- Open Access
Gene profiling of head mesoderm in early zebrafish development: insights into the evolution of cranial mesoderm
© The Author(s) 2019
- Received: 9 November 2018
- Accepted: 26 June 2019
- Published: 6 July 2019
The evolution of the head was one of the key events that marked the transition from invertebrates to vertebrates. With the emergence of structures such as eyes and jaws, vertebrates evolved an active and predatory life style and radiated into diversity of large-bodied animals. These organs are moved by cranial muscles that derive embryologically from head mesoderm. Compared with other embryonic components of the head, such as placodes and cranial neural crest cells, our understanding of cranial mesoderm is limited and is restricted to few species.
Here, we report the expression patterns of key genes in zebrafish head mesoderm at very early developmental stages. Apart from a basic anterior–posterior axis marked by a combination of pitx2 and tbx1 expression, we find that most gene expression patterns are poorly conserved between zebrafish and chick, suggesting fewer developmental constraints imposed than in trunk mesoderm. Interestingly, the gene expression patterns clearly show the early establishment of medial–lateral compartmentalisation in zebrafish head mesoderm, comprising a wide medial zone flanked by two narrower strips.
In zebrafish head mesoderm, there is no clear molecular regionalisation along the anteroposterior axis as previously reported in chick embryos. In contrast, the medial–lateral regionalisation is formed at early developmental stages. These patterns correspond to the distinction between paraxial mesoderm and lateral plate mesoderm in the trunk, suggesting a common groundplan for patterning head and trunk mesoderm. By comparison of these expression patterns to that of amphioxus homologues, we argue for an evolutionary link between zebrafish head mesoderm and amphioxus anteriormost somites.
- Head mesoderm
- Cranial paraxial mesoderm
- Cranial lateral mesoderm
- Pharyngeal mesoderm
- Anterior lateral plate mesoderm
- Cardiopharyngeal field
- Head segmentation
The head is one of the most elaborate structures in the vertebrate body, formed through the combination and interaction of cells with different embryonic origins. Several of the characteristic structures of the head, such as the jaws, facial bones and special sense organs, are derived embryologically from cranial neural crest cells (CNCs) and epidermal placodes. Both CNCs and placodes are regarded as unique to vertebrates (although putative precursors, without the same developmental fates, have been identified in urochordates, the sister group to vertebrates [1–3]). Consequently, the vertebrate head has been argued to be an evolutionarily novel structure, with the emergence of the ‘New Head’ core to vertebrate origins and evolution . In contrast, the muscles and braincase in the craniofacial region are mostly derived from head mesoderm, not from CNCs or placodes. Mesoderm has a very long evolutionary history, dating back to the origin of bilaterian animals or even before  and is not specific to vertebrates. The New Head hypothesis  did not argue that whole vertebrate head was a brand new structure in evolution, and mesoderm can be considered an ‘old part’ of the ‘New Head’. Nonetheless, head mesoderm has undergone its own evolutionary transformations. Mesodermal tissues in the vertebrate head and body are organised quite differently. To understand the evolution of the vertebrate head, therefore, we must consider not just CNCs and placodes, but also the major organisational changes that took place in mesoderm.
The head mesoderm of vertebrates comprises different mesodermal populations, namely prechordal, cranial paraxial and (at least in some vertebrates) cranial lateral mesoderm (also called the pharyngeal mesoderm) . At an early stage of development, the prechordal mesoderm is located anterior (rostral) to the notochord and beneath the neural tube and is also called prechordal plate. This region of mesoderm is unique in being unpaired and axial. The cranial paraxial mesoderm is, in terms of position, the anteriormost part of the paraxial mesoderm that lies in two strips along the anterior–posterior axis of the entire vertebrate body, on either side of the notochord. However, while paraxial mesoderm is divided into transient repeated units (somites) in most of the body, these are not obvious in the cranial paraxial mesoderm. Instead, in the head region the paraxial mesoderm forms a solid block of cells either side of the notochord. The evolutionary origin of this difference between head and trunk has been hotly debated and is unresolved . Cranial lateral mesoderm lies more laterally and ventrally, close to the pharynx, but is not clearly distinguished by any morphological boundary at early stages of development. As development proceeds, the prechordal mesoderm is displaced caudally and laterally by growth of the anterior neural plate and subsumed into the rest of the cranial mesoderm.
In vertebrate embryos that have been extensively studied, the head mesoderm is not clearly segmented. This is in contrast to the trunk region of vertebrates where the paraxial mesoderm is segmented to form somites. In amphioxus, a marine invertebrate animal closely related to vertebrates, the paraxial mesoderm shows clear segmentation all the way from head to tail. This contrast between amphioxus and vertebrates creates a conundrum. Is the amphioxus condition secondarily modified, with an unsegmented anterior region having evolved into a segmented region, perhaps by co-option of cyclical patterning mechanisms? Or was the head mesoderm originally segmented in the ancestor of vertebrates [7, 8]? If the latter, traces of cryptic segmentation might still be detectable in the cranial mesoderm of living vertebrates. Three lines of evidence have been proposed in favour of such cryptic segmentation, although confusingly each favours a different number of segments. First, scanning electron microscopy suggested the presence of either four or seven subtle pairs of ‘whorls’ of mesenchymal cells in cranial mesoderm [9–12], although these findings have been controversial and difficult to replicate. Second, waves of cyclical gene expression associated with somitic segmentation suggest possibly two repeated units in cranial mesoderm of chick embryos [13, 14]. And third, classical histological examination of elasmobranch embryos, such as sharks and rays, detects three clear epithelial cavities in cranial mesoderm, a finding long regarded as reflecting original segmentation in vertebrate head [15, 16]. These head cavities are not detected in all vertebrates, however, and recent molecular studies have revealed gene expression similarities to cranial mesoderm of amniotes rather than to shark somites, suggesting they may be a secondary peculiarity and not a reflection of ancestral segmentation . In summary, it is still unclear whether the cranial mesoderm of vertebrates evolved from a segmented state and how it may relate to segmentation in amphioxus.
Additional clues to cranial mesoderm origins could come from considering its intrinsic regionalisation. Studies on the early subdivision of the vertebrate head mesoderm have been dominated by research using bird embryos, including a long series of classic transplantation experiments using quail-chick chimeras and labelling studies using DiI labelling or retroviruses to trace cell fates [18–22]. More recently, the molecular subdivision of the head mesoderm prior to the onset of differentiation has been studied in detail . The restricted expression of genes such as Pitx2 in the anterior and Tbx1 in the posterior region reveals that anterior–posterior regionalisation does exist in the morphologically uniform head mesoderm, although the gene expression boundaries for these markers are imprecise and expression patterns overlap . Indications of regionalisation in the chick head mesoderm are further shown by expression and functional analysis of genes encoding components of signalling cascades, notably members of the retinoic acid (RA), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathways .
Thus far, investigations into gene expression in vertebrate head mesoderm development have been largely limited to amniotes (such as birds and mammals), plus more recently elasmobranchs and lamprey. In contrast, there have been fewer studies into the molecular development of the cranial mesoderm of teleost fish, particularly as might be relevant to understanding regionalisation or segmentation. Genes have been reported to be expressed in zebrafish head mesoderm, but these have not been studied comparatively from the view point of evolution and development. Particularly in zebrafish, the anterior lateral plate mesoderm (ALPM) has been extensively examined in studies focused on haematopoietic, endothelial and cardiogenic cells [26, 27]; however, the relationship between ALPM and cranial lateral mesoderm is not clearly resolved.
In this study, we examined the spatial expression of genes encoding transcription factors and molecules involved in signalling cascade in the zebrafish head mesoderm with particular focus on early developmental stages. We use these data to discuss differences and similarities between the head mesoderm between zebrafish, other vertebrates and amphioxus and to address the evolution of the vertebrate head mesoderm.
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were kept under standard laboratory conditions at 28.5 °C in a 12/12 h light/dark cycle in the fish facility at the University of Manchester, UK. The zebrafish AB line was used for obtaining wild-type embryos. After collecting embryos from natural mating, they were kept in E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, 0.0001% methylene blue) at 28.5 °C. Embryos after 75% epiboly (75E) were staged as hours post-fertilisation (hpf) or as somite stages (ss) . After reaching the target developmental stages (8hpf/75E, 10hpf/bud, 11hpf/3ss, 11.67hpf/5ss, 12.5hpf/7ss, 13.5hpf/9ss and 15hpf/12ss), zebrafish embryos were dechorionated manually and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4 °C, followed by dehydration in 25%, 50%, 75% of methanol in PBS, and were kept in 100% methanol at -20 °C until use.
In situ hybridisation
Whole-mount in situ hybridisation (WISH) was performed using digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled RNA probes as previously described . Before hybridisation, embryos were rehydrated in PBS. Zebrafish total RNA was isolated from bud stage embryos using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and the template cDNA used for PCR was prepared from extracted RNA using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen). For the preparation of RNA probes, DNA fragments of marker genes (gsc, pitx2, isl1, foxc1a, fsta, tbx1, cyp26c1, alx1 and tbx20 with sizes 750 to 994 bp; Additional file 1) were amplified by RT-PCR and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega). DIG-labelled RNA probes were synthesised by in vitro transcription from linearised plasmids except for fsta and cyp26c1, which were generated directly from PCR products using T7 RNA polymerase . The pitx2 probe used in this study can detect pitx2a and pixt2c isoforms . For imaging, embryos were re-fixed in 4% PFA/PBST (1X PBS with 0.1% Tween-20), mounted in glycerol and imaged using a Leica DFC 7000T digital camera attached to a Leica M165 FC compound microscope. All images were processed by Leica Application Suite X.
Multi-probe fluorescence in situ hybridisation
Triple-colour in situ hybridisation was conducted using in situ hybridization chain reaction (HCR) v3.0 technology . DNA probe sets for zebrafish foxc1a, tbx1 and tbx20 genes were generated by Molecular Instruments, Inc (CA, USA). In situ HCR was performed following the standard protocol for zebrafish embryos  except that the probe concentration was increased to 10 nM. Zebrafish embryos fixed at 3ss were used in the experiment without proteinase K treatment. Each mRNA signal was amplified and labelled by Alexa Fluor 546 for foxc1a, Alexa Fluor 647 for tbx1 and Alexa Fluor 488 for tbx20, respectively.
A Leica TCS SP8 AOBS inverted confocal microscope equipped with a 40X/1.30 oil objective and 0.75X confocal zoom was used to image whole-mount zebrafish embryos and sections. Each embryo was carefully embedded in 1% agarose gel before imaging. The confocal settings were: pinhole 1AU, scan speed 400 Hz unidirectional, format 512X512. Images were collected using HyD detectors with the following detection mirror settings: Alexa Fluor 488, 494-540 nm; Alexa Fluor 546, 561-640 nm; Alexa Fluor 647, 657-747 nm using the white light laser with 490 nm (25%), 556 nm (30%) and 650 nm (25%) laser lines, respectively. All images were collected sequentially. When acquiring 3D optical stacks, the confocal software was used to determine the optimal number of Z sections. Only the maximum intensity projections of these 3D stacks are shown in the results.
Cryosection of zebrafish embryos
After WISH, stained embryos were rinsed in 1X PBS and immersed in 15% sucrose/PBS at room temperature for 1.5 h. Embryos were then transferred into 20% gelatin/15% sucrose overnight. Embryos were embedded in a mould containing 20% gelatin and left on dry ice for 2 h before being transferred to the cryostat. Blocks were sectioned at 12 μm thickness and collected onto Superfrost Plus (VWR international) slides. Sections were mounted under a glass coverslip in ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen).
Relatively few genes have been reported with spatial expression in cranial mesoderm of vertebrates or the anterior somites of amphioxus. We selected nine genes: seven encoding putative transcription factors and two encoding components of cell–cell signalling pathways. Although information exists concerning expression of several of these in zebrafish, our goal was to obtain detailed descriptions of spatio-temporal gene expression in parallel and enable accurate comparison to expression patterns reported for other vertebrates and amphioxus.
Gene expression in anterior head mesoderm at early developmental stages
We first consider gene expression in the prechordal mesoderm of zebrafish. Prechordal mesoderm cells are derived from anterior hypoblast (mesendoderm) during zebrafish gastrulation  and undergo migration as a group of cells from the germ ring margin towards the animal pole . The most anterior part of the prechordal plate forms a prominent bulge called the polster at the bud stage occurring at 10 h post-fertilisation (10hpf).
The pitx2 homeobox gene is one of the downstream targets of gsc in the prechordal plate . At the 75% epiboly stage (75E), the pitx2 gene is already expressed in the prechordal plate (Fig. 1Ci, Di) and becomes consolidated to the most anterior regions from the bud stage onwards (Fig. 1Cii, Dii), with clear and strong expression becoming limited to the polster from 3ss onwards (Fig. 1Ciii–v, Diii–v). From the 9ss (Fig. 1Cvi–vii, Dvi–vii), the polster forms a U-shaped mesendodermal structure in front of the boundary of the anterior neural plate . In contrast to reported expression of Pitx2 in chick embryos , we detect no zebrafish pitx2 expression in the cranial paraxial mesoderm at any developmental stages examined.
islet1 (isl1) is a marker of the cardiac progenitors in the secondary heart field [39, 40] but is also expressed in the anterior prechordal plate . We detect weak expression of isl1 in the most anterior prechordal region around 75E (Fig. 1Ei, Fi) with the signal becoming stronger and localising to the U-shaped polster over next few hours (Fig. 1Eii–iv, Fii–iv). Like pitx2 gene, isl1 mRNA expression is not detected in cranial paraxial mesoderm; unlike pitx2, the isl1 expression signal fades markedly by 12ss (Fig. 1Ev–vii, Fv–vii).
Gene expression pattern in zebrafish head mesoderm in three bilateral strips
In zebrafish, the paraxial mesendoderm derives from bilateral territories either side of the shield [42, 43]. It develops by convergent extension during gastrulation , and its most anterior part becomes the cranial paraxial mesoderm .
Zebrafish foxc1a and foxc1b are duplicate genes homologous to amniote Foxc1, a member of the forkhead box transcription factor family. Zebrafish foxc1a is reported to be expressed in the presomitic mesoderm, developing somites, adaxial cells and head mesoderm . Mouse Foxc1 (formerly known as Mf1) and chick Foxc1 (reported as cFKH-1) are also expressed in the cranial paraxial mesoderm [46, 47]. Interestingly, distribution of both zebrafish and mouse foxc1a/Foxc1 is graded along the mediolateral axis, with highest levels closest to the midline.
Zebrafish follistatin A (fsta) is one of the two follistatin genes homologous to amphibian Follistatin  encoding a Spemann organiser-specific secreted antagonist of BMP2/4. In zebrafish, fsta has the same dorsalising property as the Xenopus homologue, but is not reported to be expressed in the organiser region .
In our analysis, fsta mRNA is detected at the bud stage in the paraxial mesoderm (Fig. 2Dii, Eii). As embryogenesis progresses, expression domain of fsta in the cranial paraxial mesoderm becomes more constricted (Fig. 2Dii–iv, arrows). In addition to the mesoderm, fsta is expressed in the optic vesicles, the midbrain and the otic vesicles at later stages (Fig. 2Dv–vii).
The tbx1 gene encodes a member of the large family of T-box transcription factors. In humans, hemizygous loss of Tbx1 has been suggested to be a major contributor to the cardiovascular/pharyngeal defects in DiGeorge syndrome, with similar phenotypes evident in mouse mutants [50–52] and the zebrafish van gogh mutant (vgo; caused by tbx1 mutation) . vgo also shows the lack of branchiomeric muscles that are derived from pharyngeal mesoderm.
cyp26c1 is one of three zebrafish paralogues encoding Cyp26 enzymes. Cyp26 enzymes are members of the P450 family proteins and control RA signalling by promoting the degradation of RA . In chick embryos, Cyp26c1 is expressed in the anterior cranial paraxial mesoderm from early development (Hamburger–Hamilton stage [HH] 5) and involved in the formation of the primary anterior–posterior axis in the head mesoderm .
As shown in Fig. 3Dii, zebrafish cyp26c1 is expressed from the bud stage onwards, at the lateral margin (black arrows in Fig. 3Dii–iii) of the cranial paraxial mesoderm where foxc1a is expressed, as a pair of bilateral two strips as previously described (formerly named as cyp26d1) . These cyp26c1-expressing longitudinal regions are located in the same position as the tbx1-expressing strips until 7ss (Fig. 3Dii–v); the bilateral strips move inward at later stages (Fig. 3Dvi–vii). A stronger expression is also observed around presumptive rhombomere 2/4 (Fig. 3Dii) and in rhombomere 2, 4 and 6 from 3ss onwards (Fig. 3Diii–vii, Fiii–vii).
alx1 is a member of the Alx homeobox gene family . In chick, a paralogous gene, Alx4, was demonstrated to be a marker gene of anterior cranial paraxial mesoderm . We previously cloned and examined the expression of alx4a and alx4b, the zebrafish orthologues of chick Alx4, but found they were not expressed in the head mesoderm at early developmental stages . Later alx4a and alx4b are expressed in the mandible and the hyoid arch, respectively.
In contrast to alx4a/b, we found that alx1 is expressed in the lateral margin of the cranial paraxial mesoderm (Fig. 3Gii–iv, Hii–iv, Iii–iv) where tbx1 and cyp26c1 are expressed. From 3ss onwards, a second cell population expressing alx1 is also detected, marking a region medial, dorsal and posterior to the cranial mesoderm bilateral strips; we previously showed  that these are CNCs derived from the midbrain (Fig. 3Giii, Hiii, Iiii, asterisks). The expression of alx1 in the two strips of cranial mesoderm becomes weaker and eventually diminished by 9ss while the signal in CNCs becomes stronger and migrates forward (Fig. 3Giii–vii, Hii–vii). Later at 48hpf, alx1 is expressed in the distal end of the mandible arch .
In this study, we examined the expression of key genes in zebrafish head mesoderm at early developmental stages. Expression of genes encoding transcription factors and components of signalling pathways have previously been analysed in detail in chick embryos [24, 25] and shark head mesoderm . Comparing these taxa facilitates insights into the development and evolution of vertebrate head mesoderm.
Conservation and divergence in vertebrate head mesoderm evolution
Posterior to the head, in the body or trunk region, gene expression patterns are remarkably congruent between vertebrate classes. Furthermore, apart from Hox genes, there is little molecular regionalisation along the anteroposterior axis of the somitic mesoderm. In contrast, previous work has shown the head mesoderm has clear molecular regionalisation along the anteroposterior axis prior to differentiation in chick embryos. Bothe and Dietrich  showed that the anterior region of the chick head mesoderm is marked by the expression of Pitx2, Alx4, MyoR, and the posterior part of head mesoderm by Tbx1 and Twist genes. In the current study of zebrafish cranial development, we also find the most anterior region of the head mesoderm (prechordal plate) strongly expresses the pitx2 gene during early development, anterior to a (cranial lateral) mesoderm region expressing tbx1. Therefore, a basic Pitx2 anterior/Tbx1 posterior axis is conserved between chick , shark  and zebrafish head mesoderm.
There are, however, some differences between species. Although zebrafish pitx2 is strongly expressed in the most anterior part of the head mesoderm, its expression is restricted to prechordal mesoderm coincident with markers such as gsc  and isl1 . Unlike chick Pitx2, zebrafish pitx2 is not expressed in the cranial paraxial mesoderm marked by foxc1a throughout the development (Fig. 1C, D). Alx4 is another anterior marker of chick head mesoderm , but we find that the zebrafish orthologues, alx4a and alx4b, are not expressed in the head mesoderm . Instead, a paralogous gene, zebrafish alx1, is expressed in cranial mesoderm, at the lateral margin of the paraxial region (Fig. 3Gii–iv). A third difference concerns cyp26c1, encoding a key enzyme for establishment of the RA anteroposterior gradient, which in chick is extensively expressed in anterior cranial mesoderm but in zebrafish is restricted to the lateral margin like alx1 (Fig. 3Dii–v).
It is difficult to correlate precisely the developmental processes underpinning head mesoderm formation between different vertebrate classes since the mechanics of axis formation, developmental timing and topological relations between embryonic components differ, especially at early developmental stages. Even so, the differences in expression patterns of genes encoding transcription factors and signalling pathways between amniotes and teleosts suggest there are fewer developmental constraints imposed within the vertebrate head mesoderm than the trunk mesoderm. This may reflect versatility of head mesoderm to adapt to environmental differences, alongside diversification of craniofacial structures in evolution, and may be related to absence of overt mesodermal segmentation. Furthermore, this versatility may serve to make inference of ancestral gene expressions difficult.
Mediolateral cranial regionalisation reveals similarities to trunk mesoderm
As development proceeds and the zebrafish embryo becomes elongated, these three pairs of bilateral strips shift inward and become squeezed. Indeed, from middle segmentation stages around 9ss, the strips are no longer clearly separated. Thus, the expression patterns described are visible only for a limited time window between 10hpf and 12.5hpf. The existence of a distinct central region (red stripes in Fig. 6), expressing tbx1, cyp26c1 and alx1, between the cranial paraxial mesoderm and the ALPM is consistent with a previous report showing that cyp26c1 is expressed medial to the ALPM (marked by nkx2.5-expression) with partial overlap at a slightly later stage . Similarly, a recent live imaging analysis using tbx1 reporter transgenic lines showed that the tbx1-expressing domain is medial to draculin (drl)-expressing ALPM cells, with some overlap . Taken together, these data and our result (Fig. 5) reveal medial–lateral regionalisation in zebrafish head mesoderm for a limited time window at early developmental stages. In particular, in addition to the cranial paraxial mesoderm marked by foxc1a and the ALPM marked by tbx20, there is an intermediate transitional zone marked by tbx1. We suggest this region represents the cranial lateral mesoderm previously proposed . The cardiopharyngeal field  may include both the ALPM and the cranial lateral mesoderm or could be separated into cardio-(tbx20-expressing) and pharyngeal-(alx1/tbx1-expressing) regions.
It is possible that the mediolateral regionalisation of the cranial mesoderm is comparable to the distinction between paraxial (somitic) and lateral plate mesoderm in the trunk region of vertebrates. This view conforms to the anatomical concept originally proposed by van Wijhe  based on observation of shark embryos (see also Kuratani and Adachi ). Such a view, however, would contrast with arguments that amniote head mesoderm does not have lateral plate or visceral structural components exclusive of cardiovascular tissue . With regard to this issue, it is worth revisiting early transplantation experiments using quail-chick chimeras that traced cell fate in the head mesoderm . In this study, Couly et al. showed that the cranial paraxial mesoderm in 3ss avian embryos can be separated in two longitudinal regions, medial and lateral to the notochord. The medial cranial mesodermal region was shown to give rise to extraocular muscles, whereas the lateral region yields branchiomeric muscles, a finding in line with van Wijhe’s view and our zebrafish early embryo data. However, in experiments using later stage embryos (HH9-10, 7-10ss), the mediolateral regionalisation was rearranged to a rostrocaudal sequence; that is, the anterior part of the head mesoderm gave rise to extraocular muscles and the posterior to branchiomeric muscles , possibly due to the migration and change of position of myogenic precursors. Insight into how branchiomeric-fated cranial cells relate to the molecular zonation comes from recent tracing studies using transgenic reporter lines in zebrafish. Live imaging analysis traced tbx1 reporter-expressing cells from the cranial lateral mesoderm/ALPM and demonstrated that they migrate to the pharyngeal arches and to the heart by 36hpf . Similarly, drl-expressing cells in the anterior region are characterised to give rise to blood cells, vascular cells and the second heart field as well as branchial muscles . Therefore, both gene expression analysis and cell fate studies converge on the view that there are clear medial and lateral regions of zebrafish (and possibly chick) head mesoderm primarily established at early stages and that these can be usefully compared to paraxial (somitic) and lateral plate mesoderm of the trunk. From this point of view, the paraxial mesoderm is continuous from head to tail in early zebrafish embryos, suggestive of a common evolutionary origin for head and trunk mesoderm.
Evolutionary origin of vertebrate head mesoderm
Paraxial mesoderm in both cranial and trunk regions is marked by foxc1a/b in zebrafish (; this study) and by Foxc1 in chick and mouse [46, 47]. Similarly, the amphioxus homologous gene FoxC is expressed in the somites all along the body by mid-late neurulae (dark blue areas in Fig. 7) . With regard to the outermost lateral mesoderm of zebrafish, tbx20 (; this study) and nkx2.5  are established ALPM markers implicated in cardiac development; the amphioxus orthologues Tbx20  and AmphiNk2-tin [72, 73] are expressed in the ventral mesoderm (green in Fig. 7). In our study, the mesoderm lying between the cranial paraxial mesoderm and ALPM is marked by the combination of tbx1 (Fig. 3A), cyp26c1 (Fig. 3D) and alx1 (Fig. 3G) expression. Two homologous amphioxus genes, Tbx1/10  and Alx , are expressed in the ventral half of somites and in more ventral mesoderm (red areas in Fig. 7); amphioxus Cyp26 genes are expressed in somites but not in the ventral mesoderm . Interestingly, the expression of the amphioxus homologues (Tbx1/10, Alx, Cyp26) is limited to mesoderm in the anterior part of the body.
Thus far, the middle region of the three strips has been confirmed visually only in zebrafish embryos. Although a quail-chick transplantation study  indicates the existence of a homologous region in chick embryos at 3ss, chick Tbx1 expression has not been detected in the cranial lateral mesoderm at a comparable developmental stage . Interestingly, Xenopus Tbx1 shows a dynamic expression pattern reminiscent of zebrafish tbx1, moving from the paraxial/lateral mesoderm boundary to more posterior pharyngeal region , which suggests the ‘three-strip’ pattern of zebrafish head mesoderm is likely to reflect the ancestral condition for vertebrates (or at least Osteichthyes). This mediolateral compartmentalisation is detectable only in a very limited time window, and the detailed expression study at early developmental stages of vertebrates from outside the Osteichthyes, such as dogfish, will be informative to infer the head mesoderm organisation of vertebrate ancestors.
In summary, the three bilateral strips of gene expression in zebrafish head mesoderm are remarkably similar to the expression patterns of three sets of homologous amphioxus genes, staggered from paraxial to ventral in the anterior mesoderm of the body. This argues that the separation of paraxial and lateral mesoderm, and possibly that of somatic and visceral derivatives, was most likely already established in the common chordate ancestor. Furthermore, these distinctions extended to the ‘head’ end of the body, which deploys a distinct set of pattering genes to the more posterior or trunk regions.
These data do not reveal whether the common ancestor of amphioxus and vertebrates, the ancestor of all living chordates, had mesodermal segmentation in the head region. However, they do emphasise remarkable molecular similarities between the anteriormost (segmented) mesoderm of amphioxus and the cranial (unsegmented) mesoderm of vertebrates. These two regions are almost certainly homologous. We argue that vertebrate cranial mesoderm is not a novelty, nor an evolutionary transformation of a single segment. Instead, either the vertebrate head mesoderm evolved from an extensive segmented region by loss of somitic boundaries, or the anteriormost amphioxus somites were secondarily imposed during evolution on an extensive unsegmented mesodermal region.
The expression patterns of key genes in zebrafish head mesoderm have some differences from those of other vertebrate species previously reported. Unlike chick embryos, there is no clear anteroposterior regionalisation in the cranial paraxial mesoderm of zebrafish. In contrast, medial–lateral compartmentalisation in zebrafish head mesoderm is established at early developmental stages, as indicated by expression patterns of three sets of marker genes resolving into three bilateral longitudinal strips. This mediolateral regionalisation of the cranial mesoderm is comparable to the distinction between paraxial and lateral plate mesoderm in the trunk, suggesting that head and trunk mesoderm of vertebrates share a common evolutionary origin.
Moreover, the three bilateral strips of gene expression in zebrafish head mesoderm are comparable to the expression patterns of three sets of homologous amphioxus genes. Considering the data together, we argue that the separation of paraxial mesoderm and lateral mesoderm was already established in the common chordate ancestor prior to the separation of head and trunk in vertebrates, suggesting that the anteriormost somites of amphioxus and the cranial mesoderm of vertebrates are homologous.
We thank Tom Pettini and Matthew Ronshaugen for their advice and support for image analysis.
This study was funded by the Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant (RPG-2014-370).
TT and PWHH conceived and supervised the study; TT and HW designed experiments; HW performed experiments with help of TT; HW and TT analysed data; TT, HW and PWHH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Zebrafish embryos used in the current study do not require an ethical approval.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Jeffery WR, Strickler AG, Yamamoto Y. Migratory neural crest-like cells form body pigmentation in a urochordate embryo. Nature. 2004;431:696–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abitua PB, Gainous TB, Kaczmarczyk AN, Winchell CJ, Hudson C, Kamata K, et al. The pre-vertebrate origins of neurogenic placodes. Nature. 2015;524:462–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patthey C, Schlosser G, Shimeld SM. The evolutionary history of vertebrate cranial placodes—I: cell type evolution. Dev Biol. 2014;389:82–97.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gans C, Northcutt RG. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head. Science. 1983;220:268–73.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Burton PM. Insights from diploblasts; the evolution of mesoderm and muscle. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol. 2008;310B:5–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambasivan R, Kuratani S, Tajbakhsh S. An eye on the head: the development and evolution of craniofacial muscles. Development. 2011;138:2401–15.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kuratani S. Is the vertebrate head segmented?—evolutionary and developmental considerations. Integr Comp Biol. 2008;48:647–57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holland LZ, Holland ND, Gilland E. Amphioxus and the evolution of head segmentation. Integr Comp Biol. 2008;48:630–46.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meier S. Development of the chick embryo mesoblast. Formation of the embryonic axis and establishment of the metameric pattern. Dev Biol. 1979;73:24–45.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anderson CB, Meier S. The influence of the metameric pattern in the mesoderm on migration of cranial neural crest cells in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1981;85:385–402.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meier S, Tam PP. Metameric pattern development in the embryonic axis of the mouse. I. Differentiation of the cranial segments. Differentiation. 1982;21:95–108.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Martindale MQ, Meier S, Jacobson AG. Mesodermal metamerism in the teleost, oryzias latipes (the medaka). J Morphol. 1987;193:241–52.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dubrulle J, Pourquié O. From head to tail: links between the segmentation clock and antero-posterior patterning of the embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:519–23.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jouve C, Iimura T, Pourquie O. Onset of the segmentation clock in the chick embryo: evidence for oscillations in the somite precursors in the primitive streak. Development. 2002;129:1107–17.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Balfour FM. The development of elasmobranch fishes. J Anat Physiol. 1877;11:406–90.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goodrich ES. Studies on the structure & development of vertebrates. London: Macmillan; 1930.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adachi N, Takechi M, Hirai T, Kuratani S. Development of the head and trunk mesoderm in the dogfish, scyliorhinus torazame: II Comparison of gene expression between the head mesoderm and somites with reference to the origin of the vertebrate head. Evol Dev. 2012;14:257–76.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM. The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras. Development. 1992;114:1–15.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Noden DM. Interactions and fates of avian craniofacial mesenchyme. Development. 1988;103(Suppl):121–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development. 1993;117:409–29.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Evans DJR, Noden DM. Spatial relations between avian craniofacial neural crest and paraxial mesoderm cells. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:1310–25.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hacker A, Guthrie S. A distinct developmental programme for the cranial paraxial mesoderm in the chick embryo. Development. 1998;125:3461–72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schubert FR, Singh AJ, Afoyalan O, Kioussi C, Dietrich S. To roll the eyes and snap a bite: function, development and evolution of craniofacial muscles. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;91:31–44.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bothe I, Dietrich S. The molecular setup of the avian head mesoderm and its implication for craniofacial myogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2845–60.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bothe I, Tenin G, Oseni A, Dietrich S. Dynamic control of head mesoderm patterning. Development. 2011;138:2807–21.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Davidson AJ, Zon LI. The ‘definitive’ (and ‘primitive’) guide to zebrafish hematopoiesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:7233–46.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Peterkin T, Gibson A, Patient R. Common genetic control of haemangioblast and cardiac development in zebrafish. Development. 2009;136:1465–74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:253–310.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thisse C, Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:59–69.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- David R, Wedlich D. PCR-based RNA probes: a quick and sensitive method to improve whole mount embryo in situ hybridizations. Biotechniques. 2001;30:769–72.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Faucourt M, Houliston E, Besnardeau L, Kimelman D, Lepage T. The Pitx2 homeobox protein is required early for endoderm formation and nodal signaling. Dev Biol. 2001;229:287–306.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Choi HMT, Schwarzkopf M, Fornace ME, Acharya A, Artavanis G, Stegmaier J, et al. Third-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: multiplexed, quantitative, sensitive, versatile, robust. Development. 2018;145:dev165753.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi HMT, Calvert CR, Husain N, Huss D, Barsi JC, Deverman BE, et al. Mapping a multiplexed zoo of mRNA expression. Development. 2016;143:3632–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tada M, Heisenberg C-P. Convergent extension: using collective cell migration and cell intercalation to shape embryos. Development. 2012;139:3897–904.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schulte-Merker S, Hammerschmidt M, Beuchle D, Cho KW, De Robertis EM, Nusslein-Volhard C. Expression of zebrafish goosecoid and no tail gene products in wild-type and mutant no tail embryos. Development. 1994;120:843–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stachel SE, Grunwald DJ, Myers PZ. Lithium perturbation and goosecoid expression identify a dorsal specification pathway in the pregastrula zebrafish. Development. 1993;117:1261–74.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Essner JJ, Branford WW, Zhang J, Yost HJ. Mesendoderm and left-right brain, heart and gut development are differentially regulated by pitx2 isoforms. Development. 2000;127:1081–93.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Campione M, Steinbeisser H, Schweickert A, Deissler K, van Bebber F, Lowe LA, et al. The homeobox gene Pitx2: mediator of asymmetric left-right signaling in vertebrate heart and gut looping. Development. 1999;126:1225–34.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Witzel HR, Jungblut B, Choe CP, Crump JG, Braun T, Dobreva G. The LIM protein Ajuba restricts the second heart field progenitor pool by regulating Isl1 activity. Dev Cell. 2012;23:58–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cai C-L, Liang X, Shi Y, Chu P-H, Pfaff SL, Chen J, et al. Isl1 identifies a cardiac progenitor population that proliferates prior to differentiation and contributes a majority of cells to the heart. Dev Cell. 2003;5:877–89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue A, Takahashi M, Hatta K, Hotta Y, Okamoto H. Developmental regulation of Islet-1 mRNA expression during neuronal differentiation in embryonic zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1994;199:1–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kimmel CB, Warga RM, Schilling TF. Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development. 1990;108:581–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warga RM, Kimmel CB. Cell movements during epiboly and gastrulation in zebrafish. Development. 1990;108:569–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pourquié O. Vertebrate somitogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:311–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Topczewska JM, Topczewski J, Solnica-Krezel L, Hogan BL. Sequence and expression of zebrafish foxc1a and foxc1b, encoding conserved forkhead/winged helix transcription factors. Mech Dev. 2001;100:343–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sasaki H, Hogan BL. Differential expression of multiple fork head related genes during gastrulation and axial pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development. 1993;118:47–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buchberger A, Schwarzer M, Brand T, Pabst O, Seidl K, Arnold H-H. Chicken winged-helix transcription factor cFKH-1 prefigures axial and appendicular skeletal structures during chicken embryogenesis. Dev Dyn. 1998;212:94–101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Macqueen DJ, Johnston IA. Evolution of follistatin in teleosts revealed through phylogenetic, genomic and expression analyses. Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:1–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bauer H, Meier A, Hild M, Stachel S, Economides A, Hazelett D, et al. Follistatin and noggin are excluded from the zebrafish organizer. Dev Biol. 1998;204:488–507.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jerome LA, Papaioannou VE. DiGeorge syndrome phenotype in mice mutant for the T-box gene, Tbx1. Nat Genet. 2001;27:286–91.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lindsay EA, Vitelli F, Su H, Morishima M, Huynh T, Pramparo T, et al. Tbx1 haploinsufficiency in the DiGeorge syndrome region causes aortic arch defects in mice. Nature. 2001;410:97–101.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Merscher S, Funke B, Epstein JA, Heyer J, Puech A, Lu MM, et al. TBX1 is responsible for cardiovascular defects in velo-cardio-facial/DiGeorge syndrome. Cell. 2001;104:619–29.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Piotrowski T, Ahn D, Schilling TF, Nair S, Ruvinsky I, Geisler R, et al. The zebrafish van gogh mutation disrupts tbx1, which is involved in the DiGeorge deletion syndrome in humans. Development. 2003;130:5043–52.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rochette-Egly C, Germain P. Dynamic and combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Nucl Recept Signal. 2007;4:e005.Google Scholar
- Gu X, Xu F, Wang X, Gao X, Zhao Q. Molecular cloning and expression of a novel CYP26 gene (cyp26d1) during zebrafish early development. Gene Expr Patterns. 2005;5:733–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McGonnell IM, Graham A, Richardson J, Fish JL, Depew MJ, Dee CT, et al. Evolution of the Alx homeobox gene family: parallel retention and independent loss of the vertebrate Alx3 gene. Evol Dev. 2011;13:343–51.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dee CT, Szymoniuk CR, Mills PE, Takahashi T. Defective neural crest migration revealed by a Zebrafish model of Alx1-related frontonasal dysplasia. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:239–51.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ahn D, Ruvinsky I, Oates AC, Silver LM, Ho RK. tbx20, a new vertebrate T-box gene expressed in the cranial motor neurons and developing cardiovascular structures in zebrafish. Mech Dev. 2000;95:253–8.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Just S, Raphel L, Berger IM, Bühler A, Keßler M, Rottbauer W. Tbx20 Is an essential regulator of embryonic heart growth in zebrafish. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167306.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iio A, Koide M, Hidaka K, Morisaki T. Expression pattern of novel chick T-box gene, Tbx20. Dev Genes Evol. 2001;211:559–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamagishi T, Nakajima Y, Nishimatsu S-I, Nohno T, Ando K, Nakamura H. Expression of tbx20 RNA during chick heart development. Dev Dyn. 2004;230:576–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schier AF, Neuhauss SC, Helde KA, Talbot WS, Driever W. The one-eyed pinhead gene functions in mesoderm and endoderm formation in zebrafish and interacts with no tail. Development. 1997;124:327–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rydeen AB, Waxman JS. Cyp26 enzymes are required to balance the cardiac and vascular lineages within the anterior lateral plate mesoderm. Development. 2014;141:1638–48.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Felker A, Prummel KD, Merks AM, Mickoleit M, Brombacher EC, Huisken J, et al. Continuous addition of progenitors forms the cardiac ventricle in zebrafish. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diogo R, Kelly RG, Christiaen L, Levine M, Ziermann JM, Molnar JL, et al. A new heart for a new head in vertebrate cardiopharyngeal evolution. Nature. 2015;520:466–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Wijhe JW. Über die Mesodermsegmente und die Entwicklung der Nerven des Selachierkopfes. Groningen: Ver Akad Wiss Amsterdam; 1882. p. 1–50.Google Scholar
- Kuratani S, Adachi N. What are head cavities?: A history of studies on vertebrate head segmentation. Zool Sci. 2016;33:213–28.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Noden DM, Trainor PA. Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations. J Anat. 2005;207:575–601.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noden DM. The embryonic origins of avian cephalic and cervical muscles and associated connective tissues. Am J Anat. 1983;168:257–76.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hess C, Prummel KD, Nieuwenhuize S, Parker H, Rogers KW, Kozmikova I, et al. A conserved regulatory program drives emergence of the lateral plate mesoderm. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 2018. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/02/07/261115.full.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2018.
- Kozmik Z, Holland LZ, Schubert M, Lacalli TC, Kreslova J, Vlcek C, et al. Characterization of amphioxusamphivent, an evolutionarily conserved marker for chordate ventral mesoderm. Genesis. 2001;29:172–9.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Holland ND, Venkatesh TV, Holland LZ, Jacobs DK, Bodmer R. Amphink2-tin, an amphioxus homeobox gene expressed in myocardial progenitors: insights into evolution of the vertebrate heart. Dev Biol. 2003;255:128–37.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Onimaru K, Shoguchi E, Kuratani S, Tanaka M. Development and evolution of the lateral plate mesoderm: comparative analysis of amphioxus and lamprey with implications for the acquisition of paired fins. Dev Biol. 2011;359:124–36.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beaster-Jones L, Kaltenbach SL, Koop D, Yuan S, Chastain R, Holland LZ. Expression of somite segmentation genes in amphioxus: a clock without a wavefront? Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:599–611.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schubert M, Holland LZ, Stokes MD, Holland ND. Three amphioxus Wnt genes (AmphiWnt3, AmphiWnt5, and AmphiWnt6) associated with the tail bud: the evolution of somitogenesis in chordates. Dev Biol. 2001;240:262–73.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mansfield JH, Haller E, Holland ND, Brent AE. Development of somites and their derivatives in amphioxus, and implications for the evolution of vertebrate somites. Evodevo. 2015;6:21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aldea D, Leon A, Bertrand S, Escriva H. Expression of Fox genes in the cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Front Ecol Evol. 2015;3:80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen JN, Fishman MC. Zebrafish tinman homolog demarcates the heart field and initiates myocardial differentiation. Development. 1996;122:3809–16.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Belgacem MR, Escande M, Escriva H, Bertrand S. Amphioxus Tbx6/16 and Tbx20 embryonic expression patterns reveal ancestral functions in chordates. Gene Expr Patterns. 2011;11:239–43.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mahadevan NR, Horton AC, Gibson-Brown JJ. Developmental expression of the amphioxus Tbx1/10 gene illuminates the evolution of vertebrate branchial arches and sclerotome. Dev Genes Evol. 2004;214:559–66.PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meulemans D, Bronner-Fraser M. Insights from amphioxus into the evolution of vertebrate cartilage. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e787.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho JE, Theodosiou M, Chen J, Chevret P, Alvarez S, De Lera AR, et al. Lineage-specific duplication of amphioxus retinoic acid degrading enzymes (CYP26) resulted in sub-functionalization of patterning and homeostatic roles. BMC Evol Biol. 2017;17:24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ataliotis P, Ivins S, Mohun TJ, Scambler PJ. XTbx1 is a transcriptional activator involved in head and pharyngeal arch development in Xenopus laevis. Dev Dyn. 2005;232:979–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar