox and the 3' untranslated region (UTR). Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed on embryos and larvae using published protocols [38]. Stringent hybridization conditions were employed (65°C for 20-44 hours using probe concentrations of 1.0 ng/μl).


Nematostella Otp, Rx and Hbn transcripts and gene structure

Using RACE PCR, we cloned and annotated full transcripts for otp, rx and hbn from Nematostella (accession numbers HM004556-8). In addition, we queried the EST databases for Nematostella to further annotate these genes and to identify non-synonymous polymorphisms in each gene.


The otp transcript is 1901 nucleotides long, and encodes a predicted protein of 291 amino acids. When mapped to the genomic sequence, this transcript spans 9587 nucleotides, including four exons (see Additional file 1). We identified two putative full-length otp transcripts that encode different splice variants in Nematostella. Comparing the two splice variants of the Nematostella otp gene, one lacked a highly conserved transcriptional repression domain that was present in the other and that is typical of otp orthologs from other taxa. Neither splice variant that we have identified encodes an OAR (otp, aristaless and rax) domain. However, a highly conserved version of this domain is predicted to be encoded by a stretch of nucleotides that is located immediately downstream and in frame with exon 3 (see Additional file 1, boxed sequence). The predicted OAR motif of Nematostella Otp is highly conserved relative to deuterostome sequences; in fact, it is identical to both the human and sea urchin sequences at 15 of 16 residues. By contrast, in protostome orthopedia proteins, only the central core of the OAR domain appears to be conserved (for example, SIAALRRRA in Drosophila), or the OAR domain appears to have been lost entirely (for example, in Aedes aegypti or Anopheles gambiae). Given this degree of sequence conservation, we predict that Nematostella expresses at least one additional Otp splice variant that includes this OAR domain. Whereas other reported orthopedia proteins lack an octapeptide domain upstream of the homeodomain, the Nematostella gene encodes a stretch of eight residues upstream of the homeodomain that shares five out of eight residues with the octapeptide of deuterostome Rx proteins (HSIxxILx; Figure 1).


The Nematostella rx transcript we assembled using RACE is 1792 nucleotides long and it encodes a predicted protein 266 amino acids long (see Additional file 2). It extends over a 4972-nucleotide region of the genome, comprising three exons (see Additional file 2). There are three noteworthy regions of similarity between the rx proteins of Nematostella and bilaterians: the homeodomain, the octapeptide and the OAR domain (Figure 1). In the homeodomain, Nematostella is identical to both human and fruit fly at 90% of residues (54/60). Among PRD-class homeodomains, the presence of a valine at residue 43 appears to be a synapomorphy of the rx family, and this trait is shared by all the rx sequences in our dataset. The rx family is also characterized by arginine-alanine at positions 18-19 of the homeodomain. This is seen in all taxa except the coral Acropora millepora, which has a glutamine at position 18 [29, 32, 39, 40]. The sea anemone is also identical to both human and fruit fly at six of seven residues in the octapeptide. Within the OAR domain, Nematostella and human are identical at 13 of 16 residues, and Nematostella and Drosophila are identical at 14 of 16 residues (Figure 1).

We identified four additional EST sequences for Nematostella rx, two that were previously deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (CAGN10625 and DV088198) and two that were generated by the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) as part of the Nematostella genome sequencing initiative (2664141-1 and 2664141-2). One of the EST sequences (DV088198) does not encode the complete OAR motif, instead producing a predicted protein 24 residues shorter than the other transcripts (see Additional file 2). Comparison of the genome assembly, our RACE product and these four ESTs revealed 28 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, including six that result in a change to the protein sequence (Additional file 2). Two of the polymorphic amino acid positions reside within helix 3 of the homeodomain, the so-called 'DNA-binding helix' (Figure 1; see Additional file 2): an A/G polymorphism that results in an amino acid change from arginine (R) to lysine (K) at position 52, and a C/G polymorphism results in an amino acid substitution from glutamine (Q) to glutamic acid (E) at position 59, an amide to acidic amino acid. Both the possession of lysine at position 52 and glutamic acid at position 59 are unique within the Rx family (Figure 1). In fact, the possession of a lysine at position 52 is very unusual for PRD-class homeodomains in general; of the 111 PRD-class homeodomains included in our phylogenetic analysis, the only other sequence with a lysine at this position is the Nematostella DMBXd homeodomain. Over the entire PRD class, the possession of glutamic acid at position 59 is not as uncommon. The Pax4/6 family exhibits glutamic acid at this position, as do three other Nematostella PRD-class homeodomains (DMBXb, NVHD_101 and NVHD_148).

To verify the existence of the two nonsynonymous polymorphisms identified in EST sequences (see above) in natural populations and to begin characterizing their geographic distribution, we sequenced a fragment of the rx gene from 95 individual animals collected throughout the range of the species (see Additional file 3). At position 52, the phylogenetically unusual lysine variant is relatively rare, accounting for only 15.16% of all alleles, but it does exhibit a broad geographic distribution, being found in seven different estuaries from both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America. However, despite the wide distribution of the K allele, KK homozygotes were only recovered in a single location, Kingsport in Nova Scotia. The apparently limited geographic distribution of this genotype is interesting considering that KR heterozygotes accounted for more than a quarter of all individual animals assayed (RR = 71.58%, RK = 26.16%, KK = 2.11%). At position 59, the glutamine variant accounted for 96.28% of all alleles. Despite its overall rarity (3.72%), the glutamic acid variant was recovered in four widely separated estuaries in New Jersey, Maryland, California and Washington, although no EE homozygotes were recovered in any individual (QQ = 92.55%, QE = 7.45%, EE = 0.00%).


The Nematostella homeobrain transcript that we assembled using RACE encompasses three exons (see Additional file 4). Similar to otp and rx, an intron interrupts the homeodomain between positions 46 and 47. The third exon, 647 nucleotides in length, encodes the final 14 amino acids of the homeodomain plus an OAR motif, which is located near the carboxy terminus of the predicted protein. The Nematostella homeobrain protein has high similarity to insect orthologs within the homeodomain region but very little similarity could be detected elsewhere. For example, the homeodomain is identical to its Drosophila ortholog at 95% of residues (57/60). Interestingly, the sequence identity between Nematostella and Drosophila exceeds the sequence identity between Nematostella and its fellow cnidarian, Hydra magnipapillata (83%; 53 of 60 identical residues). This suggests that the Hydra homeodomain has evolved relatively quickly.

Phylogenetic analysis

The maximum-likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) analyses performed here reinforce the conclusions of Ryan et al.[32]: Nematostella hbn, otp and rx sequences group with putative orthologs from bilaterian taxa with a moderate to high level of bootstrap support (Figure 2). The Nematostella hbn homeodomain is nested within a clade that also includes hbn sequences from multiple animals including protostomes (for example, Capitella and Drosophila), Trichoplax and two deuterostomes (Strongylocentrotus and Saccoglossus). Bootstrap support for this clade is moderate (ML = 77, NJ = 64). We were unable to recover a clear hbn ortholog from any chordate model system [41]. Our phylogenetic analyses recovered a monophyletic grouping for predicted rx orthologs from all species sampled except the most basal member queried, the placozoan Trichoplax. Similar to the hbn clade, bootstrap support was moderate for rx orthologs (ML = 43, NJ = 80). Finally, we identified putative otp orthologs from all species expect the nematode C. elegans (ML = 66, NJ = 98).
Figure 2

Neighbor-joining phylogeny of PRD class genes based on homeodomain sequences. Pairwise distances between homeodomains were calculated using the PAM matrix in the computer program protdist in the Phylip package (Phylogenetic Inference Package, V.3.61). Abbreviations for taxa are as in Figure 1. Numbers above nodes indicate the percentage of 1000 bootstrap replicates in which the given node was recovered in a neighbor-joining analysis. The tree is rooted using Hox1 and distalless homeodomains from the lancelet and the fruit fly.

The Homeobrain-Rax-Orthopedia cluster

The Nematostella hbn, otp and rx transcripts map to a single scaffold in the publicly available assembly of the Nematostella genome (jgi scaffold 62; DOE-JGI Nematostella vectensis genome assembly V.1.0; http://​genome.​jgi-psf.​org/​Nemve1/​Nemve1.​home.​html). The entire scaffold is 1,036,593 nucleotides long, and the cluster is located roughly 225,000 nucleotides from the nearest end of the scaffold. The rx locus intervenes between the otp and hbn loci. Otp and rx are encoded on one strand, whereas hbn is encoded on the opposite strand (Figure 3). The entire three-gene cluster spans 34,246 nucleotides (from the first nucleotide in the predicted 5' exon of orthopedia to the first nucleotide in the predicted 5' exon of homeobrain). The distance between the predicted stop codon of hbn and the predicted stop codon of rx is only 3,437 nucleotides (Figure 3). The intergenic distance between otp and the predicted transcription start site of rx is 12,158 nucleotides. Using BLASTx we searched for predicted genes positioned in the intergenic regions within the otp-rx-hbn cluster. No significant hits were recovered in the smaller intergenic region between rx and hbn (E < 10). We identified one position of moderate similarity to other proteins in the region between otp and rx (~ 1 × 10-6). Upon closer inspection there were no consistent proteins, regions or domains identified from these results, and the hits appeared as spurious matches. Based on the current assembly of the Nematostella genome, the nearest annotated genes bracketing the cluster are a predicted ferredoxin (JGI: 101894) located 16.6 kb from otp and a predicted gene similar to RIKEN (JGI: 242384) located 5.8 kb from hbn.
Figure 3

Organization of the homeobrain-rx-orthopedia cluster of Nematostella. Homeobrain orthopedia and rx ESTs map to a ~35 kb region within a single scaffold 1,036,593 nucleotides long in the Joint Genome Institute's assembly of the Nematostella genome (scaffold 062, Joint Genome Institute Nematostella vectensis genome portal, V.1.0). Arrows above the cluster indicate the transcriptional orientation of each gene. The nucleotide length of each intron, exon and intergenic region is indicated below the cluster.

The genomic organization of the Drosophila homeobrain cluster has been described previously [31]. The fruit fly cluster exhibits the same relative gene order as the Nematostella cluster, but the intergenic distances are greater and the transcriptional orientation of otp is reversed. The intergenic distance between hbn and rx is approximately 17.0 kb in the Drosophila cluster, whereas the intergenic distance between rx and otp is approximately 21.0 kb (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Phylogenetic distribution of the Otp - Rx - Hbn cluster. Several sequenced metazoan genomes were searched for evidence of linkage between orthopedia, rx and homeobrain. The genomic organization of the fruit fly homeobrain related gene was previously reported identified by Walldorf et al. [31]. Predicted linkage of these three genes was determined for insects (mosquito, honeybee, flour beetle), chordates (vertebrates, amphioxus, ascidian), sea urchin, two lophotrochozoans (limpet, polychaete annelid), sea anemone and placozoan by querying the available genome sequences using the annotated/predicted gene sequences for each gene (this study). Solid lines between genes represent linkage on a single chromosome, scaffold or contig. Approximate distance (kb between genes) is noted above each line, and the relative transcriptional orientation of each gene is indicated by the direction of the arrow (the arrow points from 5' to 3'). Question marks indicate uncertain linkage. Genes confirmed to be on different chromosomes or genomic scaffolds are represented by squares with no interconnecting lines.

Other animal genomes in which otp, rx and hbn genes have been identified or predicted were analyzed for evidence of gene linkage. A homeobrain cluster was identified in the sequenced genomes of three additional insects: Anopheles gambiae (mosquito), Apis mellifera (honeybee) and Tribolium castaneum (flour beetle). In honeybee and flour beetle, the cluster organization is similar to that of Drosophila: the clusters have the same gene order (otp-rx-hbn), the genes exhibit the same transcriptional orientations and the intergenic distances are comparable (Figure 4). In the mosquito cluster, the gene order and scale are different, with rx linked to otp across a span of approximately 109 kb, and otp linked to hbn across a span of approximately 386 kb. In addition, there are a number of genes located in the intergenic spaces between these Paired class genes. For example, a predicted ATP-synthase-like gene is located between rx and otp, and a calcium/calmodulin protein kinase is located between otp and hbn. We also identified the three-member homeobrain cluster in the limpet Lottia. Interestingly, the gene order (otp-hbn-rx) differs from the insects and Nematostella, suggesting that an inversion occurred in the lophotrochozoan lineage. For the annelid Capitella we were only able to confirm linkage of otp-hbn, which has a comparable intergenic distance and the same transcriptional orientation as Lottia, but rx was located on a different scaffold in the current assembly, precluding a confident assessment of linkage. Rx is located near the end of the scaffold; however, there is one annotated gene (globin precursor, JGI 21023) between rx and the end of scaffold. Furthermore, if the orientation of the Capitella cluster is the same as that for Lottia (the most closely related species in our analysis), there would be > 400 kb of sequence separating these genes. We identified a number of genes within 40 kb of hbn, none of which were rx or any homeobox gene.

The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and the hemichordate Saccoglossus kowalevskii are the only deuterostomes in which we could identify a homeobrain gene. Because a public assembly of the Saccoglossus genome is not yet available, we were unable to assess linkage and can only report that orthologs for all three members of the cluster are present. In the sea urchin, hbn and rx are closely linked on the same genomic scaffold (Scaffold_v2_14510, length 454945 nt). The two genes are separated by a distance of approximately 22 kb. This intergenic distance is similar to that observed in Drosophila, Apis, Tribolium and Lottia. However, unlike these protostomes, in the urchin, both genes are encoded on the same strand of DNA. Otp maps to a different scaffold (Scaffold_v2_10421, length 387609 nt). Because otp resides on a different scaffold, evidence of linkage to hbn and rx could not be established. However, by taking into account the distances flanking otp on its scaffold and hbn and rx on their scaffold, otp can be no closer than 437,964 nucleotides from hbn and 193,112 nucleotides from rx.

We could not identify a homeobrain locus in the genomes of the urochordate Ciona, the cephalochordate Branchiostoma or any of the vertebrate taxa we queried (Homo, Mus, Rattus, Gallus, Xenopus and Danio). In all of the vertebrates and Ciona, otp and rx are located on different chromosomes, so no remnant of the hbn-rx-otp cluster remains. In the current Branchiostoma assembly, the otp and rx homeodomains are separated by ~162 kb on the same genomic scaffold. There are seven annotated genes within the intergenic region (JGI: 102897, 136227, 286088, 102900, 130204, 102902 and 270692) with diverse functions (for example, SCAMP (secretory carrier membrane protein), N-acetyltransferase, tubulin chaperone).

We identified orthologs of otp and hbn, but not rx, in the placozoan Trichoplax. Both of these genes are located on the same scaffold, are separated by approximately 15 kb and have the same transcriptional orientation. Because Trichoplax represents the earliest diverging taxa in our study, the close proximity of otp and hbn strongly suggests that these genes have been clustered since very early in animal evolution.

Developmental expression of otp, rx and homeobrain Orthopedia

Whole-mount in situ hybridization using an antisense NvOtp riboprobe of 1,556 bp revealed that expression begins in mid planula stages (Figure 5e), well after gastrulation is complete. Expression is confined to the oral pole and the oral end of the pharyngeal ectoderm. Expression appears strongest at the oral opening but extends into the pharyngeal ectoderm. Expression is also apparent in scattered cells in the body wall ectoderm, which appear to be neurons based on morphological criteria, namely their position deep within the ectoderm and their basally located nuclei (Figure 5f, Figure 5g) [42]. Later, Otp expression is also seen in the tentacle ectoderm (Figure 5h, Figure 5i). Oral expression persists well into polyp stages (Figure 5j, Figure 5k). The probe used for in situ hybridization overlaps a substantial portion (< 300 bp) of all three predicted splice variants, so this probe would presumably bind to all three.
Figure 5

Expression of NvOtp. In situ hybridization using a 1556 bp probe of otp. In all panels, the asterisk denotes the blastopore or oral end. (a) Expression is not detected in the egg, (b) during early cleavage or (c,d) during gastrulation. (e,f) Expression is detected in the planula stage in the ectoderm around the pharynx (ph) and in single ectodermal cells (arrows). (g) Oral view of the same planula from (f). (h,i) Similar expression in later stages as tentacles (t) begin to grow. (j,k) Polyp stages showing high expression in an oral ectodermal ring.


Expression of Rx begins before otp expression, during mid gastrulation (Figure 6c) Rx is initially expressed in the aboral hemisphere (Figure 6d), but by the end of gastrulation, expression becomes refined to a band that encircles the aboral side of the midbody but is excluded from the aboral pole, including the position of the presumptive apical tuft. Within this band, expression is spotty; only a fraction of the cells within the boundaries of the expression domain actually express Rx. As with otp and hbn, these rx-expressing cells in the ectoderm have the morphological appearance of neurons (Figure 6f, Figure 6i). Rx expression persists in this aboral band throughout planula and polyp stages (Figure 6g-j). During adult polyp stages, a second domain of expression is seen in individual ectodermal cells in the middle of each tentacle (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Expression of NvRx. In situ hybridization using a 1419 bp probe of rx. The asterisks denote the blastopore or oral end. (a,b) No expression is detected in the egg or early cleavage stages. (c,d) Mid gastrula stages showing expression around the aboral ectoderm. (e) Late gastrula stage showing a band of expression towards the aboral pole. (f) The same embryo in (e) as viewed from the aboral pole, showing a lack of expression where the future apical tuft (at) will form. (g-j) Planula stages, with (i) showing a surface view of the patchy expression. (k) Polyp stage, showing a close-up view of expression in the ectoderm of the tentacles (t).


Homeobrain is first detected in the late blastula, when it is expressed throughout most of the blastoderm except in the region surrounding the blastopore (the presumptive gastrodermis; Figure 7c,d). With the onset of gastrulation, expression becomes excluded from the aboral pole, where the apical tuft of sensory cilia will form (Figure 7d,e). As gastrulation proceeds, expression persists in populations of ectodermal cells around the oral pole and later in those that encircle the base of each developing tentacle (Figure 7g,h). Expression is also seen in individual cells that are scattered throughout the mid body (Figure 7g). These cells have the morphological appearance of neurons. During polyp stages, expression is confined primarily to the ectoderm at the base of the tentacles (Figure 7i-k).
Figure 7

Expression of NvHbn. In situ hybridization using a 749 bp probe of hbn. The asterisks mark the blastopore or oral end. (a,b) Egg and early cleavage stages showing a lack of expression. (c) Blastula stage embryo showing expression everywhere except in the blastopore. (d) Mid gastrula showing lack of expression in the invaginating endoderm (en). (e,f) Lateral and oral views of a late gastrula, stage embryo. (g) Planula stage, showing strong expression around the future tentacles (arrow) and in the putative neurons (n) of the mid body. (h,i) Early polyp stage showing expression around the base of the tentacles (t). (j,k) Older polyp stages, where expression is confined to the base of the tentacles.


The functional evolution of hbn, rx and otp

Homeobrain was originally identified in Drosophila[43], and mapped to a region of chromosome 2 that contained two additional PRD-class homeobox genes, Orthopedia and rx[44, 45]. Homeobrain is expressed in the fly embryonic brain and ventral nerve cord [31]. Recently the first lophotrochozan homeobrain-like gene was reported [41], and found to be expressed in a restricted region of the anterior brain. Hbn expression has also been reported in the sea urchin, where it is expressed in oral ganglia of the animal pole [46].

Otp is associated with neural development in a phylogenetically diverse collection of animals, and this may represent an ancestral role for this homeodomain family. Orthopedia-related genes in mouse are involved in brain patterning and development [4752]. In the hemichordate Saccoglossus, otp has punctate, ectodermal expression in neural domains of the prosome (proboscis) and mesocome (collar) [53]. In planaria, orthopedia is implicated in patterning the branch structure of the brain [54, 55]. In the limpet, otp is involved in the development of the larval apical sensory organ [56], and in flies it is involved in the developing CNS and hindgut and anal pads [51]. However, a connection to neural development is not obvious in the sea urchin, where otp appears to be involved in larval skeletal morphogenesis and the establishment of oral ectodermal cell fate [5761].

Rx (retinal associated homeobox) genes have been extensively studied in many deuterostome taxa including human, mouse, Xenopus, chicken, zebrafish, medaka and tunicate [45, 6270]. In all of these organisms, rx is involved in brain development and the formation of retinal territories and associated neural structures. In the hemichordate, rx is expressed throughout the prosome ectoderm, the most anterior region of this organism, but absent from the most apical pole [53]. Rx is expressed more broadly during sea urchin development, with punctate expression in the animal pole and developing gut [46]. A fruit fly rx gene has also been identified, and studies suggest that it is necessary for proper brain development, but it is not required for eye development [45, 71].

Alternative splice variants in orthopedia and rx

In addition to a homeodomain and a PRD domain, two additional motifs have been identified in some PRD-like genes. The octapeptide motif [72, 73], located towards the N-terminus, is involved in transcriptional repression [74]. The OAR domain, found in otp, aristaless and rx[40, 51, 67, 75] is typically located at the C-terminus and is known to function as a transactivator in Otp[40, 51].

We have identified alternative transcripts for Nematostella orthopedia and rx. For rx, some transcripts encode a highly conserved OAR domain and one transcript does not. For orthopedia, none of our RACE products nor any ESTs in publicly available databases included the OAR domain. However, a well-conserved OAR domain was identified downstream and in-frame of these sequences in predicted genomic gene models, suggesting that this domain is probably expressed in an as yet unidentified splice variant. The OAR domain has been described as an intramolecular switch, which acts to reduce the affinity of the homeodomain transcription factor for its binding site. In the mouse, ectopically expressed mutant forms of the Alx3 and Cart1 proteins lacking the OAR domain exhibit increased binding to their DNA targets [76].

Alternative splice variants involving the presence or absence of an OAR domain have also been identified the mouse prx1 gene, a member of the PMX family of PRD-class homeobox genes [77]. The carboxy terminus of the Prx1a protein includes an activation domain and an OAR domain, whereas the carboxy terminus of Prx1b encodes a repression domain and lacks an OAR domain [77, 78]. The tissue distribution of both transcripts appears to be similar in mice and humans, but different tissues exhibit pronounced differences in the relative ratios of prx1a and prx1b[79, 80]. It has been hypothesized that the presence of the OAR domain in prx1a could render it sensitive to modulation via an unidentified partner protein that interacts with the OAR domain itself. In the absence of this cofactor, the OAR domain masks the activation domain and reduces the affinity of prx1a for DNA binding sites. When bound by its co-factor, the activation domain becomes unmasked and the DNA binding affinity increases [76, 77, 81]. In the case of Nematostella rx, the situation may be somewhat simpler than in the mouse prx1 gene, because except for the presence or absence of the OAR domain itself, the alternative splice variants encode essentially identical proteins.

Functional inferences about Nematostella otp, rx and hbn based on expression data

In the most famous example of a conserved homeobox cluster, the Hox genes, the spatial ordering of Hox expression territories along the body's main axis and the timing of their onset mirrors the physical ordering of linked Hox genes (although not in all taxa). This correspondence is termed colinearity. However, in animals with dispersed Hox clusters, such as the urochordate Oikopleura dioica, some spatial colinearity remains whereas temporal colinearity is absent [82]. This suggests that it is temporal rather than spatial colinearity that is driving the maintenance of these clusters. Although work has been performed in studying temporal colinearity in Hox, ParaHox and NK clusters, the homeobrain cluster could prove to be another supporting example.

In Nematostella, hbn, rx and otp appear to be expressed in a temporally colinear pattern. Hbn is expressed first, in the blastula stages, followed by rx at mid gastrulation and finally otp in the planula. However, in the case of the Drosophila homeobrain cluster, there is no clear evidence of temporal colinearity. Homeobrain is expressed first, in the syncytial blastoderm, then otp is expressed slightly before rx[31, 51, 65]. Future studies in other animals will help determine whether temporal colinearity is widely conserved among homeobrain clusters.

Although the expression of Nematostella hbn, rx and otp is consistent with temporal colinearity, it is not consistent with spatial colinearity. The three genes are expressed in non-overlapping domains along the oral-aboral axis; however, these domains do not appear to be related to their position in the cluster. NvRx is expressed at the most aboral domain, although expression is not present at the aboral pole, where the apical tuft will form. NvHbn is more broadly expressed in oral ectoderm during early embryogenesis and becomes confined to the most oral ectoderm, mainly around the base of the tentacles. Finally, NvOtp is also expressed in the oral ectoderm, in the domain that will invaginate and form the pharynx. NvOtp and NvHbn are both expressed in close proximity to three paralogs of Otx (NvOtxA, B, C) in the pharyngeal ectoderm and tentacles surrounding the oral pole [30].

In addition to the broad non-overlapping domains, all these genes are also expressed in individual cells throughout the body column. Based on their cell morphology, it appears that these cells may be neurons. Additionally, the expression of NvOtp and NvOtx(A,B,C) in the oral ectoderm coincides with formation of the oral nerve ring [30, 42]. Considering the function of these genes in other animals and the expression patterns seen here, it is likely that hbn, rx and otp play some role in neural development in Nematostella. However, it is interesting that there is no expression in the apical tuft, another strongly neurogenic region in Nematostella.

The evolutionary history of the homeobrain cluster

The literature on homeobox clusters would suggest that the history of the ANTP class has been qualitatively different from that of the histories of other classes of homeobox genes. The most intensively studied and widely conserved homeobox clusters are all composed of ANTP-class homeobox genes (the Antennapedia complex, the Bithorax complex, the Hox cluster, the ParaHox cluster, the NK cluster and the EGH box cluster). Ultimately, all of these ANTP-class clusters may derive from a single ancestral cluster. For example, the ANTP-C and BX-C of Drosophila are clearly derived from a single ancestral Hox cluster that is widely shared by protostomes and deuterostomes, and in simpler form, by cnidarians. The Hox cluster, in turn, appears to have broken off from an ancestral 'mega-Hox' or 'extended Hox' cluster that at one time may have encompassed the Hox cluster, the ParaHox cluster, the EGH cluster and the NK cluster. Over time, the hypothetical ancestral cluster appears to have fragmented, and different remnants of this ancestral cluster may be more highly conserved in different animal lineages [83].

This study is the first to provide evidence that a non-ANTP-class homeobox cluster was conserved over hundreds of millions of years of animal evolution. Clearly, the hbn-rx-otp cluster has been fairly well conserved over the evolutionary history of holometabolous insects. A cluster with the same constituent genes, in the same orientation, spanning a comparable distance is found in representatives of three different orders of insects (Coleoptera, Diptera and Hymenoptera; Figure 4). The cluster also appears to date to the ancestral Protostome, as evidenced by conservation of the three-gene cluster in the limpet Lottia, although the order of the genes has changed. In addition, the cluster was also likely to have been present in the cnidarian-bilaterian common ancestor, some 600 million years ago. The cluster in Nematostella involves the same closely linked genes in the same order as the inferred ancestral cluster of holometabolous insects, but the otp locus has been inverted. Similarly, in four other key taxa (cephalochordate, sea urchin, annelid and placozoan) we find evidence of a partial cluster, in which two of the three genes are linked. Further sequencing and assemblies of the echinoderm and hemichordate genomes will reveal the extent of the hbn-rx-otp cluster in the deuterostome ancestor. The placozoan genomic data suggests that a portion of this cluster (hbn and otp) dates back even further to the ancestral eumetazoan. However, it remains to be seen whether rx was present in this ancestor and lost in the placozoan lineage, or whether rx evolved after the split.

Mechanistically, it is easier to envision how a cluster of three closely related genes might remain linked than to envision how three closely related genes, if already dispersed, could independently become so closely juxtaposed in multiple taxa. If the genes arose by tandem duplication, the cluster would have originated as a result of the gene duplication; that is, the starting point would have been a cluster. Subsequently, the cluster could have been maintained over hundreds of millions of years of evolution in multiple animal lineages by stabilizing selection.

Closely linked genes will tend to reside in the same chromosomal territories, and they may come under the influence of shared regulatory elements. For this reason, the proper regulation of linked genes may be related to their physical proximity in the genome. This is the general explanation for why Hox genes have remained clustered for hundreds of millions of years in many animals that have been examined. In the case of Hox genes, the spatial ordering of Hox expression territories along the body's main axis mirrors the physical ordering of linked Hox genes along the chromosome. This correspondence is termed colinearity. In the anterior CNS, rx, hbn and otp are expressed in nested territories, which is somewhat reminiscent of Hox genes. Future bioinformatics studies could test for conserved regulatory elements within the hbn-rx-otp clusters of fly, honeybee and flour beetle. The functionality of these putative enhancer-binding sites could then be studied experimentally. In addition, the effect of cluster disruption can be examined experimentally in Drosophila and in mice, as it has been with Hox genes [84, 85]. It may also prove very informative to use evolutionary comparisons of taxa with intact and disrupted clusters to investigate the consequences of cluster disruption, as has recently been carried out for the ParaHox cluster [20].

The loss of homeobrain in chordates

The homeobrain gene appears to have been lost in chordates. We could not identify it in the sequenced genomes of human, mouse, chicken, clawed frog, zebrafish, lancelet or tunicate (Figure 4). However, we identified clear orthologs in two other deuterostomes (sea urchin and hemichordate) and throughout the protostomes and 'basal' metazoans. Thus, this gene may have been truly lost from the genome or it may have become so highly modified that it is no longer recognizable as a homeobrain ortholog. The phylogenetic analysis performed here, based on homeodomain sequences, does not strongly suggest another PRD-class gene as a possible ortholog. Unfortunately, we cannot rely on regions outside the 60-amino acid homeodomain to obtain additional phylogenetic signal because there was not sufficient sequence conservation to permit alignments across all genes represented in the phylogeny. The highly conserved 128-amino acid Paired domain, present in many PRD-class homeobox genes, is absent from the homeobrain, orthopedia and rx families, among others [29, 39, 40]. With the present data, our analyses support the hypothesis that homeobrain was lost early in the chordate lineage.

Coding polymorphisms in Nematostella

Despite potential stabilizing selection to maintain the cluster, we observed many polymorphisms in the Nematostella genes comprising the cluster, including nonsynonymous substitutions in the homeodomain of rx that have a patchy distribution in natural populations. The functional role of these polymorphisms awaits future experimental characterization. The presence of few homozygotes for the rare amino acid for each position in our sampling of natural populations is potential evidence for a functional difference between alleles.


A PRD-class homeobox cluster comprising homeobrain, orthopedia and rax is widely conserved in animals and thus represents an ancient gene cluster dating to early in metazoan evolution. Very similar clusters comprising these three genes are present in Nematostella, in diverse protostomes, and potentially in non-chordate deuterostomes. Chordates appear to have lost one member (homeobrain) and the linkage between the other two genes, rx and orthopedia, has dissolved in the diverse vertebrates we examined.



We are extremely grateful for the insightful suggestions of two anonymous reviewers. This research was supported by NSF grant IOS-0818831 to JRF.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biology, Boston University
Kewalo Marine Lab, Pacific Biosciences Research Center, University of Hawaii
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole


  1. Wotton KR, Weierud FK, Juarez-Morales JL, Alvares LE, Dietrich S, Lewis KE: Conservation of gene linkage in dispersed vertebrate NK homeobox clusters. Dev Genes Evol. 2009, 219: 481-496. 10.1007/s00427-009-0311-y.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Lemons D, McGinnis W: Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters. Science. 2006, 313: 1918-1922. 10.1126/science.1132040.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Larroux C, Fahey B, Degnan SM, Adamski M, Rokhsar DS, Degnan BM: The NK homeobox gene cluster predates the origin of hox genes. Current Biology. 2007, 17: 706-710. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.008.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Shimeld SM, Boyle MJ, Brunet T, Luke GN, Seaver EC: Clustered Fox genes in lophotrochozoans and the evolution of the bilaterian Fox gene cluster. Dev Biol. 2010, 340: 234-48. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.015.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Jiang XJ, Li S, Ravi V, Venkatesh B, Yu WP: Identification and comparative analysis of the protocadherin cluster in a reptile, the green anole lizard. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e7614-10.1371/journal.pone.0007614.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  6. Patel VS, Cooper SJ, Deakin JE, Fulton B, Graves T, Warren WC, Wilson RK, Graves JA: Platypus globin genes and flanking loci suggest a new insertional model for beta-globin evolution in birds and mammals. BMC Biol. 2008, 6: 34-10.1186/1741-7007-6-34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  7. Stock DW: The Dlx gene complement of the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata, resembles that of mammals: implications for genomic and morphological evolution of jawed vertebrates. Genetics. 2005, 169: 807-817. 10.1534/genetics.104.031831.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Vogel JH, von Heydebreck A, Purmann A, Sperling S: Chromosomal clustering of a human transcriptome reveals regulatory background. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 230-10.1186/1471-2105-6-230.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  9. Coulier F, Popovici C, Villet R, Birnbaum D: MetaHox gene clusters. J Exp Zool. 2000, 288: 345-351. 10.1002/1097-010X(20001215)288:4<345::AID-JEZ7>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Pollard SL, Holland PW: Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 1059-1062. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00676-X.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Hughes AL: Evolution of the integrin alpha and beta protein families. J Mol Evol. 2001, 52: 63-72.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Lopreato GF, Lu Y, Southwell A, Atkinson NS, Hillis DM, Wilcox TP, Zakon HH: Evolution and divergence of sodium channel genes in vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 7588-7592. 10.1073/pnas.131171798.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Granadino B, Rey-Campos J: EVG, the remnants of a primordial bilaterian's synteny of functionally unrelated genes. J Mol Evol. 2003, 57: 515-519. 10.1007/s00239-003-2503-9.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Shibuya K, Kudoh J, Obayashi I, Shimizu A, Sasaki T, Minoshima S, Shimizu N: Comparative genomics of the keratin-associated protein (KAP) gene clusters in human, chimpanzee, and baboon. Mamm Genome. 2004, 15: 179-192. 10.1007/s00335-003-2313-9.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Maclean JA, Chen MA, Wayne CM, Bruce SR, Rao M, Meistrich ML, Macleod C, Wilkinson MF: Rhox: a new homeobox gene cluster. Cell. 2005, 120: 369-382. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.022.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Chourrout D, Delsuc F, Chourrout P, Edvardsen RB, Rentzsch F, Renfer E, Jensen MF, Zhu B, de Jong P, Steele RE, Technau U: Minimal ProtoHox cluster inferred from bilaterian and cnidarian Hox complements. Nature. 2006, 442: 684-687. 10.1038/nature04863.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Mazet F, Amemiya CT, Shimeld SM: An ancient Fox gene cluster in bilaterian animals. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: R314-316. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.088.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Ryan JF, Mazza ME, Pang K, Matus DQ, Baxevanis AD, Martindale MQ, Finnerty JR: Pre-bilaterian origins of the hox cluster and the hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS ONE. 2007, 2: e153-10.1371/journal.pone.0000153.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  19. Sullivan JC, Ryan JF, Mullikin JC, Finnerty JR: Conserved and novel Wnt clusters in the basal eumetazoan Nematostella vectensis. Dev Genes Evol. 2007, 217: 235-239. 10.1007/s00427-007-0136-5.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Hui J, Raible F, Korchagina N, Dray N, Samain S, Magdelenat G, Jubin C, Segurens B, Balavoine G, Arendt D, Ferrier D: Features of the ancestral bilaterian inferred from Platynereis dumerilii ParaHox genes. BMC Biology. 2009, 7: 43-10.1186/1741-7007-7-43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  21. Kerner P, Ikmi A, Coen D, Vervoort M: Evolutionary history of the iroquois/Irx genes in metazoans. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2009, 9: 74-10.1186/1471-2148-9-74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  22. Lewis EB: A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature. 1978, 276: 565-570. 10.1038/276565a0.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Mann RS: Why are Hox genes clustered?. Bioessays. 1997, 19: 661-664. 10.1002/bies.950190804.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Balavoine G, de Rosa R, Adoutte A: Hox clusters and bilaterian phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002, 24: 366-373. 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00237-3.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Martinez P, Amemiya CT: Genomics of the HOX gene cluster. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 133: 571-580. 10.1016/S1096-4959(02)00121-5.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Arnone MI, Rizzo F, Annunciata R, Cameron RA, Peterson KJ, Martinez P: Genetic organization and embryonic expression of the ParaHox genes in the sea urchin S. purpuratus: insights into the relationship between clustering and colinearity. Dev Biol. 2006, 300: 63-73. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.037.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Duboule D: The rise and fall of Hox gene clusters. Development. 2007, 134: 2549-2560. 10.1242/dev.001065.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Kurosawa G, Takamatsu N, Takahashi M, Sumitomo M, Sanaka E, Yamada K, Nishii K, Matsuda M, Asakawa S, Ishiguro H, Miura K, Kurosawa Y, Shimizu N, Kohara Y, Hori H: Organization and structure of hox gene loci in medaka genome and comparison with those of pufferfish and zebrafish genomes. Gene. 2006, 370: 75-82. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.11.015.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Bürglin TR: Homeodomain proteins. Encyclopedia or Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine. Edited by: Meyers RA. 2005, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag, 2
  30. Mazza ME, Pang K, Martindale MQ, Finnerty JR: Genomic organization, gene structure, and developmental expression of three Clustered otx genes in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol. 2007, 308: 494-506. 10.1002/jez.b.21158.View Article
  31. Walldorf U, Kiewe A, Wickert M, Ronshaugen M, McGinnis W: Homeobrain, a novel paired-like homeobox gene is expressed in the Drosophila brain. Mech Dev. 2000, 96: 141-144. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00380-4.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Ryan JF, Burton PM, Mazza ME, Kwong GK, Mullikin JC, Finnerty JR: The cnidarian-bilaterian ancestor possessed at least 56 homeoboxes. Evidence from the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. Genome Biol. 2006, 7: R64-10.1186/gb-2006-7-7-r64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  33. Sullivan JC, Ryan JF, Watson JA, Webb J, Mullikin JC, Rokhsar D, Finnerty JR: StellaBase: The Nematostella vectensis genomics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D495-499. 10.1093/nar/gkj020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  34. Putnam NH, Srivastava M, Hellsten U, Dirks B, Chapman J, Salamov A, Terry A, Shapiro H, Lindquist E, Kapitonov VV, Jurka J, Genikhovich G, Grigoriev IV, Lucas SM, Steele RE, Finnerty JR, Technau U, Martindale MQ, Rokhsar DS: Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science. 2007, 317: 86-94. 10.1126/science.1139158.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Edgar R: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004, 32: 1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  36. Felsenstein J: PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. 2005, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
  37. Maddison DR, Maddison WP: MacClade, version 4. 2005
  38. Finnerty JR, Paulson D, Burton P, Pang K, Martindale MQ: Early evolution of a homeobox gene: the parahox gene Gsx in the Cnidaria and the Bilateria. Evol Dev. 2003, 5: 331-345. 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03041.x.View ArticlePubMed
  39. Bürglin TR: A comprehensive classification of homeobox genes. Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes. Edited by: Duboule D. 1994, New York: Oxford University Press, 25-72.
  40. Galliot B, de Vargas C, Miller DJ: Evolution of homeobox genes: Q50 Paired-like genes founded the Paired class. Dev Genes Evol. 1999, 209: 186-197. 10.1007/s004270050243.View ArticlePubMed
  41. Fröbius AC, Seaver EC: Capitella sp. I homeobrain-like, the first lophotrochozoan member of a novel paired-like homeobox gene family. Gene Expr Patterns. 2006, 6: 958-91. 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.04.002.View Article
  42. Marlow HQ, Srivastava M, Matus DQ, Rokhsar D, Martindale MQ: Anatomy and development of the nervous system of Nematostella vectensis, an anthozoan cnidarian. Dev Neurobiol. 2009, 69: 235-254. 10.1002/dneu.20698.View ArticlePubMed
  43. Barad M, Jack T, Chadwick R, McGinnis W: A novel, tissue-specific, Drosophila homeobox gene. Embo J. 1988, 7: 2151-2161.PubMed CentralPubMed
  44. Dessain S, McGinnis W: Drosophila homeobox genes. Adv Dev Biochem. 1993, 2: 1-55. full_text.View Article
  45. Eggert T, Hauck B, Hildebrandt N, Gehring WJ, Walldorf U: Isolation of a Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate homeobox gene Rx and its possible role in brain and eye development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 2343-2348. 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2343.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  46. Burke RD, Angerer LM, Elphick MR, Humphrey GW, Yaguchi S, Kiyama T, Liang S, Mu X, Agca C, Klein WH, Brandhorst BP, Rowe M, Wilson K, Churcher AM, Taylor JS, Chen N, Murray G, Wang D, Mellott D, Olinski R, Hallböök F, Thorndyke MC: A genomic view of the sea urchin nervous system. Dev Biol. 2006, 300: 434-460. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  47. Acampora D, Postiglione MP, Avantaggiato V, Di Bonito M, Simeone A: The role of Otx and Otp genes in brain development. Int J Dev Biol. 2000, 44: 669-677.PubMed
  48. Acampora D, Postiglione MP, Avantaggiato V, Di Bonito M, Vaccarino FM, Michaud J, Simeone A: Progressive impairment of developing neuroendocrine cell lineages in the hypothalamus of mice lacking the Orthopedia gene. Genes Dev. 1999, 13: 2787-2800. 10.1101/gad.13.21.2787.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  49. Del Giacco L, Sordino P, Pistocchi A, Andreakis N, Tarallo R, Di Benedetto B, Cotelli F: Differential regulation of the zebrafish orthopedia 1 gene during fate determination of diencephalic neurons. BMC Dev Biol. 2006, 6: 50-10.1186/1471-213X-6-50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  50. Lin X, State MW, Vaccarino FM, Greally J, Hass M, Leckman JF: Identification, chromosomal assignment, and expression analysis of the human homeodomain-containing gene Orthopedia (OTP). Genomics. 1999, 60: 96-104. 10.1006/geno.1999.5882.View ArticlePubMed
  51. Simeone A, D'Apice MR, Nigro V, Casanova J, Graziani F, Acampora D, Avantaggiato V: Orthopedia, a novel homeobox-containing gene expressed in the developing CNS of both mouse and Drosophila. Neuron. 1994, 13: 83-101. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90461-8.View ArticlePubMed
  52. Wang W, Lufkin T: The murine Otp homeobox gene plays an essential role in the specification of neuronal cell lineages in the developing hypothalamus. Dev Biol. 2000, 227: 432-449. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9902.View ArticlePubMed
  53. Lowe CJ, Wu M, Salic A, Evans L, Lander E, Stange-Thomann N, Gruber CE, Gerhart J, Kirschner M: Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system. Cell. 2003, 113: 853-865. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00469-0.View ArticlePubMed
  54. Umesono Y, Watanabe K, Agata K: A planarian orthopedia homolog is specifically expressed in the branch region of both the mature and regenerating brain. Dev Growth Differ. 1997, 39: 723-727. 10.1046/j.1440-169X.1997.t01-5-00008.x.View ArticlePubMed
  55. Umesono Y, Watanabe K, Agata K: Distinct structural domains in the planarian brain defined by the expression of evolutionarily conserved homeobox genes. Dev Genes Evol. 1999, 209: 31-39. 10.1007/s004270050224.View ArticlePubMed
  56. Nederbragt AJ, te Welscher P, van den Driesche S, van Loon AE, Dictus WJ: Novel and conserved roles for orthodenticle/otx and orthopedia/otp orthologs in the gastropod mollusc Patella vulgata. Dev Genes Evol. 2002, 212: 330-337. 10.1007/s00427-002-0246-z.View ArticlePubMed
  57. Di Bernardo M, Bellomonte D, Castagnetti S, Melfi R, Oliveri P, Spinelli G: Homeobox genes and sea urchin development. Int J Dev Biol. 2000, 44: 637-643.PubMed
  58. Di Bernardo M, Castagnetti S, Bellomonte D, Oliveri P, Melfi R, Palla F, Spinelli G: Spatially restricted expression of PlOtp, a Paracentrotus lividus orthopedia-related homeobox gene, is correlated with oral ectodermal patterning and skeletal morphogenesis in late-cleavage sea urchin embryos. Development. 1999, 126: 2171-2179.PubMed
  59. Zhou N, Wilson KA, Andrews ME, Kauffman JS, Raff RA: Evolution of OTP-independent larval skeleton patterning in the direct-developing sea urchin, Heliocidaris erythrogramma. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol. 2003, 300: 58-71.View Article
  60. Cavalieri V, Bernardo MD, Spinelli G: Regulatory sequences driving expression of the sea urchin Otp homeobox gene in oral ectoderm cells. Gene Expr Patterns. 2007, 7: 124-30. 10.1016/j.modgep.2006.06.001.View ArticlePubMed
  61. Cavalieri V, Spinelli G, Di Bernardo M: Impairing Otp homeodomain function in oral ectoderm cells affects skeletogenesis in sea urchin embryos. Dev Biol. 2003, 262: 107-118. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00317-8.View ArticlePubMed
  62. Bailey TJ, El-Hodiri H, Zhang L, Shah R, Mathers PH, Jamrich M: Regulation of vertebrate eye development by Rx genes. Int J Dev Biol. 2004, 48: 761-770. 10.1387/ijdb.041878tb.View ArticlePubMed
  63. Casarosa S, Andreazzoli M, Simeone A, Barsacchi G: Xrx1, a novel Xenopus homeobox gene expressed during eye and pineal gland development. Mech Dev. 1997, 61: 187-198. 10.1016/S0925-4773(96)00640-5.View ArticlePubMed
  64. Chuang JC, Mathers PH, Raymond PA: Expression of three Rx homeobox genes in embryonic and adult zebrafish. Mech Dev. 1999, 84: 195-198. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00077-5.View ArticlePubMed
  65. Chuang JC, Raymond PA: Zebrafish genes rx1 and rx2 help define the region of forebrain that gives rise to retina. Dev Biol. 2001, 231: 13-30. 10.1006/dbio.2000.0125.View ArticlePubMed
  66. D'Aniello S, D'Aniello E, Locascio A, Memoli A, Corrado M, Russo MT, Aniello F, Fucci L, Brown ER, Branno M: The ascidian homolog of the vertebrate homeobox gene Rx is essential for ocellus development and function. Differentiation. 2006, 74: 222-234. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2006.00071.x.View ArticlePubMed
  67. Furukawa T, Kozak CA, Cepko CL: rax, a novel paired-type homeobox gene, shows expression in the anterior neural fold and developing retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 3088-3093. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3088.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  68. Loosli F, Winkler S, Burgtorf C, Wurmbach E, Ansorge W, Henrich T, Grabher C, Arendt D, Carl M, Krone A, Grzebisz E, Wittbrodt J: Medaka eyeless is the key factor linking retinal determination and eye growth. Development. 2001, 128: 4035-4044.PubMed
  69. Mathers PH, Jamrich M: Regulation of eye formation by the Rx and pax6 homeobox genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000, 57: 186-194. 10.1007/PL00000683.View ArticlePubMed
  70. Ohuchi H, Tomonari S, Itoh H, Mikawa T, Noji S: Identification of chick rax/rx genes with overlapping patterns of expression during early eye and brain development. Mech Dev. 1999, 85: 193-195. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00094-5.View ArticlePubMed
  71. Davis RJ, Tavsanli BC, Dittrich C, Walldorf U, Mardon G: Drosophila retinal homeobox (drx) is not required for establishment of the visual system, but is required for brain and clypeus development. Dev Biol. 2003, 259: 272-287. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00201-X.View ArticlePubMed
  72. Burri M, Tromvoukis Y, Bopp D, Frigerio G, Noll M: Conservation of the paired domain in metazoans and its structure in three isolated human genes. EMBO J. 1989, 8: 1183-1190.PubMed CentralPubMed
  73. Schneitz K, Spielmann P, Noll M: Molecular genetics of aristaless, a prd-type homeo box gene involved in the morphogenesis of proximal and distal pattern elements in a subset of appendages in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1993, 7: 114-129. 10.1101/gad.7.1.114.View ArticlePubMed
  74. Smith ST, Jaynes JB: A conserved region of engrailed, shared among all en-, gsc-, Nk1-, Nk2- and msh-class homeoproteins, mediates active transcriptional repression in vivo. Development. 1996, 122: 3141-3150.PubMed CentralPubMed
  75. Miura H, Yanazawa M, Kato K, Kitamura K: Expression of a novel aristaless related homeobox gene 'Arx' in the vertebrate telencephalon, diencephalon and floor plate. Mech Dev. 1997, 65: 99-109. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00062-2.View ArticlePubMed
  76. Brouwer A, ten Berge D, Wiegerinck R, Meijlink F: The OAR/aristaless domain of the homeodomain protein Cart1 has an attenuating role in vivo. Mech Dev. 2003, 120: 241-252. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00416-1.View ArticlePubMed
  77. Norris RA, Kern MJ: The identification of Prx1 transcription regulatory domains provides a mechanism for unequal compensation by the Prx1 and Prx2 loci. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 26829-26837. 10.1074/jbc.M100239200.View ArticlePubMed
  78. Norris RA, Kern MJ: Identification of domains mediating transcription activation, repression, and inhibition in the paired-related homeobox protein, Prx2 (S8). DNA Cell Biol. 2001, 20: 89-99. 10.1089/104454901750070292.View ArticlePubMed
  79. Kern MJ, Witte DP, Valerius MT, Aronow BJ, Potter SS: A novel murine homeobox gene isolated by a tissue specific PCR cloning strategy. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20: 5189-5195. 10.1093/nar/20.19.5189.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  80. Norris RA, Scott KK, Moore CS, Stetten G, Brown CR, Jabs EW, Wulfsberg EA, Yu J, Kern MJ: Human PRRX1 and PRRX2 genes: cloning, expression, genomic localization, and exclusion as disease genes for Nager syndrome. Mamm Genome. 2000, 11: 1000-1005. 10.1007/s003350010193.View ArticlePubMed
  81. Chesterman ES, Kern MJ: Comparative analysis of Prx1 and Prx2 expression in mice provides evidence for incomplete compensation. Anat Rec. 2002, 266: 1-4. 10.1002/ar.10028.View ArticlePubMed
  82. Seo HC, Edvardsen RB, Maeland AD, Bjordal M, Jensen MF, Hansen A, Flaat M, Weissenbach J, Lehrach H, Wincker P, Reinhardt R, Chourrout D: Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature. 2004, 431: 67-71. 10.1038/nature02709.View ArticlePubMed
  83. Garcia-Fernandez J: The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6: 881-892. 10.1038/nrg1723.View ArticlePubMed
  84. Spitz F, Herkenne C, Morris MA, Duboule D: Inversion-induced disruption of the Hoxd cluster leads to the partition of regulatory landscapes. Nat Genet. 2005, 37: 889-893. 10.1038/ng1597.View ArticlePubMed
  85. Tiong SYK, Whittle JRS, Gribbin MC: Chromosomal continuity in the abdominal region of the bithorax complex of Drosophila is not essential for its contribution to metameric identity. Development. 1987, 101: 135-142.PubMed
  86. Technau U, Rudd S, Maxwell P, Gordon PM, Saina M, Grasso LC, Hayward DC, Sensen CW, Saint R, Holstein TW, Ball EE, Miller DJ: Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians. Trends Genet. 2005, 21: 633-639. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.007.View ArticlePubMed


© Mazza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.