Functional genetic characterization of salivary gland development in Aedes aegypti
© Nguyen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 September 2012
Accepted: 7 December 2012
Published: 6 March 2013
Despite the devastating global impact of mosquito-borne illnesses on human health, very little is known about mosquito developmental biology. In this investigation, functional genetic analysis of embryonic salivary gland development was performed in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever vector and an emerging model for vector mosquito development. Although embryonic salivary gland development has been well studied in Drosophila melanogaster, little is known about this process in mosquitoes or other arthropods.
Mosquitoes possess orthologs of many genes that regulate Drosophila melanogaster embryonic salivary gland development. The expression patterns of a large subset of these genes were assessed during Ae. aegypti development. These studies identified a set of molecular genetic markers for the developing mosquito salivary gland. Analysis of marker expression allowed for tracking of the progression of Ae. aegypti salivary gland development in embryos. In Drosophila, the salivary glands develop from placodes located in the ventral neuroectoderm. However, in Ae. aegypti, salivary marker genes are not expressed in placode-like patterns in the ventral neuroectoderm. Instead, marker gene expression is detected in salivary gland rudiments adjacent to the proventriculus. These observations highlighted the need for functional genetic characterization of mosquito salivary gland development. An siRNA- mediated knockdown strategy was therefore employed to investigate the role of one of the marker genes, cyclic-AMP response element binding protein A (Aae crebA), during Ae. aegypti salivary gland development. These experiments revealed that Aae crebA encodes a key transcriptional regulator of the secretory pathway in the developing Ae. aegypti salivary gland.
The results of this investigation indicated that the initiation of salivary gland development in Ae. aegypti significantly differs from that of D. melanogaster. Despite these differences, some elements of salivary gland development, including the ability of CrebA to regulate secretory gene expression, are conserved between the two species. These studies underscore the need for further analysis of mosquito developmental genetics and may foster comparative studies of salivary gland development in additional insect species.
KeywordsAedes aegypti CrebA Development Drosophila melanogaster Mosquito Salivary gland siRNA Vector
Despite the devastating global impact of mosquito-borne illnesses on human health, vector mosquito developmental biology has been grossly understudied. Although excellent descriptions of the development of some species, including the dengue and yellow fever vector mosquito Aedes aegypti have been compiled, detailed expression patterns of only a handful of mosquito embryonic genes have been described in this or any other mosquito species [1–3]. We recently began to address the need for developmental research in mosquitoes through the pursuit of functional developmental genetic studies in Ae. aegypti[4–10]. A number of key advantages make Ae. aegypti an excellent species in which to study mosquito developmental biology. Females of this species lay eggs on artificial substrates such as paper towels, which facilitates the narrowly timed egg collections that are often required for developmental studies. Also, Ae. aegypti undergo egg diapause, an advantage that permits egg storage and which significantly decreases the amount of labor required for maintenance of transgenic strains. Furthermore, our recent survey suggests that orthologs of many developmental genes are found in the Ae. aegypti genome . We recently published methodology for functional analysis of developmental genes in Ae. aegypti. These methods, including procedures for egg collection, tissue preparation, gene and protein expression, and knockdown of developmental genes [4–8], in conjunction with previously published mosquito protocols [12, 13] are facilitating functional developmental genetic studies in Ae. aegypti. It is anticipated that the analysis of development in Ae. aegypti, an emerging model for vector mosquito development, will foster comparative studies in other vector mosquito species. Here, we investigate development of the Ae. aegypti salivary gland.
The salivary glands of blood-feeding adult female vector mosquitoes have been the subject of many research investigations. The saliva secreted by hematophagous mosquitoes contains antihemostatic and anti-inflammatory agents. These secretions counteract host responses that might restrict blood flow or draw attention to the feeding site and are critical for blood-feeding behavior in adult female mosquitoes [14, 15]. The salivary glands of adult females are also crucial for pathogen transmission to human hosts. Following salivary gland infection, female mosquitoes are competent for disease transmission for the duration of their lives . Although adult salivary glands have been intensely studied, genetic analysis of the developing embryonic mosquito salivary gland, the focus of this investigation, has not been pursued. Moreover, analysis of mosquito salivary gland development is of significant importance to the comparative arthropod development community, as we presently lack knowledge of arthropod salivary gland developmental genetics outside of Drosophila melanogaster, a genetic model in which it has been studied extensively [16, 17].
In D. melanogaster, salivary gland development initiates from two primordia, the salivary gland placodes, that are located in the ventral neuroectoderm (VNE). During development, cells from each individual placode invaginate, forming internalized pairs of secretory tubes that elongate dorsally [16, 17]. It was hypothesized at the onset of our investigation that salivary gland development in other dipteran insects would resemble that of D. melanogaster. However, recent studies that uncovered differences between D. melanogaster and mosquito embryonic development highlighted the critical importance of experimentally testing this hypothesis [9–11]. Furthermore, although mosquito salivary gland development has not been assessed genetically, a morphological description of the development of the inland freshwater mosquito Ae. vexans suggested that the salivary glands of this aedine mosquito species develop as outpocketings of the proventriculus, the intussusception of the end of the esophagus into the midgut . This brief description suggested that the origins of the mosquito salivary gland may differ from D. melanogaster[16, 17] and further emphasized the need to experimentally test our hypothesis.
In this investigation, we identified genetic markers for the developing Ae. aegypti embryonic salivary gland which were used to track the origins and progression of the development of this tissue. Analysis of marker gene expression revealed significant differences between Ae. aegypti and D. melanogaster salivary gland development, and these differences underscored the need for thorough functional genetic characterization of the development of this tissue in mosquitoes. Here, we initiated these studies by employing an siRNA-mediated knockdown strategy to investigate the role of one of the marker genes, cyclic-AMP response element binding protein A (Aae crebA), during Ae. aegypti salivary gland development.
Mosquito rearing, egg collection and fixation
The Ae. aegypti Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-1B12) strain was used in these studies. Procedures for mosquito rearing, egg collection  and fixation  have been previously described. Blood feeding of mosquitoes was performed in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and an animal use protocol that was approved by the University of Notre Dame Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Study # 14–026).
Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously . Anti-Drosophila CrebA was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA, USA).
Candidate marker genes were selected on the basis of their orthology to known salivary gland markers in D. melanogaster, which were selected through literature searches and by using the ontology search tool in FlyExpress [21, 22]. Orthology calls were prepared with the aid of Biomart  and VectorBase . Genes with 1:1 orthology to the relevant D. melanogaster genes were chosen for expression analyses. cAMP response element (CRE) sites upstream of these genes were identified through assessment of the 5′ flanking regions, which were exported from VectorBase and searched for sequences corresponding to the CRE consensus sequence .
In situ hybridization
Riboprobes corresponding to the Ae. aegypti genes listed in Additional file 1 were synthesized according to the Patel protocol . In situ hybridization experiments were performed as previously described .
Knockdown of Aae crebA was performed through embryonic microinjection of siRNAs corresponding to this gene. siRNA design and microinjection were performed using previously published methodology , which has been utilized in two recent knockdown investigations [9, 10]. The following siRNAs corresponding to Ae. aegypti crebA were synthesized by Dharmacon RNAi Technologies (Lafayette, CO, USA): siRNA-1 sense, GCAGUCAACCG GUAAGAUA and antisense, CGUCAGUUGGCCAUUC UAU (corresponds to base pairs of 816 to 834 of Aae crebA); and siRNA-2 sense, UGUUGGAGCACAAGGU AGU and antisense, ACAACCUCGUGUUCCAUCA (corresponds to base pairs 47 to 488 of Aae crebA). A scrambled version of siRNA-1 was used as a control: sense, GAAACGCACGUAAGUAGUC and antisense, CUUUGC GUGCAUUCAUCAG. All siRNAs were injected at a concentration of 6 μg/uL. In all cases, two to three replicate experiments (n = 30 per control or experimental group) were performed with both siRNA-1 and siRNA-2. Measurement of knockdown effectiveness was assessed through in situ hybridization.
The initial stages of salivary gland development in Ae. aegypti and D. melanogaster differ
In light of these findings, beginning with first instar larvae in which the salivary glands are prominent structures located adjacent to the proventriculus , the origin of the larval salivary glands was investigated through examination of progressively earlier stages of development. These studies, which were performed in conjunction with analysis of the expression patterns of Aae crebA and paps, demonstrated that the salivary glands develop from two rudiments located on either side of the proventriculus, where expression of both genes (Aae crebA in Figure 1K and Aae paps in Figure 2E) could be detected beginning at 50 hours of development. Collectively, these results suggested that the initial stages of Ae. aegypti embryonic salivary gland development significantly differ from that of D. melanogaster.
Embryonic development of the Ae. aegypti salivary gland
Analysis of Aae crebA and paps expression from 50 hours of development through later stages of embryogenesis allowed for tracking of the progression of salivary gland development, which was assessed in greater detail. The salivary gland rudiments consist of two different cell types: preduct and presecretory cells. During embryogenesis, the presecretory cells form simple tubular glands (Figure 1L) that elongate as embryogenesis progresses (Figure 1M-O). By 75 hours of development, the secretory tubes are prominent thoracic structures located on either side of the proventriculus (Figure 1O), and this position is retained through hatching.
In addition to the secretory tubes, paps expression serves as a marker for the developing lateral ducts, which also arise from the salivary gland rudiment (Figure 2E,F). The two lateral ducts, each of which is attached to the anterior end of the developing secretory tube located on the same side, join with each other during embryogenesis (Figure 2F). Later, during the larval stages, a central common duct (which is not visible in embryos) will connect the lateral ducts to the larval mouth. Together, the larval ducts form a Y-shaped tube through which secretions of the gland are transported to the larval mouth .
Ae. aegypti salivary gland markers include secretory pathway component genes
A number of the marker genes identified encode members of the early secretory pathway. These genes, referred to as the secretory pathway component genes (SPCGs), encode the protein machinery that target and translocate proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, cleave the N-terminal signal sequence, and regulate vesicle transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. SPCG genes function in every cell, but are upregulated in the salivary gland given the secretory function of this organ . A list of identified Ae. aegypti SPCG gene orthologs, including their putative functions and orthology relationships with respect to the Drosophila genes, is provided in Additional file 2. Expression of a subset of these genes was assessed in the developing Ae. aegypti salivary gland: srp54, sec63, sec71, TRAM, spase22-23, sar1 and sec24 (Figure 3D,E,G; see Additional file 1 for more information about each gene). As expected, expression of these Aae SPCG orthologs was found to be enriched in the developing salivary glands.
CrebA is a regulator of secretory pathway genes in Ae. aegypti
Divergent and conserved mechanisms of insect salivary gland development
In recent years, knowledge of fruit fly development has served as a springboard for developmental studies in non-model arthropods like mosquitoes. Embryonic development of mosquitoes is superficially comparable to that of Drosophila in that mosquitoes, like fruit flies, are long germ-band holometabolous insects. However, although comparison of D. melanogaster and Ae. aegypti development suggests that major developmental events are generally well conserved between the two species, the D. melanogaster and mosquito insect lineages separated 260 million years ago, suggesting that detailed comparative analyses may uncover divergent developmental processes among these insects [3, 11]. This investigation has indeed revealed both divergent and conserved mechanisms of salivary gland development in D. melanogaster and Ae. aegypti.
The salivary glands of Ae. aegypti do not originate from Drosophila-like salivary gland placodes located in the VNE, but instead from rudiments located on either side of the proventriculus (Figures 1, 2 and 3). These findings are in agreement with the morphological analyses of Ae. vexans development described by Horsfall et al. . However, a report on Culex fatigans embryology  suggests that the aedine mode of salivary gland development may not be found in all mosquitoes. Davis , who prepared a brief description of salivary gland development, reported that ventrolateral surface cell division results in a pair of shallow invaginations that are the rudiments of the C. fatigans salivary gland. Her description, which is reminiscent of D. melanogaster salivary gland development [16, 17], suggests that these invaginations deepen and grow posteriorly, eventually lying beneath the stomodeum and the anterior end of the midgut rudiment strands. Likewise, the existence of ventral salivary gland placodes has been reported in the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori, suggesting that these structures may be present outside of the Diptera. However, based on their analysis of Bombyx mori silk gland factor-1, Kokubo et al.  concluded that the B. mori silk gland, not its salivary gland, is homologous to the D. melanogaster salivary gland. These observations, in conjunction with this investigation, suggest that it will be interesting to assess salivary marker gene expression in additional mosquitoes and other arthropod species.
Although divergent mechanisms for initiation of salivary gland development were observed, many of the genes that regulate salivary gland development in D. melanogaster are also expressed in the developing Ae. aegypti salivary gland. Thus, despite significant differences between the initiation of salivary gland development in the two species, expression of marker genes, including secretory genes (Figure 3), is conserved. Interestingly, comparable findings have been reported in our previous analyses of arthropod ventral nerve cord development [30–32]. These studies demonstrated that homologous neurons and ladder-like axon tracts were ultimately formed despite differences in the neuroblasts that produced these neurons in various arthropod species, as well as divergent mechanisms for forming the axon tracts in their ventral nerve cords.
Advancing the study of mosquito development
Although the salivary glands of adult vector mosquitoes have been the subject of many research investigations, this study was the first to assess the genetics of the developing mosquito salivary gland. These studies will promote further investigation of salivary gland development in Ae. aegypti as well as other mosquito species. In particular, it may be interesting to assess genes that regulate salivary gland development in the larval, pupal and early adult stages in this species. Such studies may reveal potential targets for intervention.
Future studies may build upon our observation that CrebA is a transcriptional regulator of secretory genes in the salivary gland, as suggested by the identification of CRE sites in multiple secretory pathway genes (Additional file 2), and as functionally assessed through knockdown studies in which CrebA expression was blocked through RNAi (Figure 5). This information may aid in the identification of enhancers that will drive gene expression in the developing salivary gland. For example, the results of this investigation, in conjunction with recent reports describing the introduction of the Gal4/UAS gene misexpression system into vector mosquitoes [33, 34], suggest that it may be useful to generate Gal4 strains bearing enhancers with CRE sites. These Gal4 strains could be used to drive misexpression of genes or RNAi constructs in the developing, and perhaps even the adult, salivary gland. Such tools, which would significantly enhance analysis of mosquito salivary gland development, could also be useful in the design of vector control efforts that utilize transgenic mosquitoes.
This study, the first genetic characterization of vector mosquito salivary gland development, has revealed a set of molecular genetic markers for the developing Ae. aegypti embryonic salivary gland. Identification of these markers, which allowed for tracking of salivary gland development, indicated that although many orthologs of D. melanogaster salivary gland development genes are expressed in the developing mosquito salivary gland, development of this tissue in Ae. aegypti significantly differs from that of D. melanogaster. These observations highlighted the need for functional genetic characterization of mosquito salivary gland development, which was explored through RNAi knockdown assays that revealed CrebA as a key regulator of the secretory pathway in the developing Ae. aegypti salivary gland. Further analysis of mosquito developmental genetics is necessary and may foster comparative studies of salivary gland development in additional arthropod species.
- Aae crebA:
Aedes aegypti cyclic-AMP response element binding protein A
cAMP response element
small interfering RNA
secretory pathway component genes
We are grateful for the technical assistance of Becky DeBruyn. Thanks to members of the Notre Dame undergraduate cell biology course who tested probes and made important observations during the preliminary stages of this work. We thank members of the Eck Institute for Global Health and members of the laboratory for advice and encouragement. This investigation was supported by NIH/NIAID Award R01-AI081795 to MDS.
- Raminani LN, Cupp EW:Early embryology ofAedes aegypti(L.) (Diptera: Culicdae).Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1975, 4: 517-528. 10.1016/0020-7322(75)90028-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raminani LN, Cupp EW:Embryology ofAedes aegypti(L.) (Diptera: Culicidae): organogenesis.Int J Insect Morphol Embryol. 1978, 7: 273-296. 10.1016/0020-7322(78)90009-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Haugen M, Flannery E, Tomchaney M, Kast K, Jacowski C, Le C, Mori A, Simanton Holland W, Sarro J, Severson DW, Duman-Scheel M: Aedes aegypti: an emerging model for vector mosquito development. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb.emo141-10.1101/pdb.emo141.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Mori A, Haugen M, Severson DW, Duman-Scheel M: Culturing and egg collection of Aedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb.prot5507-10.1101/pdb.prot5507.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Haugen M, Flannery E, Kast K, Jacowski C, Severson D, Duman-Scheel M: Fixation and preparation of developing tissues from Aedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb.prot5508-10.1101/pdb.prot5508.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Flannery E, Kast K, Severson D, Duman-Scheel M: Immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression during Aedes aegypti development. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb prot5510-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Haugen M, Severson D, Duman-Scheel M: Functional analysis of genes in Aedes aegypti embryos. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb prot5511-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haugen M, Tomchaney M, Kast K, Flannery E, Clemons A, Jacowski C, Simanton Holland W, Le C, Severson D, Duman-Scheel M: Whole-mount in situ hybridization for analysis of gene expression during Aedes aegypti development. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010, 2010 (10): pdb prot5509-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemons A, Haugen M, Le C, Mori A, Tomchaney M, Severson DW, Duman-Scheel M: siRNA-mediated gene targeting in Aedes aegypti embryos reveals that frazzled regulates vector mosquito CNS development. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e16730-10.1371/journal.pone.0016730.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haugen M, Flannery E, Tomchaney M, Mori A, Behura SK, Severson DW, Duman-Scheel M: Semaphorin-1a is required for Aedes aegypti embryonic nerve cord development. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21694-10.1371/journal.pone.0021694.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Behura SK, Haugen M, Flannery E, Sarro J, Tessier CR, Severson DW, Duman-Scheel M: Comparative genomic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster and vector mosquito developmental genes. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21504-10.1371/journal.pone.0021504.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goltsev Y, Hsiong W, Lanzaro G, Levine M: Different combinations of gap repressors for common stripes in Anopheles and Drosophila embryos. Dev Biol. 2004, 275: 435-446. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Juhn J, Juhn J, James AA: oskar gene expression in the vector mosquitoes, Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2006, 15: 363-372. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00655.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro JM: Blood-feeding arthropods: live syringes or invertebrate pharmacologists?. Infect Agents Dis. 1995, 4: 143-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valenzuela JG: High-throughput approaches to study salivary proteins and genes from vectors of disease. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002, 32: 1199-1209. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00083-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andrew DJ, Henderson KD, Seshaiah P: Salivary gland development in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev. 2000, 92: 5-17. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00321-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams EW, Vining MS, Andrew DJ: Constructing an organ: the Drosophila salivary gland as a model for tube formation. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13: 247-254. 10.1016/S0962-8924(03)00055-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horsfall WFH, Morettia L, Larsen J: Bionomics and Embryology of the Inland Floodwater Mosquito Aedes vexans. 1973, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
- Christophers SR: Aedes aegypti, The Yellow Fever Mosquito: Its Life History, Bionomics, and Structure. 1960, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Patel NH: Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole-mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Meth Cell Biol. 1994, 44: 445-487.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Konikoff C, Van Emden B, Busick C, Davis KT, Ji S, Wu LW, Ramos H, Brody T, Panchanathan S, Ye J, Karr TL, Gerold K, McCutchan M, Newfeld SJ: FlyExpress: visual mining of spatiotemporal patterns for genes and publications in Drosophila embryogenesis. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 3319-3320. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr567.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konikoff CE, Karr TL, McCutchan M, Newfeld SJ, Kumar S: Comparison of embryonic expression within multigene families using the FlyExpress discovery platform reveals more spatial than temporal divergence. Dev Dyn. 2012, 241: 150-160. 10.1002/dvdy.22749.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smedley D, Haider S, Ballester B, Holland R, London D, Thorisson G, Kasprzyk A: BioMart–biological queries made easy. BMC Genom. 2009, 10: 22-10.1186/1471-2164-10-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawson D, Arensburger P, Atkinson P, Besansky NJ, Bruggner RV, Butler R, Campbell KS, Christophides GK, Christley S, Dialynas E, Hammond M, Hill CA, Konopinski N, Lobo NF, MacCallum RM, Madey G, Megy K, Meyer J, Redmond S, Severson DW, Stinson EO, Topalis P, Birney E, Gelbart WM, Kafatos FC, Louis C, Collins FH: VectorBase: a data resource for invertebrate vector genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D583-D587. 10.1093/nar/gkn857.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams EW, Andrew DJ: CrebA regulates secretory activity in the Drosophila salivary gland and epidermis. Development. 2005, 132: 2743-2758. 10.1242/dev.01863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel N: In Situ Hybridization to Whole Mount Drosophila Embryos. 1996, New York: Wiley-LissGoogle Scholar
- Davis C: A comparative study of larval embryogenesis in the mosquito Culex fatigans wiedemann (diptera: culicidae) and the sheep-fly Lucilia sericata meigen (diptera: calliphoridae). Aust J Zool. 1967, 15: 547-579. 10.1071/ZO9670547.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parthasarathy R, Gopinathan KP: Comparative analysis of the development of the mandibular salivary glands and the labial silk glands in the mulberry silkworm, Bombyx mori. Gene Expr Patterns. 2005, 5: 323-339. 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.10.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kokubo H, Ueno K, Amanai K, Suzuki Y:Involvement of theBombyxScr gene in development of the embryonic silk gland.Dev Biol. 1997, 186: 46-57. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duman-Scheel M, Patel NH: Analysis of molecular marker expression reveals neuronal homology in distantly related arthropods. Development. 1999, 126: 2327-2334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duman-Scheel M, Clark SM, Grunow ET, Hasley AO, Hill BL, Simanton WL: Delayed onset of midline netrin expression in Artemia franciscana coincides with commissural axon growth and provides evidence for homology of midline cells in distantly related arthropods. Evol Dev. 2007, 9: 131-140. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00144.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simanton W, Clark S, Clemons A, Jacowski C, Farrell-VanZomeren A, Beach P, Browne WE, Duman-Scheel M: Conservation of arthropod midline netrin accumulation revealed with a cross-reactive antibody provides evidence for midline cell homology. Evol Dev. 2009, 11: 260-268. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00328.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kokoza VA, Raikhel AS: Targeted gene expression in the transgenic Aedes aegypti using the binary Gal4-UAS system. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2011, 41: 637-644. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.04.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynd A, Lycett GJ: Development of the bi-partite Gal4-UAS system in the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e31552-10.1371/journal.pone.0031552.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.