Research | Open | Published:
Development of somites and their derivatives in amphioxus, and implications for the evolution of vertebrate somites
EvoDevovolume 6, Article number: 21 (2015)
Vertebrate somites are subdivided into lineage compartments, each with distinct cell fates and evolutionary histories. Insights into somite evolution can come from studying amphioxus, the best extant approximation of the chordate ancestor. Amphioxus somites have myotome and non-myotome compartments, but development and fates of the latter are incompletely described. Further, while epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is important for most vertebrate somitic lineages, amphioxus somites generally have been thought to remain entirely epithelial. Here, we examined amphioxus somites and derivatives, as well as extracellular matrix of the axial support system, in a series of developmental stages by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and in situ hybridization for collagen expression.
The amphioxus somite differentiates medially into myotome, laterally into the external cell layer (a sub-dermal mesothelium), ventrally into a bud that forms mesothelia of the perivisceral coelom, and ventro-medially into the sclerotome. The sclerotome forms initially as a monolayered cell sheet that migrates between the myotome and the notochord and neural tube; subsequently, this cell sheet becomes double layered and encloses the sclerocoel. Other late developments include formation of the fin box mesothelia from lateral somites and the advent of isolated fibroblasts, likely somite derived, along the myosepta. Throughout development, all cells originating from the non-myotome regions of somites strongly express a fibrillar collagen gene, ColA, and thus likely contribute to extracellular matrix of the dermal and axial connective tissue system.
We provide a revised model for the development of amphioxus sclerotome and fin boxes and confirm previous reports of development of the myotome and lateral somite. In addition, while somite derivatives remain almost entirely epithelial, limited de-epithelialization likely converts some somitic cells into fibroblasts of the myosepta and dermis. Ultrastructure and collagen expression suggest that all non-myotome somite derivatives contribute to extracellular matrix of the dermal and axial support systems. Although amphioxus sclerotome lacks vertebrate-like EMT, it resembles that of vertebrates in position, movement to surround midline structures and into myosepta, and contribution to extracellular matrix of the axial support system. Thus, many aspects of the sclerotome developmental program evolved prior to the origin of the vertebrate mineralized skeleton.
In vertebrates, the somites give rise to musculoskeletal tissues, including the bones and cartilage of the vertebral column and its associated muscles and connective tissue. Somites form via mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of the presomitic mesoderm. Subsequently, epithelial somites undergo EMT and become subdivided into compartments with distinct tissue fates (reviewed in [1,2]). The dermomyotome gives rise to myotome, which contains skeletal muscle progenitors, and to central dermomyotome, which in turn gives rise to the dorsal dermis. Sclerotome contains the progenitors for cartilage and bone of the vertebral column. The sclerotome further subdivides to form syndetome, which gives rise to axial tendons. Somite compartmentalization and tissue fates are largely shared across vertebrates. However, comparison across groups of higher vertebrates reveals substantial variation in the position, relative sizes, and inductive mechanisms of the somitic compartments [1,3-6]. These differences in turn contribute to variation in the position and size of musculoskeletal tissues, which allows functional specializations among different vertebrate groups .
Somites evolved prior to the origin of vertebrates and can be traced back at least to ancestral invertebrate chordates [8,9]. However, the extent to which ancestral somites were compartmentalized, and the evolutionary history of their organization, is unclear. Further, within the chordates, mineralized skeletal tissue is an evolutionary novelty of vertebrates, raising the question of how a compartment of skeletal precursor cells arose. Comparison of vertebrate somites to those of extant, basal taxa can help to address these questions. Here, we examine somite development in a chordate that diverged from the ancestors of vertebrates prior to the origin of skeletal tissue: the cephalochordate amphioxus. The other group of invertebrate chordates, the tunicates, cannot be used in such a comparison, because they have secondarily lost segmentation .
Amphioxus and vertebrates have several features in common, including pharyngeal slits, a dorsal nerve cord and notochord, and segmented axial musculature derived from somites [11,12]. In adult amphioxus (Figure 1), muscle segments (myomeres) extend along the length of the body axis. Although amphioxus lacks skeletal tissue, collagen-based connective tissues with few or no cells are found in the positions where the vertebrate axial skeleton forms. The myomeres are separated by collagenous myosepta that are continuous laterally with the sub-epidermal collagen layer (dermis) and medially to the collagenous layers ensheathing the axially located notochord and nerve cord: the notochordal and perineural sheaths. As myomeres contract sequentially during the undulatory movement of swimming, the generated force is transmitted to the notochord via these axial connective tissues . Cephalochordates, then, most closely represent both the ancestral segmented body plan of vertebrates, and the anatomical features of the most basal somites. The morphology of the adult musculoskeletal system has been extensively studied in amphioxus. However, previous studies of connective tissues and/or the fates of somite derivatives have focused on limited developmental stages [12-18] or the adult stage alone [19-23], and because of this limited sampling, there is as yet no connected account of their development. Therefore, in the present study, we frequently sampled a developing culture of amphioxus, ranging from early embryos through subadults (Figure 2A).
The early stages of amphioxus somite formation are somewhat different from vertebrates. The most anterior somites are produced by evagination from the gut wall (Figure 2B,C,D); those added later form directly from the epithelium surrounding the neurenteric canal (Figure 2F) without the interposition of presomitic mesoderm found in vertebrates [24,25]. The terminology for somite-derived cell lineages within the chordates has not been well standardized, so the terms used here are presented in Table 1. Both Kowalevski  and Hatschek  accurately described the initial division of amphioxus somites into myotome (medial) and non-myotome (lateral) compartments (Figure 2E), but the subsequent behaviors of cells, particularly the latter population, are poorly understood. Although the non-myotome compartment(s) do not give rise to skeleton, Hatschek proposed that they give rise to the axial connective tissue system and consist of two populations. The first, located laterally, differentiates in place into the lateral mesothelial layer that produces the dermis; this has been referred to the dermatome, although its correspondence with vertebrate dermatome has not been clearly established. Hatschek proposed that the second population, located ventro-medially, is homologous to vertebrate sclerotome, evaginates as a hollow diverticulum that migrates toward the midline, and gives rise to the notochordal and perineural sheaths. Hatschek’s version of somite development has been largely accepted [3,12,13,15,28], but sometimes challenged [17,18]; however, it has not been revisited by examining a series of developmental stages, or with molecular data. Further, the ultimate fates amphioxus non-myotome cells have not been shown. Although myotome derivatives have been followed with a molecular marker , no such marker has yet been used to track the non-myotome cells. In addition, it has been proposed that the amphioxus perivisceral coelom and fin box mesothelia arise as epithelial evaginations from the non-myotome compartment of the somite, but this has not yet been clearly demonstrated [30,31].
Here, we examine the development of amphioxus somites in a fine-grained sampling of developmental timepoints. Our aims are to provide a description that can inform models of somite and sclerotome evolution, as well as a foundation upon which future molecular studies of amphioxus somite compartmentalization can build. First, we examined somites and their derivatives in closely spaced samples with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) during the embryonic, larval, and subadult stages. We also examined development of extracellular connective tissue layers, all of which we show form in close apposition to cells derived from non-myotome somite lineages. Finally, we provide evidence that non-myotome somite cells are secretory, connective tissue-producing cells, based on ultrastructure and their expression of the single clade A fibrillar collagen gene of amphioxus (ColA) at all stages of development. In vertebrates, clade A collagen gene family members are expressed in somite-derived connective tissues including the dermis, cartilage, bone, and tendon [32-34]. We propose a revised scheme for amphioxus somite morphogenesis and cell fate and, in the light of these data, compare somite derivatives between amphioxus and vertebrates and consider their possible homologies.
Amphioxus collection and culture
Amphioxus adults were collected from Tampa Bay during the summers of 2010 and 2012 using a shovel and sieve. Adults were induced to spawn in the lab, and embryos and larvae were cultured at 20°C as previously described . Developmental stages were fixed for TEM or in situ hybridization at a dozen time intervals covering the period from the gastrula through the subadult. Such a comprehensive study at the TEM level is a major undertaking, and to keep it within bounds, we limited our coverage to a body region about three-fourths of the way between the anterior and posterior ends of the body (depicted as vertical lines on each animal, Figure 1A). A section at this level avoids the structural complexity of the atrial region as it develops.
For each developmental stage sampled, half a dozen animals were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1% phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) with 0.45 M sucrose for 2 h at room temperature. Specimens were rinsed in three 5-min changes of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) with 0.45 M sucrose and then postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide at 3°C for 1 h. The specimens were then dehydrated in an ethanol series, transferred to propylene oxide, and embedded in LX-112 resin. For orientation, 0.5-μm-thick sections were cut and stained with 1% toluidine blue. For thin sectioning, contrast of gold sections was enhanced with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The following numbers of specimens were observed at each stage: mid gastrula (1), late gastrula (1), early neurula (1), mid-late neurula (3), 2 GS larva (3), 3 GS larva (2), 4 GS larva (1), 5 GS larva (2), 6 GS larva (1), 7/8 GS larva (1), 9 GS larva (1), early metamorphic (3), postmetamorphic juvenile (6), subadult (7).
mRNA in situ hybridization
For embryos and larvae, whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described previously . After probe detection, embryos were incubated in 1 μg/mL DAPI (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min and washed in PBT. Embryos were embedded in gelatin and frozen as described in  and 3-μm sections cut on a Leica cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Larvae were dehydrated through a graded series from PBS to ethanol, equilibrated in 50/50 ethanol/Spurr’s resin in a rocking desiccation chamber, washed 4 × 30 min in Spurr’s resin under desiccation, aligned in rubber molds, and polymerized at 68°C overnight. Spurr’s resin (Sigma EM0300; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions with the following proportions of reagents: 4.1 g ERL, 1.75 g DER, 5.9 g NSA, 0.1 g DMAE. Sections (3 μm) were cut with a glass knife on a (model) microtome or with a tungsten-carbide knife on a rotary microtome (Leica RM225; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For adults, tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned into 10-μm sections, and section in situ hybridization was performed, all as described in . ColA and MLC probes were previously described [29,36]. Specimens were photographed under oil on a Nikon Axiophot microscope with a Nikon DigiSight camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Morphology and fate of the somitic compartments
In this section, we examine the development and positions of the non-myotome lineages throughout development, shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. Some panels in these figures provide overviews of whole somites, while others show details specific to one somite region or derivative. In the text below, we focus on one somite-derived structure at a time and provide a connected account of its development.
A. Development of the sclerotome and the sclerocoel
We first examined development and fates of the ventral part of the somite, which we will hereafter refer to as sclerotome (Table 1; Figures 3, 4, and 5). Somites of mid-neurulae are epithelial spheres. The medial (myotome) cells have already begun to elongate along the medial-lateral axis (Figure 3A) and express muscle markers . In contrast, the non-myotome, which includes ventral (sclerotome) and the lateral (external cell layer) regions, is a continuous, thin epithelium that borders the epidermal ectoderm and dorsal gut tube, respectively. The morphological difference between myotome and non-myotome is already pronounced at this stage (Figure 3A; arrowheads mark the transitions dorsally (black) and ventrally (white); somitocoel is indicated by a black arrow). In late neurulae (Figure 3B,G), myotome cells are further elongated, contain myofibers (white arrow), and largely fill the somitocoel (black arrow) in the preparation shown. In contrast, the non-myotome is a squamous epithelium that becomes further thinned during late embryonic and larval stages. The border between the ventral myotome and sclerotome (white arrowhead) is located along the gut, near but not abutting the notochord; asterisks in Figure 3B,G mark the nuclei of the two ventral-most sclerotome cells. During larval stages, the position of the sclerotome cells becomes progressively more medial, and then dorsal. In Figures 3 and 4, white arrowheads mark the sclerotome-myotome boundary. In 2 gill slit (GS) larvae, sclerotome cells extend medially to the notochord (Figure 3C,H), and at the 4 GS stage, they extend along the ventral length of the somite and partway up the notochord (Figure 3D,I). Note that because segments become chevron shaped, myosepta separating adjacent segments are apparent in transverse sections at this stage (Figure 3D). In 5 GS larvae, the sclerotome extends to the dorsal edge of the notochord (Figure 4A), and at the 6 GS stage, these cells extended processes (and in some specimens, nuclei) dorsally along the neural tube as well (Figure 4B). At the 9 GS stage, the sclerotome epithelium extends most of the way up the neural tube (Figure 4C, white arrowhead). By early metamorphic stages, and persisting in adults (Figure 5, Figure 6G, and see below), this epithelium derived from sclerotome becomes continuous with that derived from lateral sclerotome, such that a layer of mesothelium derived from non-myotome somites completely surrounds each muscle segment. Together, this suggests movement of the sclerotome medially toward and then dorsally along the midline structures, which would be similar to migration path of (mesenchymal) sclerotome in vertebrates. However, whether this occurs through active migration of sclerotome or the differential growth or migration of the myotome or other surrounding tissues cannot be determined from static images.
Hatschek [14,27] described the sclerotome as a double-layered diverticulum. However, our TEM series showed that from embryonic through mid larval stages, the sclerotome cells always comprise a single layer. Sclerotome cells in early through mid larval stages are shown beside the notochord in Figures 3H,I and 4D (sclerotome nuclei are marked by white asterisks). However, in late larvae and metamorophic animals, a double-layered epithelium is apparent at the notochord level (Figures 4I and 5C). In these images, the two layers are indicated by black arrowheads, sclerotome nuclei are marked by white asterisks, and the enclosed coelom, the sclerocoel, is marked by a black asterisk. However, in some sections, it appears single layered at the notochord level (Figure 4H). Later, in post-metamorphic animals, the sclerotome is invariably double layered and granular extracellular material is observed inside the sclerocoel (Figure 5E,D). We observed adherens junctions between these cells throughout development (for example, Figure 5E, black asterisk), as was previously described in adults , indicating that these sclerotome cells remain epithelial throughout development. Finally, while the sclerotome mesothelium becomes double layered at the notochord level, it apparently remains single layered at the level of the neural tube, at least through the latest stage we examined, the subadult. Sclerotome cells beside the neural tube are shown in Figures 4E,F,G and 5B.
We conclude that the ventral somite, or sclerotome, cells give rise to the mesothelium that encloses the sclerocoel and that separates the myotomes from midline structures, notochord and neural tube. This mesothelium is apposed to the extracellular collagen of the notochordal and perineural sheaths (see below). The morphogenesis of the sclerotome-derived mesothelium is somewhat different than has been previously been proposed (see ‘Discussion’).
B. Development of the external cell layer and somitocoel
In contrast to the progressive change in position of sclerotome cells, non-myotome cells from the lateral part of the somite develop in place from embryonic through adult stages, becoming a thin epithelium that borders the somitocoel. Hereafter, we refer to the lateral somite cells as the external cell layer (Table 1; Figures 3, 4, and 5). Black arrowheads mark the transition between the dorsal myotome and external cell layer in embryonic through mid-larval stages (Figures 3A,B,E,F and 4A,B). In late larvae (Figure 4C), the process of a external cell can be see extending ventrally along the neural tube (black arrowhead); however, cell bodies were not observed to do so. By adult stages, the lateral mesothelium derived from the external cell layer is continuous with the sclerotome-derived mesothelium. Morphologically, the sclerotome and external cell layer-derived populations are indistinguishable, described further below. In adults, the mesothelium derived from the external cell layer forms the lateral boundary of the somitocoel and the muscle forms the medial boundary. Thus, the somitocoel remains in place throughout development (black arrows indicate somitocoel in Figures 3A,B,C,D,F and 4A,B,C). The extracellular collagen of the dermis (described below) forms lateral to the external cell layer.
C. Development of fin box from the dorsal-lateral somite (external cell layer)
Fin boxes are segmental structures that form dorsal to the neural tube (schematized in Figure 1). They consist of a mesothelial lining enclosing a coelom. Extracellular matrix accumulates in the dermis between the dorsal mesothelium and overlying epidermis, increasing the height of fin boxes [15,17]. Our developmental series indicates that the fin box mesothelium originates from the dorsal part of the external layer of the somites (Figure 6). In embryos and early larvae, the dorsal border between the myotome and the non-myotome somite is adjacent to the dorsal neural tube (Figures 3A,B and 6A, black arrowheads). Dorsally, the neural tube directly abuts the epidermis (Figure 6A). At the 4 GS stage, the dorsal-most cells of the external cell layer in each somite pair appear pinched medially toward each other (Figure 6B, black arrowheads). At the 5 GS stage (Figure 6C), a single layer of cells extends dorsally over the neural tube and remains continuous with the external cell layer of both somites. At the 5 to 6 GS stages, the mesoderm overlying the neural tube has become double layered and has lost contact with somites (Figure 6D). While the non-myotome somite cells have considerably thinned by this stage (black arrowhead), mesothelial cells in the fin box remain larger, similar to earlier stages (black arrow). Hemal fluid often accumulates around the fin box. By early metamorphosis, fin box coeloms expand (Figure 6E). Each fin box coelom is enclosed by mesothelial cells on all sides, evident when comparing transverse and sagittal views (Figure 6E,F). In a subadult (Figure 6G,H,I), fin box coeloms are further enlarged, and mesothelial cells are thin and flattened (black arrow), similar to the other somite-derived mesothelia described above. Extracellular material accumulates within the dermis between the dorsal mesothelium of the fin box coelom and the epidermis, and a file of cells extends between them along the dorsal midline (Figure 6G, white arrowhead). Such structures within the dermis have been previously described as cutaneous canals . Their developmental origin is unknown. Granular extracellular material is densest surrounding them, suggesting that they may secrete it (Figure 6H,I).
Development of amphioxus connective tissues
Amphioxus axial connective tissues consist of extracellular collagen layers underlain by basal laminae. Because we wished to characterize the development and fate of the non-myotome somite cells, including a possible role in producing these connective tissues, we next examined connective tissue ontogeny, shown in Figures 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.
The adult dermis is schematized in Figure 1 and was described previously . It consists of extracellular striated collagen beneath the epidermis and separated from it by a basal lamina. A non-striated, gelatinous layer of extracellular matrix is often found between layers of striated collagen. The dermis is bounded on its medial side by somite-derived structures: the external cell layer mesothelium (dorsally) or the perivisceral coelom mesothelium (ventrally).
We traced the origin and development of the dermis (Figures 7, 8, and 9). In mid-gastrulae, the interface between the ectoderm and mesendoderm (where the dermis will form) contains some particulate extracellular matrix (Figure 7A,B, arrow) that continues to accumulate during late gastrula through mid-neurula stages (Figure 7C (arrow),D,E). The material appears along both sides of the interface (slightly pulled apart in the preparations shown), thus it may be produced by cells in both layers. Indeed, coated vesicles filled with ECM and opening to the extracellular space are observed on both sides of the membrane, although it cannot be determined from a static image whether these are exocytotic or endocytotic vesicles (Figure 7D,F, white arrowheads). A basal lamina associated with the ectoderm is first distinguishable in late neurulae (Figure 7F, black arrowhead). During early larval stages, granular extracellular material of the dermis continues to increase in thickness (Figure 8A,B,C,D). Striated collagen fibers are first apparent around the 5 GS stage (Figure 8E, arrowhead), and increase during late larval stages (Figure 8F,G). In mid-late larvae, hemal fluid accumulates medial to the collagen and intermixes with collagen layers. The number of striated collagen layers continues to increase during metamorphic, juvenile and adult stages, reaching an apparent average thickness of about 1.5 μm in a subadult (Figures 8H and 9A,B). In postmetamorphic stages, we observed cells embedded within the dermal collagen (Figure 9B, arrowhead). These cells may be fibroblasts previously described [17,39]; their developmental origin is unknown but discussed further below. The crosshatched structure of dermal collagen fibers is evident in sagittal sections at postmetamorphic stages, and an expanded gelatinous layer is sometimes observed between layers of collagen fibers in subadults (Figure 9C and ). Both the ectoderm and the underlying somite-derived mesothelium remain closely associated with the dermis throughout its development.
B. Notochordal sheath
The notochordal sheath (schematized in Figure 1) consists of three layers of extracellular material [17,40-42]. The outermost layer is composed of longitudinal, striated collagen fibers, the middle layer of circumferential (radial) striated collagen, and the inner layer, also called the elastic interna, is a basal lamina. The notochordal sheath borders the perineural sheath dorsally, the gut tube ventrally and the mesothelia derived from the sclerotome on either side. We find that the sequence and timing of its development is similar to that of the dermis.
The origin and development of the notochordal sheath is shown in Figures 10 and 11. The notochord pinches off from paraxial mesoderm during early neurulation, and immediately after their separation, particulate extracellular matrix is observed between the notochord and somites (Figure 10A,B, arrows). In late neurulae, a basal lamina is present around the notochord (Figure 10C). During early larval stages, extracellular material accumulates between the notochord basal lamina and the adjacent myotome cells. The innermost layer of the notochordal sheath attaches to the notochord via anchors containing hemidesmosome junctions . These anchors are first apparent around the 2 GS stage (Figure 10D, white arrowhead) and become increasingly more developed during the larval period (Figure 10E,F,G,H,I). The proposal that such anchors are cilia-related structures  is incorrect. Between the 4 and 5 GS stages, striated, circumferential collagen fibers first become apparent within the sheath (Figure 10F, black arrowhead). The outer layer of longitudinal fibers is thinner and develops later; we first observed it during metamorphosis (Figures 10J, arrow, and 12A,B,C,D). The outer fibers of the sheath (both longitudinal and circumferential) often become intermixed with hemal fluid. Layers of striated collagen continue to be added during the metamorphic and juvenile stages (Figure 11A,B,C,E) and reach a thickness of approximately 1.5 μm (similar to the dermis) in a subadult (Figure 11D). A previous study reported that the adult notochordal sheath can reach a thickness of at least 20 μm , indicating that growth continues in adulthood. At the dorsal midline, the notochordal sheath merges with the perineural sheath and the outer, longitudinal collagen layers are thicker than elsewhere (Figure 11F (arrowhead),G,H,I,J). At this position, the sheath is bounded dorsally by the floor plate and ventrally by specialized notochord cells called Müller cells (Figure 11F). The number of layers of these longitudinal collagen fibers increase during metamorphosis and juvenile stages and reached a thickness of about 2 μm in a subadult (Figure 11J).
C. Perineural sheath
The perineural sheath (schematized in Figure 1) consists of circumferentially oriented collagen fibers underlain by a basal lamina. It borders the sclerotome-derived mesothelium on either side and merges with the notochordal sheath ventrally. Dorsally, it is adjacent to the epidermis, fin box, and finally the external cell layer-derived mesothelium at different stages of development. It is thinner than the notochordal sheath and dermis, and its development is delayed relative to these structures.
Perineural sheath development is shown in Figure 12. During its formation, the neural tube is flanked by the paraxial mesoderm and borders the axial mesoderm ventrally. The early stages of perineural sheath formation are identical to that of the notochordal sheath and dermis. Particulate extracellular material accumulates on both sides of the interface between the neural tube and somites by the late neurula stage (Figure 12A,B), and a basal lamina appears around the neural tube in early larvae (Figure 12C). The perineural sheath grows during larval stages through addition of particulate extracellular matrix. Unlike in the dermis and notochordal sheath, striated collagen fibers are not present in the perineural sheath at the 5 GS stage (Figure 12D); rather, they first appear in late larvae, around the 9 GS stage (Figure 12E). The perineural sheath increases in thickness during metamorphic (Figure 12F) and juvenile stages and is about 0.75 μm in a subadult (Figure 12G), or about half the thickness of the dermis and notochordal sheaths.
The myosepta are composed of collagenous extracellular material and form between the anterior and posterior borders of adjacent segments (schematized in Figure 1). The myosepta connect laterally to the dermis and medially to the notochordal sheath and transmit force from contracting muscles to the notochord. In contrast to vertebrates, amphioxus axial muscles never connect directly to the notochordal sheath or other midline structures; their only tendinous connection is to myosepta .
Myoseptal development is shown in Figures 13 and 14. In mid-neurulae, myosepta consist of a layer of extracellular matrix at the interface between adjacent myotomes (Figure 13A), and in late neurulae develop into double basal laminae facing both myotomes (Figure 3B). The myosepta increase in thickness during larval and metamorphic stages through addition of particular extracellular material, although striated collagen fibers are not observed (Figure 13C,D,E,F). In subadults, the myosepta reach a variable thickness of 0.5 to 1 μm (Figure 13G,H). Figure 13D shows a complete myoseptum at the 5 GS stage, including its attachments to the notochordal sheath and dermis (left and right arrowheads, respectively). An attachment to the (now striated) dermis is also shown for a postmetamorphic juvenile (Figure 13G, black arrowhead). The myosepta attach to muscle cells through subcellular structures termed microtendons , which are evident by early larval stages (Figure 13C, white arrowhead) and continue to develop in larvae and juveniles. In transverse sections (Figure 14C,D,E,G), the microtendons are largely perpendicular to the section plane, so their connections to the myosepta are mostly not visible; in sagittal sections (Figure 13F,H), these connections are more easily visualized. Myofibers become excluded from the microtendon forming regions of muscle cells in postmetamorphic stages, evident in sagittal section (Figure 13F).
The myosepta develop between muscle cells of adjacent segments and are therefore likely produced by muscles themselves. However, in adult animals, we observed non-muscle cells beside the myosepta as well (Figure 13H, asterisk marks a nucleus). To further characterize these myoseptal cells, we examined multiple stages. They are not present in embryos or early larvae and are rare in late larvae. For example, a sagittal section through a metamorphic stage myoseptum reveals no non-muscle cells (Figure 14A). When these cells are observed in late larvae and metamorphic animals (Figure 14B,C, nuclei marked by asterisks), they are usually but not always near the ends of the myosepta and in contact with either the sclerotome or external cell layer-derived mesothelium. In contrast, in adults, non-muscle cells are found along the length of myosepta (Figure 14D, E). The possibility that these cells are somite-derived is considered below.
Connective tissue fate of non-myotome somite cells
All of the non-myotome somite derivatives described above develop adjacent to extracellular connective tissues. We therefore wished to ask whether they show features of secretory cells that would suggest they contribute to these connective tissues.
For this analysis, we first referred back to high magnification views of individual cells in the TEM series (Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14). Morphologically, all non-myotome somite cells and their mesothelial derivatives in the fin box, external cell layer and sclerotome (and perivisceral coelom, not shown), are indistinguishable at the stages we examined, although some ultrastructural differences have been noted in adults, notably in the presence of cilia . In embryos and early larvae, non-myotome somite cells form a circumferentially oriented epithelium continuous with myotome (Figure 3E,F,G,H,I, asterisks mark nuclei). During larval stages, these cells remain epithelial and become elongated and extremely thin; their thickest point is often their nuclei (Figures 4C and 5A show overviews, and higher power views are shown in Figures 8A,B, 9A,B, 4D,E,F,G,H,I, and 5B,C,D, nuclei marked with white asterisks). Adherens junctions are observed between them (for example, Figures 5E and 8D, black asterisks), indicating that they remain epithelial. These cells are uniformly rich in rough endoplasmic reticulum from larval through adult stages, in agreement with previous findings in adults , and suggesting that they are specialized for protein secretion (one example of rough ER is indicated by the striped arrowhead in Figure 8A, but see also Figures 3, 4, 5, 8, and 9, especially Figures 3I, 4F,G,H,I, 5B,C,D, 8A,B, and 9B). Further, we observed vesicles, including clathrin-coated vesicles, opening between these cells and extracellular collagen layers (for example, Figures 7D, 8D, and 9A, white arrowheads). However, based on static images, it cannot be determined whether these vesicles are exocytotic or endocytotic, and it is also is important to note that vesicles were also observed in the ectodermal epithelium, neurons, and notochord (for example, Figures 7F and 8A, white arrowheads).
We also examined the expression of collagen A in our developmental series (Figures 15 and 16). This is the single clade A collagen gene in amphioxus. Clade A family members in vertebrates (including collagens 1, 3, 5, and 2) form the predominant fibrillar components of connective and skeletal tissues including dermis, tendon, ligament, cartilage, and bone . The ColA gene was previously shown to be expressed in somites, notochord, and neural tube of amphioxus embryos, [36,46].
In adults, we find that ColA is strongly expressed in all of the somite-derived mesothelia described above, including the external cell layer and sclerotome mesothelia, and the mesothelia of the fin box and perivisceral coelom (Figure 15B,D,E,F,G). It is also strongly expressed in the non-muscle cells that become abundant in the myosepta in adults (Figure 15H). Finally, ColA is expressed in the neural tube and the Müller cells, which are located on the dorsal and ventral periphery of the notochord (Figure 15B). Adjacent sections were stained with a muscle myosin light chain probe (MLC), which labels the myotome and also the notochord lamellae, which are contractile in amphioxus, unlike in vertebrates [17,41]. Unlike the non-myotome somite derivatives, ColA mRNA was never detected in myotome cells (Figures 15 and 16).
We next observed ColA expression in our developmental series, and we found that it is expressed in the non-myotome somite and its derivatives throughout development. In embryos, ColA is expressed in all, or nearly all, cells of the non-myotome somite epithelium (Figure 16A,B, white arrowheads indicate the external cell layer, black arrowheads indicate sclerotome). Double in situ hybridization with MLC shows no overlap between the two markers in somites (Figure 16B). Consistent with prior reports, the embryonic notochord and neural tube express ColA as well [36,46]. However, expression by these midline structures is labile, and during early larval stages, both tissues extinguish ColA expression (Figure 16D,G,I), which then resumes later in the neural tube and in a the notochord Müller cells (Figure 15B, described above).
Strikingly, in larvae, ColA expression continues strongly in all derivatives of the non-myotome somites. Tracking the position of ColA positive cells reveals they are present in all the same positions where we observed sclerotome-derived mesothelium (Figure 16D,E,F,G,H,I,J). Frontal (horizontal) sections show no variation in the position of sclerotome-derived mesothelial cells along the AP axis of each segment (Figure 16G, and not shown), although at most time points we focused on transverse sections. In addition to expression in sclerotome derivatives, ColA expression is observed in the mesothelium derived from the external cell layer (Figure 16A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J, white arrowheads indicate selected nuclei) and in their derivatives including the lateral mesothelium and the fin box mesothelium (Figure 16D,F (black arrows),J). Finally, the non-muscle cells that populate the myosepta also strongly express ColA. As described above, these cells are first apparent in late larval stages, where they are most often found at the ends of myosepta and appear connected to the external cell layer or sclerotome mesothelium (Figure 16H,I,J, black and white arrows mark the medial and lateral ends of myosepta, respectively). However, occasionally ColA positive cells also appear near the center of a myoseptum (Figure 16I). In adults, as described above, these cells are abundant along each myoseptum (Figure 15D), and these strongly express ColA (Figure 15B,H). Together, the ultrastructure and ColA expression of all non-myotome somite derivatives throughout development suggests that they contribute to formation of extracellular collagen connective tissues to which they are directly apposed.
The development and derivatives of amphioxus non-myotome somite cells
Our developmental series indicates that the non-myotome cells of amphioxus somites give rise to the mesothelia surrounding the muscle blocks, the mesothelial linings of the fin box and perivisceral coeloms, and likely to the fibroblast-like mesenchymal cells that are abundant along the myosepta between segments. Our series shows cell positions and apparent movements over time and is schematized in Figure 17.
The lateral part of the somite, the external cell layer, differentiates in place, as was previously reported, giving rise to the mesothelium that underlies the dermis. In contrast, the ventral somite, the sclerotome, undergoes considerable changes in cell position over time. It is important to note that we cannot determine that sclerotome cells are actively migrating, only that a relative change in position occurs, which could be due to migration and/or differential growth of sclerotome or the surrounding tissues. Previous conflicting models have proposed that the amphioxus sclerotome originates (1) from a diverticulum of ventral somite cells that move dorsally to surround the midline structures  or (2) from a population of dorsal somite cells that migrate ventrally along the midline . Our developmental series indicates sclerotome cells originate from the ventral somite and move first medially toward the midline during late embryonic stages (Figure 17A). Simultaneously, the ventral-lateral somite pinches ventrally to give rise to the perivisceral coelom. During early-mid larval stages, the sclerotome is a single-layered mesothelium that moves progressively more dorsally along the midline structures and ultimately joins with the external cell layer at the level of the dorsal neural tube, to form a continuous mesothelium (Figure 17B,C,D,E). In contrast to Hatschek’s model, however, sclerotome cells are a single epithelial layer. It is only at the late larval stage that the mesothelium becomes double layered at the level of the notochord (Figure 17E), and it apparently remains single layered beside the neural tube at least until the subadult stage (the latest stage we examined). A previous report found a double layer in older adults . It is not clear how this double layer forms since we did not observe any intermediate stages. It could form by delamination of the single-layered sclerotome. Alternatively, it is it is possible that after the sclerotome migrates it evaginates medially and pinches off to form a sclerocoel; if so, then the sclerocoel would be derived from the original somitocoel.
The fin box mesothelium also originates from the non-myotome somite, specifically from the dorsal-most region of the external cell layer. These cells move medially, to form a mesothelium overlying the neural tube (Figure 17A,B). As with the sclerotome, it appears single layered initially and connected to the somites on either side of it. Subsequently, these cells apparently detach from the somites and form a double layer (Figure 17C), which encloses the coelom of the fin box. As with the sclerocoel, we did not observe intermediate stages, so it is not clear how a double layer arises; two possibilities include delamination of the single layer or dorsal evagination of a single cell layer that then pinches off from the somites.
Cells associated with the myosepta have not been previously described in amphioxus to our knowledge. These fibroblast-like cells appear late in larval stages (not shown in Figure 17 schematic) but only become abundant in adults, where they are found along the length of both sides of each myoseptum (Figure 17F). These cells may also be derived from non-myotome somites, because they first appear (during mid-larval stages) close to and usually connected to the mesothelia derived from sclerotome or external cell layer. In adults, they appear to be mesenchymal, and they express ColA, but not a muscle marker (MLC), like the other non-myotome somite derivatives. Notably, similar myoseptal cells are found in vertebrates including teleosts (discussed below), where they are known to originate in sclerotome. Finally, in amphioxus, similar cells resembling fibroblasts have been observed embedded in dermal collagen layers ([17,22,39] and see Figure 9B). It is possible that these dermal fibroblasts also have a somitic origin in amphioxus, perhaps arising from the external cell layer-derived mesothelium.
A limitation to note is that we focused mainly on transverse section planes and thus could have missed variation, particularly across the A-P extent of the segments. To account for this, we observed multiple sections and specimens, and we prepared some specimens (but not at all stages) in frontal or sagittal planes (some of which are shown above).
A connective tissue identity for non-myotome somite cells
Our observations suggest that the non-myotome cells of amphioxus somites comprise a population of connective tissue progenitors. They express ColA throughout development and develop directly apposed to the extracellular, collagenous axial connective tissues of amphioxus: the notochordal and perineural sheaths and the dermis. The ultrastructure of these cells, most notably their abundance of rough endoplasmic reticulum, further supports the idea that they are specialized for protein secretion. Finally, differences have been described in the extracellular matrix within the somitocoel and sclerocoel and in the morphology of the lateral and medial mesothelial in adults (presence vs. absence of cilia; ), indicating that these mesothelia are sub-functionalized to some extent. However, in most respects, these mesothelia are indistinguishable in morphology and ultrastructure.
The amphioxus axial connective tissues are likely produced by multiple cell types, and relative contributions may vary at different developmental stages. The notochordal and perineural sheaths must be secreted at least in part by the notochord and neural tube cells themselves, because these are the only collagen-expressing adjacent tissues during their early development ([36,46,47] and see Figure 16). Both, however, express it dynamically, and it is the somite-derived mesothelial cells that are the predominant ColA expressing cells from mid-larval stages onward, and persisting in adults. We therefore hypothesize that a key function of these somite-derived mesothelia is to expand and maintain the connective tissues that the midline structures first generate. One notable exception is the notochord Müller cells, which do strongly express ColA in adults. The Müller cells are distinct from the main notochord lamellae, and their functions are not understood [17,41]. They express ColA in precisely the same positions where the notochordal sheath is not contacted by somite-derived mesothelium. Thus, in adults, the notochordal sheath is continuously bounded by ColA expressing cells but from two different sources (Figure 15B). A regional thickening at the ventral side correlates to where it is bounded by both the Müller cells and the sclerocoel, and the dorsal sheath thickens where it contacts the dorsal Müller cells and the neural tube. In contrast, ColA was never detected in epidermis, suggesting that the dermis is primarily a product of somite-derived cells. Similarly, myosepta must first be generated by the muscle cells themselves, because for most of development only the muscle cells are in contact with them. However, the non-muscle cells lining the myosepta in adults strongly express ColA (which muscle cells do not) and therefore likely function to strengthen and maintain the myosepta.
ColA is the sole clade A collagen in the amphioxus genome, and it is broadly expressed, including in the notochord and gill bars, two sites where cellular cartilage has been proposed to have originally evolved [36,46,47]. In vertebrates, collagen gene duplications are thought to be key events underlying the elaboration of connective tissues and origin of a mineralized skeleton. The clade A collagens are the most abundantly expressed type and include types I, II, III, and Va2. Collagen II expression is a hallmark of cartilage as well as notochord [48,49]. Dermis, tendons and ligaments are composed primarily of collagen type I, with lesser amounts of types III and V. Mineralized bone contains collagens I and V [45,50,51]. We find that amphioxus clade A collagen is expressed in all non-myotome somites and their derivatives throughout development and thus may have been similarly expressed in the last common ancestor with vertebrates. The diverse expression patterns of clade A collagen duplicates in vertebrate somitic compartments and their derivatives may represent sub-functionalization of an ancestral ColA expression pattern, de novo recruitment to vertebrate somitic compartments, or some combination of both. Other key changes, including regulation of collagen II by SoxE/Sox9 cassette (which occurred in stem vertebrates, and is common to agnathans and gnathostomes), have been described elsewhere [36,46,47] and recently .
Potential homologies of vertebrate and invertebrate somitic compartments, and implications for the evolutionary origin of sclerotome
Figure 18 compares the organization and development of somites in amphioxus and vertebrates. In vertebrates, sclerotome arises on the ventral side of newly formed somites (Figure 18B,C). Despite differences across higher vertebrates (anamniotes vs. amniotes) in sclerotome position (proximity to the notochord), size, and induction mechanisms, there are many additional shared features. For example, vertebrate sclerotome is characterized by its ability to undergo EMT, its migration around midline structures and contribution to skeletal and connective tissue of the vertebrae and ribs (Figure 18B,C). It is also characterized by expression of Pax-1/9 and Twist-1, and by containing cell populations expressing markers for cartilage (Sox-9) and for tendon and ligament (Scx) (reviewed in [1,2,4,53] and see [5,6]).
Since the skeleton is a vertebrate novelty, the sclerotome compartment may also have arisen in somites of early vertebrates. Alternatively, a sclerotome-like compartment may have pre-dated vertebrates but gained the ability to form skeletal tissue. Our observations of amphioxus non-myotome somite development reveal striking similarities with vertebrates, suggesting that most aspects of the sclerotome developmental program were in place before vertebrates evolved.
A comparison to teleost vertebral column development highlights the similarities in amphioxus. In teleosts (mainly studied in zebrafish, medaka, salmon, and trout) as in all vertebrates, the earliest axial support to develop is the notochord and its sheath. The notochordal sheath first appears as a basal lamina surrounding notochord cells, followed by a layer composed primarily of striated collagen II fibers and produced by the notochord itself [54-56]. After its formation, the collagenous layer of the sheath segmentally mineralizes to give rise to the chordacentra (unlike in amphioxus). Also unlike amphioxus, an outer elastin-rich layer, elastica externa, forms around the collagen layer. Teleost chordacentra are acellular and thus form differently from endochondral or dermal bone, and their formation is apparently independent of somite segmentation . Subsequently, sclerotome-derived cells expressing collagen I migrate around the notochord and neural tube and give rise to the cellular skeletal tissue of the pericentrum and neural arches, respectively, which together comprise the vertebrae ( and references therein). The mode and timing of vertebral ossification varies by species and even AP region of the axial skeleton, and in some teleosts and more basal vertebrates (elasmobranchs), somite-derived cells also invade through the elastica externa and strengthen the chordacentrum, while in others, as in tetrapods, they remain outside the notochordal sheath [56-58]. Finally, it was recently shown that teleost myosepta initially form as acellular connective tissue between the myomeres and that they cellularize only late in development, via migration of mesenchymal cells from the sclerotome . These myoseptal cells express collagen I (like the rest of the sclerotome and dermatome in teleosts), but they also express tendon markers including Scx and collagen Va2 [5,6].
Although less well studied, these processes appear conserved within the most basal vertebrates, agnathans, including formation of the notochordal sheath as well as the position and movement of sclerotome cells around midline structures, and expression of sclerotome (Pax1/9, Twist) and cartilage (Sox9) markers. Lamprey sclerotome also expresses parascleraxis (which duplicated in gnathostomes to paraxis and scleraxis), suggesting that it may also contain connective tissue progenitors [58-61]. This conservation of general sclerotome features from agnathans to teleosts (and in also in tetrapods, reviewed in ) suggests they are likely ancestral to vertebrates, despite many derived aspects of teleost development.
In amphioxus, as in fish, we find that the notochordal sheath first forms as a basal lamina, after which external layers of striated collagen arise, most likely derived from notochord. Later in amphioxus development, mesothelia derived from the sclerotome migrate around the midline structures and strongly express ColA; as we propose above, these may contribute to strengthening the axial extracellular connective tissue, similar to teleosts. Finally, the late appearance of collagen-expressing cells within amphioxus myosepta is also found in teleosts. These myoseptal cells’ earliest appearance near the medial and lateral ends of the myosepta, and early continuity with those somite-derived mesothelia, suggests a somitic origin.
Taken together, the position, migration path, likely fate as a connective tissue population that reinforces midline connective tissue, and potential contribution to the myosepta, are all features likely shared by the amphioxus ventral somite region and vertebrate sclerotome. We thus argue that these two structures are homologous, as Hatschek originally proposed. Furthermore, while detailed examination of expression domain and timing has yet to be performed, the amphioxus homolog of fish and tetrapod sclerotome marker, twist, is expressed in non-myotome somites, and pax1/9 is expressed in somites as well [36,62].
These findings lead to a model for ancestral, invertebrate sclerotome that, like in amphioxus, arose in the ventral somite and contained connective tissue progenitors whose derivatives formed or reinforced the connective tissue support required for myomere-based movement. During the transition to vertebrates, this compartment would have evolved the ability to give rise to cartilage progenitors, while continuing to produce axial connective tissue as well. The first evolved vertebral elements were the neural and hemal arches, found in agnathans. In ancestral gnathostomes, sclerotome evolved to contribute to vertebral centra and ribs as well. While further modifications to sclerotome morphology and position can be seen during the course of vertebrate evolution, particularly in the transition to tetrapods, this dual fate, axial skeleton and axial connective tissue/tendon, is maintained.
Consistent with the idea of a cartilage progenitor fate evolving within a somitic connective tissue compartment, molecular genetic observations show that within the sclerotome of chick and mouse, axial tendon (Scx positive) and neural arch/rib cartilage (Sox-9 positive) progenitors are co-mingled and overlap to some extent. Genetic lineage mapping reveals that descendants of Scx expressing cells contribute extensively to the neural arches and distal ribs and that tenocytes and chondrocytes near the intersection of tendon and cartilage share a common history of expressing both genes [63,64]. Further, axial tendon and neural arch/ rib cartilage fates are interconvertable when genetically manipulated, suggesting that antagonistic inductive mechanisms function to create distinct lineages from a common pool of cells [38,65]. In contrast, progenitors of axial tendon and centra cartilage do not appear to be interconvertable in the same way, and cells with a Scx expression history rarely contribute to centra, perhaps reflecting the different developmental and evolutionary histories of the neural arches/ribs and centra in tetrapods [64,65]. The mechanisms through which tendon and cartilage progenitor fates separate are not fully worked out, but it is known that both somitic tendon progenitors and neural arch/rib cartilage progenitors are induced by myotomally expressed Fgfs in amniotes and that somitic tendons also require Fgf signaling in teleosts [6,38,66,67].
Here, we used a frequently sampled developmental series to characterize amphioxus somite and connective tissue development. We provide a revised model for amphioxus somite morphogenesis. Further, we propose that amphioxus non-myotome somite cells have a connective tissue identity and that their derivatives serve to strengthen the axial connective tissues which, in addition to the notochord, support myomere-based movement. Based on position, apparent migration path, and connective tissue identity, we propose that amphioxus non-myotome somites contain a cell population homologous to vertebrate sclerotome and that both evolved from an ancestral sclerotome containing connective tissue progenitors. It will be interesting to uncover the genetic changes necessary to derive a cartilage-producing cell population within a connective tissue somitic compartment.
external cell layer
fin box coelom
early metamorphosis stage larva
transmission electron microscopy
Christ B, Huang R, Scaal M. Amniote somite derivatives. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:2382–96.
Brent AE, Tabin CJ. Developmental regulation of somite derivatives: muscle, cartilage and tendon. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:548–57.
Scaal M, Wiegreffe C. Somite compartments in anamniotes. Anat Embryol. 2006;211 Suppl 1:9–19.
Stickney HL, Barresi MJ, Devoto SH. Somite development in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2000;219:287–303.
Bricard Y, Ralliere C, Lebret V, Lefevre F, Rescan PY. Early fish myoseptal cells: insights from the trout and relationships with amniote axial tenocytes. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91876.
Chen JW, Galloway JL. The development of zebrafish tendon and ligament progenitors. Development. 2014;141:2035–45.
Liem KF, Bemis WE, Walker Jr WF, Grande L. Functional anatomy of the vertebrates: an evolutionary perspective. 3rd ed. Orlando: Harcourt; 2001.
Delsuc F, Tsagkogeorga G, Lartillot N, Philippe H. Additional molecular support for the new chordate phylogeny. Genesis. 2008;46:592–604.
Putnam NH, Butts T, Ferrier DE, Furlong RF, Hellsten U, Kawashima T, et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature. 2008;453:1064–71.
Ruppert EE. Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies? Can J Zool. 2005;83:8–23.
Conklin EG. The embryology of amphioxus. J Morphol. 1932;54:69–151.
Willey A. Amphioxus and the ancestry of the vertebrates. New York: Macmillan and Co.; 1894.
Franz V. Beiträge zur näheren Ergündung des Verhältnisses zwischen Lanzettfisch und Wirbeltier. Biologisches Centralblatt. 1926;41:24–38.
Hatschek B. Uber den Schichtenbau von Amphioxus. Anat Anz. 1888;3:662–7.
Holland N, Holland L. Fine structure of the mesothelia and extracellular materials in the coelomic fluid of the fin boxes, myocoels and sclerocoels of a lancelet, Branchiostoma floridae (Cephalochordata = Acrania). Acta Zoologica. 1990;71:225–34.
Olsson R. The skin of amphioxus. Zeitscrhift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie. 1961;54:90–104.
Ruppert EE. Cephalochordata (Acrania). In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE, editors. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, Volume 15, Hemichordata, Chaetognatha, and the Invertebrate Chordates, vol. 15. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1997. p. 349–504.
Sunier ALJ. Les premiers stades de la differentiation interne du myotome et la formation des elements sclérotomatiques chez les acraniens, les sélaciens et les téléostéens. Onderzoekingen verricht in het Zoologisch Laboratorium der Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 1911;2:1–109 + pl. I-VI.
Goldschmidt RB. Die Bindgewebe des Amphioxus. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft fur Morphologie und Physiologie in München. 1908;24:53–78.
Joseph H. Beiträge zur Histologie des Amphioxus. Arbeiten aus der zoologischen Instituten der Universität Wien. 1900;12:99–132 + pl. I.
Rähr H. The ultrastructure of the blood vessel of Branchiostoma lanceolatum (Pallas) (Cephalochordata) I. Relations between blood vessels, epithelia, basal laminae, and “connective tissue”. Zoomorphology. 1981;97:53–74.
Welsch U. Beobachtungen über die Feinstruktur der Haut und des äussern Branchialepithels von Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anataomie. 1968;88:565–75.
Tenbaum E. Polarisationsoptische Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gewebe von Branchiotsoma lanceolatum. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anataomi. 1955;42:149–92.
Beaster-Jones L, Kaltenbach SL, Koop D, Yuan S, Chastain R, Holland LZ. Expression of somite segmentation genes in amphioxus: a clock without a wavefront? Dev Genes Evol. 2008;218:599–611.
Schubert M, Holland LZ, Stokes MD, Holland ND. Three amphioxus Wnt genes (AmphiWnt3, AmphiWnt5, and AmphiWnt6) associated with the tail bud: the evolution of somitogenesis in chordates. Dev Biol. 2001;240:262–73.
Kowalevsky A. Weitere studien über die Entwidkelungsgeschichte des Amphioxus lanceolatus, nebst einem Beitrage zur Homologie des Nervensystems der Würmer und Wierbelthiere. Archives für mikroskopische Anatomie. 1877;13:181–204 + pl XV-XVI.
Hatschek B. Studien über Entwicklung des Amphioxus. Arbeiten aus den zoologischen Institute der Universität Wien und der zoologischen Station in Triest. 1881;4:1–88 + pl. I-IX.
Hirakow R, Kajita N. Electron microscopic study of the development of amphioxus, Branchiostoma belcheri tsingtausense: the neurul and larva. Acta Anatomica Nipponica. 1994;69:1–13.
Holland LZ, Pace DA, Blink ML, Kene M, Holland ND. Sequence and expression of amphioxus alkali myosin light chain (AmphiMLC-alk) throughout development: implications for vertebrate myogenesis. Dev Biol. 1995;171:665–76.
Kozmik Z, Holland LZ, Schubert M, Lacalli TC, Kreslova J, Vlcek C, et al. Characterization of Amphioxus AmphiVent, an evolutionarily conserved marker for chordate ventral mesoderm. Genesis. 2001;29:172–9.
Drach P. Embranchement des Céphalochordés. In: Grassé PP, editor. Traité de Zoologie, Tome XI, Échinodermes, Stomochordés, Protochordés. Paris: Masson; 1948. p. 931–1037.
Christ B, Huang R, Scaal M. Formation and differentiation of the avian sclerotome. Anat Embryol. 2004;208:333–50.
Scaal M, Christ B. Formation and differentiation of the avian dermomyotome. Anat Embryol. 2004;208:411–24.
Wada H. Origin and genetic evolution of the vertebrate skeleton. Zoolog Sci. 2010;27:119–23.
Holland LZ, Yu JK. Cephalochordate (amphioxus) embryos: procurement, culture, and basic methods. Methods Cell Biol. 2004;74:195–215.
Meulemans D, Bronner-Fraser M. Insights from amphioxus into the evolution of vertebrate cartilage. PLoS One. 2007;2:e787.
McGlinn E, Mansfield JH. Detection of gene expression in mouse embryos and tissue sections. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;770:259–92.
Brent AE, Schweitzer R, Tabin CJ. A somitic compartment of tendon progenitors. Cell. 2003;113:235–48.
Statch T. Microscopic anatomy of developmental stages of branchiostoma lanceolatum (cephalochordata, chordata). Bonner Zoologische Monographien. 2000;47:1–116.
Bocina I, Saraga-Babic M. Immunohistochemical study of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix components in the notochord and notochordal sheath of amphioxus. Int J Biol Sci. 2006;2:73–8.
Flood P. Fine structure of the notochord of amphioxus. Symposia Zool Soc Lond. 1975;36:81–104.
Welsch U. [On the ultrastructure of the chorda dorsalis of Branchiostoma lanceolatum]. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie. 1968;87:69–81.
Bocina I, Ljubesic N, Saraga-Babic M. Cilia-like structures anchor the amphioxus notochord to its sheath. Acta Histochem. 2011;113:49–52.
Gemballa S, Vogel F. Spatial arrangement of white muscle fibers and myoseptal tendons in fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002;133:1013–37.
Cole WG. Collagen genes: mutations affecting collagen structure and expression. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1994;47:29–80.
Wada H, Okuyama M, Satoh N, Zhang S. Molecular evolution of fibrillar collagen in chordates, with implications for the evolution of vertebrate skeletons and chordate phylogeny. Evol Dev. 2006;8:370–7.
Zhang G, Cohn MJ. Hagfish and lancelet fibrillar collagens reveal that type II collagen-based cartilage evolved in stem vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16829–33.
Cole AG. A review of diversity in the evolution and development of cartilage: the search for the origin of the chondrocyte. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;21:122–9.
Exposito JY, Valcourt U, Cluzel C, Lethias C. The fibrillar collagen family. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11:407–26.
Boot-Handford RP, Tuckwell DS. Fibrillar collagen: the key to vertebrate evolution? A tale of molecular incest. Bioessays. 2003;25:142–51.
Ricard-Blum S, Ruggiero F. The collagen superfamily: from the extracellular matrix to the cell membrane. Pathol Biol. 2005;53:430–42.
Jandzik D, Garnett AT, Square TA, Cattell MV, Yu JK, Medeiros DM. Evolution of the new vertebrate head by co-option of an ancient chordate skeletal tissue. Nature. 2014;518:534–37.
Zhang G. An evo-devo view on the origin of the backbone: evolutionary development of the vertebrae. Integr Comp Biol. 2009;49:178–86.
Fleming A, Keynes R, Tannahill D. A central role for the notochord in vertebral patterning. Development. 2004;131:873–80.
Grotmol S, Kryvi H, Keynes R, Krossoy C, Nordvik K, Totland GK. Stepwise enforcement of the notochord and its intersection with the myoseptum: an evolutionary path leading to development of the vertebra? J Anat. 2006;209:339–57.
Grotmol S, Kryvi H, Nordvik K, Totland GK. Notochord segmentation may lay down the pathway for the development of the vertebral bodies in the Atlantic salmon. Anat Embryol. 2003;207:263–72.
Bensimon-Brito A, Cardeira J, Cancela ML, Huysseune A, Witten PE. Distinct patterns of notochord mineralization in zebrafish coincide with the localization of Osteocalcin isoform 1 during early vertebral centra formation. BMC Dev Biol. 2012;12:28.
Goodrich ES. Studies on the structure and development of Vertebrates. London: Macmillan; 1930.
Freitas R, Zhang G, Cohn MJ. Evidence that mechanisms of fin development evolved in the midline of early vertebrates. Nature. 2006;442:1033–7.
Ota KG, Fujimoto S, Oisi Y, Kuratani S. Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish. Nat Commun. 2011;2:373.
Zhang G, Miyamoto MM, Cohn MJ. Lamprey type II collagen and Sox9 reveal an ancient origin of the vertebrate collagenous skeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:3180–5.
Kozmik Z, Holland ND, Kreslova J, Oliveri D, Schubert M, Jonasova K, et al. Pax-Six-Eya-Dach network during amphioxus development: conservation in vitro but context specificity in vivo. Dev Biol. 2007;306:143–59.
Sugimoto Y, Takimoto A, Akiyama H, Kist R, Scherer G, Nakamura T, et al. Scx+/Sox9+ progenitors contribute to the establishment of the junction between cartilage and tendon/ligament. Development. 2013;140:2280–8.
Sugimoto Y, Takimoto A, Hiraki Y, Shukunami C. Generation and characterization of ScxCre transgenic mice. Genesis. 2013;51:275–83.
Brent AE, Braun T, Tabin CJ. Genetic analysis of interactions between the somitic muscle, cartilage and tendon cell lineages during mouse development. Development. 2005;132:515–28.
Brent AE, Tabin CJ. FGF acts directly on the somitic tendon progenitors through the Ets transcription factors Pea3 and Erm to regulate scleraxis expression. Development. 2004;131:3885–96.
Huang R, Stolte D, Kurz H, Ehehalt F, Cann GM, Stockdale FE, et al. Ventral axial organs regulate expression of myotomal Fgf-8 that influences rib development. Dev Biol. 2003;255:30–47.
Flood PR. Structure of the segmental trunk muscle in amphioxus. With notes on the course and "endings" of the so-called ventral root fibres. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;84:389–416.
Kellincott WW. Outlines of chordate development. New York: Henry Holt; 1913.
Devoto SH, Stoiber W, Hammond CL, Steinbacher P, Haslett JR, Barresi MJ, et al. Generality of vertebrate developmental patterns: evidence for a dermomyotome in fish. Evol Dev. 2006;8:101–10.
Waterman RE. Development of the lateral musculature in the teleost, Branchydanio rerio: a fine structural study. Am J Anat. 1969;125:457–94.
Yadov M. Amphibian development. New Delhi: New Discovery Publishing; 2008.
Le Guellec D, Morvan-Dubois G, Sire JY. Skin development in bony fish with particular emphasis on collagen deposition in the dermis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:217–31.
Onimaru K, Shoguchi E, Kuratani S, Tanaka M. Development and evolution of the lateral plate mesoderm: comparative analysis of amphioxus and lamprey with implications for the acquisition of paired fins. Dev Biol. 2011;359:124–36.
Brill G, Kahane N, Carmeli C, von Schack D, Barde YA, Kalcheim C. Epithelial-mesenchymal conversion of dermatome progenitors requires neural tube-derived signals: characterization of the role of Neurotrophin-3. Development. 1995;121:2583–94.
We are grateful to Linda Holland and Daniel Medieros for discussions, in situ probes, and collaboration on amphioxus embryo collection. We also thank Aaron Garnett, Edwina McGlinn, Alysha Heimberg, and Pablo Perez for collaborating on amphioxus collection. We thank Malcolm Wood, Scripps Research Institute Microscopy Core, for additional electron microscopy. This work was supported by a Presidential Research Award from Barnard College.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JHM, NDH, and AEB designed the study and wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to revisions. JHM and NDH collected and fixed specimens; EH prepared specimens for TEM and performed TEM. EH, NDH, and JHM interpreted the TEM data. JHM and AEB performed mRNA in situ hybridization and light microcopy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.