Skip to main content

Adenylate cyclase A amplification and functional diversification during Polyspondylium pallidum development

Abstract

Background

In Dictyostelium discoideum (Ddis), adenylate cyclase A (ACA) critically generates the cAMP oscillations that coordinate aggregation and morphogenesis. Unlike group 4 species like Ddis, other groups do not use extracellular cAMP to aggregate. However, deletion of cAMP receptors (cARs) or extracellular phosphodiesterase (PdsA) in Polyspondylium pallidum (Ppal, group 2) blocks fruiting body formation, suggesting that cAMP oscillations ancestrally control post-aggregative morphogenesis. In group 2, the acaA gene underwent several duplications. We deleted the three Ppal aca genes to identify roles for either gene and tested whether Ppal shows transient cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation, which underpins oscillatory cAMP signalling.

Results

In contrast to Ddis, pre-aggregative Ppal cells did not produce a pulse of cAMP upon stimulation with the cAR agonist 2′H-cAMP, but acquired this ability after aggregation. Deletion of Ppal aca1, aca2 and aca3 yielded different phenotypes. aca1ˉ cells showed relatively thin stalks, aca2ˉ showed delayed secondary sorogen formation and aca3ˉ formed less aggregation centers. The aca1ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ mutants combined individual defects, while aca2ˉaca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ additionally showed > 24 h delay in aggregation, with only few aggregates with fragmenting streams being formed. The fragments developed into small fruiting bodies with stalk and spore cells. Aggregation was restored in aca2ˉaca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ by 2.5 mM 8Br-cAMP, a membrane-permeant activator of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Like Ddis, Ppal sorogens also express the adenylate cyclases ACR and ACG. We found that prior to aggregation, Ddis acaˉ/ACG cells produced a pulse of cAMP upon stimulation with 2′H-cAMP, indicating that cAMP oscillations may not be dependent on ACA alone.

Conclusions

The three Ppal replicates of acaA perform different roles in stalk morphogenesis, secondary branch formation and aggregation, but act together to enable development by activating PKA. While even an aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant still forms (some) fruiting bodies, suggesting little need for ACA-induced cAMP oscillations in this process, we found that ACG also mediated transient cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation. It, therefore, remains likely that post-aggregative Ppal morphogenesis is organized by cAMP oscillations, favouring a previously proposed model, where cAR-regulated cAMP hydrolysis rather than its synthesis dominates oscillatory behaviour.

Background

Developing organisms need to coordinate cell differentiation with the generation of form. While differentiation largely results from regulation of gene expression, form can be generated by coordinated cell movement, cell division or changes in cell shape, either of which can act alone or in combination with others [1]. D. discoideum (Ddis) amoebas survive starvation by aggregating to form a migrating sorogen or slug, which turns into a fruiting body, consisting of spores and stalk cells. The chemotactic cell movements that cause aggregation as well as slug and fruiting body morphogenesis are organized by pulses of cAMP that are initially secreted by the most food-deprived cells and propagate as waves through the population by cAMP-induced cAMP synthesis [2,3,4]. The oscillating centre becomes the organizing tip of aggregates, slugs and fruiting bodies.

Dictyostelia can be subdivided into four major groups, with Ddis residing in group 4. The other group 4 species also use cAMP as chemoattractant [5] and are likely to use cAMP pulses to coordinate morphogenesis as well. However, this is not clear for species in the other three groups, which use the dipeptide glorin and other compounds as chemoattractant for aggregation [5,6,7,8,9]. Nevertheless, deletion of either cARs or PdsA from the group 2 species P. pallidum (Ppal) disorganized post-aggregative morphogenesis [10,11,12], while D. minutum in group 3 showed cAMP-induced cAMP synthesis and oscillatory cell movement only after aggregation [13, 14]. This suggested that non-group 4 species use cAMP oscillations to coordinate morphogenesis in the slug and fruiting body stage while using other chemoattractants for aggregation.

To test this hypothesis we deleted the three acaA homologs from Ppal individually and in combination. While single knock-outs in aca1, aca2 or aca3 showed subtle defects in primary stalk, side-branch formation and aggregation, respectively, triple aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells were very delayed in aggregation, but still formed some small fruiting bodies after a long delay. We explored whether other dictyostelid adenylate cyclases could also participate in pulsatile cAMP signalling.

Results

Spatio-temporal expression patterns of P. pallidum acaA homologs

In D. discoideum (Ddis), acaA shows complex expression from different promoters. The promoter proximal to the coding sequence directs high expression at the slug tip, the central promoter directs low expression in the prespore region, while the most distal promoter directs high expression during aggregation [15]. P. pallidum (Ppal) has three acaA genes, aca1, aca2 and aca3 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Comparative transcriptomics shows that these and other acaA genes across taxon groups are upregulated after starvation, with group 4 acaA genes showing peak expression during aggregation. Aca genes are most highly expressed in stalk cells in groups 1–3, but in group 4 expression is highest in cup cells, which are unique to group 4 (Additional File 1: Fig. S1).

To investigate the spatial expression pattern of Ppal aca1, aca2 and aca3, their promoter regions were fused to the LacZ reporter gene and transformed into Ppal cells. Developing structures were fixed and incubated with X-gal to visualize β-galactosidase activity. Aca1 was not expressed during aggregation and started to be expressed weakly at the utmost tip region of the primary sorogen, and later sometimes in the tip of secondary sorogens (Fig. 1A). Aca2 and aca3 were already expressed in streaming aggregates and more strongly during post-aggregative development (Fig. 1B, C). In primary sorogens, aca2 was expressed throughout the structure but most strongly at the tip region. Aca3 expression was more specific to the tips of primary and secondary sorogens. Overall, the post-aggregative expression pattern of the three Ppal acas resembles that of Ddis acaA with strongest expression at the sorogen tips [15, 16].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression patterns of P. pallidum aca genes. Ppal wild-type cells were transformed with gene fusions of the LacZ reporter and the intergenic regions upstream of the start-codon of the Ppal aca1, aca2 and aca3 genes. The cells were developed on NN agar until streaming aggregates (top), primary sorogens (centre) and secondary sorogens (bottom) had formed and intact structures were then fixed with glutaraldehyde and stained with X-gal. Bars: 0.1 mm

Deletion of aca genes in P. pallidum

To assess the biological roles of the three Ppal aca genes, we replaced essential regions in each gene with the LoxP-NeoR cassette, in which NeoR, the single selectable marker of Ppal is flanked by loxP sites (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The aca1ˉ clones aggregated normally and formed fruiting bodies with somewhat thinner and longer stalks than those of wild type Ppal (Fig. 2A, D). The aca2ˉ mutant aggregated and formed the primary sorogen normally but showed delayed formation of the first whorls of secondary sorogens (Fig. 2C). Such whorls arise at regular intervals when a posterior segment of the primary sorogen pinches off, while forming several regularly spaced tips, which each give rise to a small side branch. As a result, the branch-less lower stalk of aca2ˉ fruiting bodies was longer than in wild-type (Fig. 2D). The aca3ˉ mutant formed few aggregation centres with long streams (Fig. 2A), that partitioned into many tip-forming small aggregates that each gave rise to a small fruiting body. The central, large aca3ˉ aggregate produced a normal fruiting body (Fig. 2B, D). Overall, the phenotypes of single aca knock-out mutants were subtle. We tried to generate double and triple aca knock-outs by recycling the LoxP-NeoR cassette using the cre-recombinase expression vector pA15NLS.Cre [17]. This succeeded for the aca1ˉ mutant, allowing us to generate aca1ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ double knock-outs, but not for the aca2ˉ or aca3ˉ knock-outs. The aca1ˉaca3ˉ phenotype combined features of aca1ˉ and aca3ˉ knock-out mutants. Similar to aca3ˉ, aca1ˉaca3ˉ formed few but large streaming aggregates (Fig. 2A, B), while the fruiting bodies showed thinner and longer stalks, like the aca1ˉ mutants (Fig. 2D). The aca1ˉaca2ˉ cells aggregated and formed primary sorogens normally. However, the separation of the first whorl only occurred after 28 h of starvation, when WT, aca1ˉ, and aca2ˉ had already formed fruiting bodies (Fig. 2C). As a result, aca1ˉaca2ˉ made very tall fruiting bodies with side branches only at the upper stalk (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Development of single aca, aca1ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ mutants. Wild type (WT) Ppal and aca1ˉ, aca2ˉ, aca3ˉ, aca1ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ knock-outs were incubated at 22 °C on NN agar at 106 cells/cm2. A Aggregation: the images show aggregates after 6 h or 8 h (aca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ) of starvation. Bars: 1 mm. B Tip formation: aggregation streams of aca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ forming tips at 20 h. Bars: 1.0 mm. C Whorl mass separation: aca1ˉ, aca2ˉ and WT at 20 h and aca1ˉaca2ˉ at 28 h of starvation. Bars: 0.5 mm. D Fruiting bodies: WT, aca1ˉ, and aca2ˉ had formed mature fruiting bodies at 28 h of starvation, while aca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ took 32 h and aca1ˉaca2ˉ 48 h to complete their fruiting bodies. Bars: 0.5 mm

The failure to recycle LoxP-NeoR cassette of aca2ˉ or aca3ˉ mutants was probably due to limited selectability of cells transformed with pA15NLS.Cre with its G418 selection cassette. We found that Ppal growth is also inhibited by the antibiotic Nourseothricin. This allowed us to use a Cre-recombinase expression vector pDM1483 [18] with a Nourseotricin selection cassette to eliminate LoxP-NeoR from aca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ and to generate aca3ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ knock-outs.

Compared to wild-type, aca1ˉaca2ˉ, aca1ˉaca3ˉ and single aca knock-outs, which all initiated aggregation within 8 h of starvation, the aca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant only started to aggregate at 24 h or later (Fig. 3A). Only few aggregation foci were formed, which attracted very long aggregation streams. Starting from the initial (small) focus, mounds appeared at intervals within the streams, which each attracted downstream cells. Each of these mounds gave rise to a small, branched fruiting body, which, similar to aca2ˉ, showed a longer whorl-free lower stalk (Fig. 3B). The aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ phenotype combined features of the aca1ˉaca2ˉ and the aca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant. Similar to aca3ˉaca2ˉ, aggregation was much delayed with long streams appearing only after 24–48 h of starvation (Fig. 3A), which eventually broke up and gave rise to small fruiting bodies. These fruiting bodies showed delayed side-branch formation, like aca1ˉaca2ˉ (Fig. 3B). Staining of the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ stalk and spore cells with the cellulose dye Calcofluor showed that it formed a normal primary and secondary stalk and elliptical spores encapsulated in cellulose walls (Fig. 3C), and this was also the case for all other acaˉ mutants (not shown).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Development of aca3ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutants. A Aggregation: Ppal aca3ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ were starved on NN agar at 106 cells/cm2 on their own or mixed with 10% wild-type Ppal for the indicated time periods. Bar: 1 mm. B Fruiting bodies: the cells were developed into fruiting bodies, which were imaged in situ. Bars: 0.5 mm. C Spore and stalk cells: Ppal WT and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ fruiting bodies were transferred to 0.001% Calcofluor and imaged under phase contrast (left) and epifluorescence (right). Bar: 20 µm

To investigate whether the aggregation phenotypes of the aca3ˉaca2ˉ or aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutants were cell-autonomous, the mutants were developed as chimeras with wild-type cells. Introduction of 10% wild-type cells was sufficient to restore delayed aggregation of both mutants (Fig. 3A). The mixtures aggregated within 8 h of starvation-like wild-type cells, but still formed larger aggregation streams. In addition, the formation of secondary sorogens in aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ chimeras with wild-type was not as delayed as in aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ alone, resulting in formation of more normal fruiting bodies (Fig. 3B). These experiments show that the defects in aggregation and whorl separation of the acaˉ mutants are non-cell autonomous.

We also tested microcyst formation in aca knock-out mutants. Incubation with 0.2 M sorbitol for 24 h induced cyst formation in both wild type and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ to the same degree (Additional File 1: Fig. S3), indicating that the aca genes are not required for encystation.

Restoration of aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ aggregation by 8Br-cAMP.

The strongly reduced initiation of aggregation centres and extensive delay in aggregation of both the aca3ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ was unexpected, since Ppal does not use cAMP as attractant for aggregation, but most likely glorin [5, 9]. However, both Ddis and Ppal require PKA activity and, therefore, likely intracellular cAMP to develop competence for aggregation [19, 20]. To investigate whether lack of PKA activation due to the absence of intracellular cAMP cause the aggregation abnormalities in aca3ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ, aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells were developed on agar containing 2.5 mM 8Br-cAMP, a membrane-permeant PKA agonist. While without 8Br-cAMP cells had not yet started to aggregate after 24 h of starvation, the 8Br-cAMP treated cells initiated many aggregation centres and almost completed aggregation within 6 h (Fig. 4). The aggregates remained, however, blocked in the mound stage and did not form fruiting bodies. This was, however, also the case for most Ppal WT aggregates developed on 8Br-cAMP agar. These results show that the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ aggregation defect was likely caused by insufficient intracellular cAMP for PKA activation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of 8Br-cAMP on aggregation of aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells Ppal aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ and wild-type cells were incubated for 24 h on NN agar with and without 2.5 mM 8Br-cAMP and imaged in situ at the indicated timepoints. Bar: 1 mm

cAMP relay in Ppal and in Ddis aca-/ACG cells

Despite the loss of all ACA activity, the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells still made relatively normal fruiting bodies after a long delay. cAMP-induced excitation and adaptation of ACA underpins pulsatile cAMP signalling and wave propagation in Ddis [21, 22], with cAMP receptors (cARs) and extracellular cAMP phosphodiesterase (PdsA) as essential components to, respectively, detect secreted cAMP and to hydrolyse it between pulses [23,24,25]. From earlier findings that cAR or pdsA null mutants in Ppal were specifically defective in fruiting body morphogenesis [11, 12], we concluded that cAMP waves mediated this process as they do in Ddis [4]. The present data imply that this is either not the case, or that the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells have a means to compensate for loss of ACA activity.

To investigate whether Ppal also shows transient cAMP-induced cAR mediated accumulation of cAMP, we stimulated wild-type Ppal cells at different stages of development with the cAR agonist 2'H-cAMP in the presence of the PdsA inhibitor DTT [26]. Figure 5A shows that cells at all stages contain a basal level of 3–6 pmol cAMP/mg protein. Starving cells or cells from streaming aggregates showed none or marginal responses to 2'H-cAMP, while cells from tipped mounds showed a 5 pmol/mg protein increase in cAMP, which then levelled off. However, cells from dissociated sorogens showed transient increase that peaked after 3 min after stimulation at 11 pmol above basal levels and then decreased to 5 pmol. These data indicate that Ppal can relay a pulse of cAMP, but only after tips and sorogens have formed. In Ddis, which unlike Ppal also uses cAMP to aggregate, cAMP relay is highest at the aggregation stage [27]. We could not meaningfully measure 2'H-cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation in the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells, because only few aggregates are formed at different times, which then fragment and fairly rapidly mature into fruiting bodies. This means that at any time only a very small fraction of cells is in the sorogen stage.

Fig. 5
figure 5

cAMP relay in Ppal wild-type and Ddis acaˉ/ACG. A P. pallidum. Ppal WT was starved on agar for 4 h or until streaming aggregates, tipped mounds and aerially lifted sorogens had formed. Structures were gently dissociated, resuspended in PB to 108 cells/ml and stimulated at t = 0 min with 10 μM 2'H-cAMP and 5 mM DTT. Reactions were terminated with 1.75% perchloric acid at the indicated timepoints and cAMP was assayed by isotope dilution assay. B D. discoideum Vegetative WT AX3 and acaˉ/ACG cells, and cells starved on NN agar for 4 h were resuspended in PB to 108 cells/ml and stimulated with 5 μM 2'H-cAMP and 5 mM DTT in the presence and absence of 1 mM IPA. Reactions were terminated as above, and cAMP was assayed. Data were standardized to the protein content of the cell suspensions and represent means and SE of six experiments performed in triplicate for Ppal sorogens and two experiments in triplicate for other stages and cell lines. The experiments in panel B were performed twice more in triplicate with acaˉ/ACG cells in the absence of IPA, with similar results

Apart from Aca1, Aca2 and Aca3, two other adenylate cyclases, AcgA and AcrA are expressed in Ppal sorogens [28]. The experiment in Fig. 5A does not identify the adenylate cyclase responsible for the cAMP increase. While currently not feasible in Ppal, a Ddis acaA knock-out is available that expresses AcgA (ACG) from the constitutive actin 15 promoter [29]. During growth, this mutant synthesizes cAMP at a constant rate [30], but it is unknown whether cAMP synthesis comes under cAR regulation at a later stage. We compared 2'H-cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation between Ddis wild-type and acaˉ/ACG cells in vegetative and 4 h starved cells, which are just starting to aggregate. To validate that the observed responses are mediated by Ddis cAR1, we included the cAR1 antagonist 2′3′-O-isopropylidene adenosine (IPA) in control assays. Figure 5B shows that wild-type Ddis shows no 2'H-cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation in the vegetative stage and a 70 pmol/mg protein increase in 4 h starved cells that peaks at 5 min. This response is almost completely inhibited by IPA. Vegetative acaˉ/ACG cells show a steady increase in cAMP levels after addition of 2'H-cAMP/DTT that is only slightly reduced in the presence of IPA. However, 4 h starved acaˉ/ACG cells show a faster transient increase of cAMP that peaks at 3 min after 2′H-cAMP/DTT stimulation. This response is also strongly reduced by IPA. These data indicate that in early aggregating Ddis cells, ACG is also controlled by cAR stimulation. The apparent ability of other adenylate cyclases than ACA to participate in transient cAR mediated cAMP accumulation provides some resolution for the contrasting effects on Ppal fruiting body morphogenesis of aca deletion on one hand, and cAR or pdsA deletion on the other.

Discussion

Gene amplification of aca genes and their expression in P. pallidum

Representative species of the Dictyostelium taxon groups 1, 3 and 4 have a single gene each of the adenylate cyclases acaA, acrA and acgA, but in taxon group 2, the ancestral acaA gene was amplified twice in Ppal and three times in A. subglobosum (Additional File 1, Fig. S1). In Ddis, a signaling network that critically incorporates ACA, cAR1 and PdsA generates the cAMP pulses that coordinate aggregation and cell movement in the multicellular stage [24, 29]. Deletion of the two Ppal car genes, carA and carB, or its single pdsA gene had no effect on aggregation but disorganized the subsequent formation of sorogens and fruiting bodies [11, 12]. This suggested that similar to Ddis, Ppal multicellular morphogenesis is organized by cAMP pulses. The Ppal attractant for aggregation is likely the dipeptide glorin, since starving Ppal cells chemotactically respond to glorin [9] and their aggregation is disrupted by including glorin in the supporting agar [5].

We here show that Ppal aca1 was poorly expressed and only visible in the tips of primary and secondary sorogens, while aca2 and aca3 expression was already visible in aggregates. Both genes were preferentially expressed in tip and stalk cells, but aca2 was also expressed in prespore cells. The latter expression likely explains why double loss of acrA and acgA, which in Ddis leads to complete loss of prespore and spore differentiation [31], only mildly affects Ppal sporulation [20]. The post-aggregative expression pattern of either Ppal aca resembles that of Ddis acaA, which is also preferentially expressed in the organizing tip, from which the organizing cAMP waves emanate [4, 15, 16].

Ppal aca3 is required for PKA activation and early development

Deletion of individual Ppal aca genes caused subtle developmental defects (summarized in Table 1), with aca1ˉ displaying longer, thinner stalks, aca2ˉ delayed separation of the first whorl from the main sorogen and aca3ˉ showing delayed and reduced formation of aggregation centres, giving rise to extensive streaming (Fig. 2). Double aca1ˉaca2ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ knock-outs combined the phenotypes of the individual knock-outs, but aca3ˉaca2ˉ was very delayed in aggregation and like aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ only formed a few aggregates on an entire plate of cells. The latter mutant did, however, form small fruiting bodies with some whorls of side branches near the top after a very long delay (Fig. 3). Both the delayed aggregation and delayed secondary sorogen formation are non-cell autonomous defects as they are restored by chimeric development of the mutants with 10% wild-type cells.

Table 1 Phenotypes of Ppal aca knock-outs

The delay in aggregation caused by loss of aca3 was somewhat enigmatic, since no such delay occurred in Ppal carAˉcarBˉ or pdsAˉ mutants, which cannot detect or hydrolyse extracellular cAMP, respectively. Exposure of the aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant to the membrane-permeant PKA agonist 8Br-cAMP restored normal aggregation (Fig. 4) indicating that Aca3 provides cAMP for activation of PKA in early development. Because defective aggregation of aca3ˉ is also restored by wild-type cells, this likely means that PKA induces genes required for glorin synthesis. In early Ddis development PKA also acts to induce expression of aggregation genes [19].

The Ppal aca genes are not essential for post-aggregative morphogenesis

Despite its long delay in forming aggregates Ppal aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ cells were still able to form relatively normal fruiting bodies with stalk and spore cells. In view of observations that Ppal carAˉcarBˉ or pdsAˉ cells are highly defective in fruiting body morphogenesis, this suggests that perhaps a static gradient of cAMP produced by ACR or ACG is sufficient to organize morphogenesis or that either or both of these adenylate cyclases can also participate in an oscillatory network. When expressed from the constitutive A15 promoter in an acaˉ background, Ddis ACG displays a fairly high level of constitutive activity in the growth stage that is activated by high osmolarity [32]. In wild-type Ddis, ACG has an overlapping role with ACR in induction of spore formation and inhibition of spore germination [31, 33]. In Ppal ACG and ACR critically regulate encystation, but their role in sporulation is less pronounced [20], which may be due to the additional activity of Aca1, 2 and 3 in sorogens.

ACG mediates cAMP stimulated transient cAMP accumulation

Ppal cells at the sorogen stage show transient 2′HcAMP-induced cAMP synthesis (Fig. 5A), consolidating evidence from Ppal carˉ and pdsAˉ mutants that cAMP pulses coordinate postaggregative morphogenesis [11, 12], but the Ppal aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant still makes fruiting bodies, suggesting that this is not the case. To resolve this conundrum, we explored whether other adenylate cyclases might mediate pulsatile signaling. We found that when aggregation competent Ddis acaˉ/ACG cells are stimulated with 2′HcAMP, ACG mediates a transient accumulation of cAMP (Fig. 5B). Like ACA mediated transient cAMP synthesis, the response is inhibited by the cAR antagonist IPA, indicating that it is mediated by cARs. The experiment shows that at least one of the other dictyostelid adenylate cyclases could also give rise to oscillatory cAMP signalling, which provides some resolution to the conundrum.

How the apparent transient ACG activation occurs is unresolved. Oscillatory cAMP signalling depends on both positive and negative feedback loops acting on cAMP production (Fig. 6). ACA activation involves positive feedback loop, where cAMP synthesized by ACA process binds to cAR1 and initiates a multistep process that causes activation of ACA (see [34]. Negative feedback on ACA may involve PIP3, one of the activating intermediates, also causing inhibition of ACA after a delay [35]. In an alternative model (Fig. 6B), the positive feedback loop involves both cAMP activation of ACA, as above, and of the protein kinase ERK2, which next inactivates the intracellular cAMP phosphodiesterase RegA, enabling cAMP to increase. The negative loop involves PKA activation by cAMP synthesized by ACA, inactivation of ERK2 and thereby activation of RegA [36]. In this model it is mostly cAMP degradation that is under positive and negative feedback regulation, making it conceivable that a constitutively active adenylate cyclase-like ACG or ACR could still display apparent transient activation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Proposed models for ACA mediated oscillatory cAMP signalling See main text for explanation. Abbreviations: PdsA phosphodiesterase A, cAR1 cAMP receptor 1, G2: heterotrimeric G-protein 2, RasC small GTPase C, PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PIP3 phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate, CRAC cytosolic regulator of adenylate cyclase, ACA adenylate cyclase A, ERK2 extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2, RegA cAMP phosphodiesterase with response regulator, PKA cAMP dependent protein kinase. Schematics are based on Fig. 6 in [35] and Fig. 2 in [36]

Conclusions

In Ddis, cAMP waves produced by ACA and emanating from aggregation centres and organizing tips control both aggregation and post-aggregative morphogenesis. We here investigated ACA function in Ppal, which likely uses glorin for aggregation. Ppal has 3 aca genes, which similar to Ddis aca are most highly expressed in the organizing tip. Deletion of either gene causes different but relatively subtle changes in aggregation and post-aggregative morphogenesis, while deletion of all three aca genes causes a long delay in aggregation with only few centres being formed that attracted long streams of amoebas. The fragmenting streams eventually gave rise to small fruiting bodies. Timely aggregation was restored by including the PKA agonist 8Br-cAMP in the substratum, indicating that in early development the Ppal ACAs are needed to activate PKA.

While the formation of fruiting bodies by the Ppal aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ mutant argues against a role for ACAs and thereby oscillatory cAMP signalling in fruiting body morphogenesis, several lines of evidence indicate the opposite. 1. Loss of other components that are essential for cAMP oscillations, such as cARs or pdsA disorganizes morphogenesis. 2. Post-aggregative Ppal cells produce a cAMP pulse when stimulated with 2′H-cAMP, a cAMP receptor agonist. 3. In Ddis other adenylate cyclases, such as ACG also mediate transient 2′H-cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation, at a stage when cARs and PdsA are also present.

Overlapping roles of ACG and ACR were detected in Ddis sporulation [31] and Ppal encystation, while the Ppal ACAs were proposed to overlap with ACG and ACR in induction of sporulation [20]. The current study provides hints that ACG and possibly ACR in turn overlap with ACA in morphogenetic signalling. Altogether, ACA, ACG and ACR may ancestrally have been less specialized and acquired their specific roles in the course of dictyostelid evolution by expression in different cell types and interaction with proteins specific to that cell type.

Methods

Growth and development.

P. pallidum PN500 (Ppal) was routinely grown in association with Escherichia coli on LP agar or 1/5th SM agar (Formedium, UK). For multicellular development, cells were harvested in 20 mM K-phosphate, pH 6.5 (KK2), washed free from bacteria and incubated at 106 cells/cm2 and 22 °C on NN agar (1.5% agar in 8.8 mM KH2PO4 and 2.7 mM Na2HPO4) until the desired developmental stages had been reached. D. discoideum (Ddis) AX3 and acaˉ/ACG cells [29] were grown in HL5 axenic medium, which was supplemented with 20 μg/ml G418 for acaˉ/ACG.

DNA constructs and transformation

Ppal Aca promoter-lacZ constructs and analysis

To construct a gene fusion of the Ppal aca1 promoter and lacZ, an aca1 (PPL_01657) fragment 3511 nt upstream and 93 nt downstream of the start ATG was amplified from Ppal gDNA using primers Pp-ACA1-P52X with XbaI site and Pp-ACA1-P32. The fragment was digested with XbaI and BamHI (using an internal BamHI site) and ligated into the BglII/XbaI digested pDdGal17 [37], yielding pPpACA1-LacZ. The aca2 (PPL_12370) 3.8 kb 5'intergenic region (− 3743 to + 86) was amplified using primers Pp-ACA2-P51E and Pp-ACA2-P31B that harbour EcoRI and BamHI, respectively. The EcoRI/BamHI digested PCR product was ligated into the EcoRI/BglII digested pDdGal16 [37], yielding vector pPpACA2-LacZ. The aca3 (PPL_10658) 2.6 kb 5′ intergenic region (− 2502 to + 50) was amplified using primers Pp-ACA3-P52X and Pp-ACA3-P32B that harbour XbaI and BamHI, respectively. The XbaI/BamHI digested PCR product was ligated into similarly digested pDdGal17, yielding vector pPpACA3-LacZ. After validation of the plasmids by DNA sequencing, they were transformed into Ppal wild-type cells. Transformants were selected at 300 µg/ml G418 [38] and pools of 7–10 transformed clones were developed into multicellular structures on dialysis membrane, supported by NN agar. β-galactosidase activity was visualized with X-gal in the structures, as described previously [11, 39].

Ppal gene knock-out constructs

To disrupt Ppal aca1 (PPL_01657), an aca1 fragment was amplified from Ppal PN500 genomic DNA using primers Pp-ACA-51H and Pp-ACA-31B (Additional file 1: Table S1) that harbour HindIII and BamHI restriction sites, respectively. The fragment was cloned into BamHI/HindIII digested pBluescript SK +  which was next digested with EcoRV. The LoxP-NeoR cassette of pLoxNeoIII [12] was excised with BamHI and HindIII, filled in with Klenow polymerase, and ligated into the EcoRV digested aca1 plasmid, yielding vectors pACA1-KO1 and pACA1-KO2, with loxP-NeoR inserted in aca1 in forward and reverse orientation, respectively, and flanked by 2307 bp 5′UTR and 5’aca1 sequence and 1414 bp 3’aca1 sequence (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A). pACA1-KO2 was used for gene disruption.

To disrupt Ppal aca2 (PPL_12370), an aca2 fragment was amplified using primers Pp-ACA2-51 K and Pp-ACA2-31S (Additional file 1: Table S1) that harbour KpnI and SacI sites, respectively. The fragment was cloned into KpnI/SacI digested pBluescript SK +  which was next digested with BamHI/SalI. LoxP-NeoR was excised with BamHI/SalI from pLoxNeoIII and ligated into the BamHI/SalI digested aca2 plasmid, yielding vector pACA2-KO with LoxP-NeoR flanked by 1918 bp 5’aca2 sequence and 3086 bp 3′aca2 and 3′UTR sequence (Additional file 1: Fig. S2B).

To disrupt Ppal aca3 (PPL_10658), two aca3 sequences, A and B, were amplified using primer pair Pp-ACA3-51 K/Pp-ACA3-31X, that harbour KpnI and XbaI sites for A and primer pair Pp-ACA3-52B/Pp-ACA3-32X with BamHI and XbaI sites for B, respectively. Fragment A was digested with KpnI/SalI (using an internal SalI site) and inserted into KpnI/SalI digested pLox-NeoIII, and next BamHI/XbaI digested fragment B was inserted into the BamHI/XbaI sites of the resulting vector, yielding pACA3-KO with 2042 bp 5′ aca3 sequence and 2531 bp 3’ aca3 and 3’UTR sequence. (Additional file 1: Fig. S2C).

Ppal cells were transformed by electroporation with the linearized vectors according to established procedures [38]. Genomic DNA was isolated from G418 resistant clones and analyzed by PCR and Southern blots to diagnose gene disruption by homologous recombination (Additional file 1: Fig. S2).

To generate double aca1ˉaca2ˉ or aca1ˉaca3ˉ knock-outs, the loxP-NeoR cassette was removed from aca1ˉ by transient transformation with pA15NLS.Cre [17]. Cells that had regained sensitivity to G418 were then transformed with the pACA2-KO or pACA3-KO plasmids. This strategy did not work for the aca2ˉ and aca3ˉ knockouts. To generate an aca3ˉaca2ˉ double and aca1ˉaca3ˉaca2ˉ triple knockout, aca3ˉ and aca1ˉaca3ˉ were transformed with pDM1483 [18], which harbours cassettes for Nourseothricin selection and cre-recombinase expression. Transformants were selected after growth for 3–5 days in the presence of 300 µg/ml Nourseothricin, and, after replica-plating, selected for G418 sensitivity and transformed with the pACA2-KO vector. All gene knock-outs were diagnosed by PCR and/or Southern blot (Additional file 1: S2).

cAMP relay assays

To measure cAMP-induced cAMP accumulation, Ppal cells were resuspended in PB (10 mM Na/K-phosphate, pH 6.5) at 108 cells/ml, dispensed as 25 μl aliquots in microplate wells and, stimulated with 5 μl of 60 μM 2'H-cAMP (2′-deoxyadenosine 3′:5′-cyclic monophosphate, Sigma-Aldrich, in 30 mM DTT (dithiothreitol, Sigma-Aldrich) and shaken at 100 rpm and 21 °C. Reactions were terminated by addition of 30 μl of 3.5% (v/v) perchloric acid. Ddis cells additionally received 3 μl of 10 mm IPA (2′,3′-O-isopropylideneadenosine, Sigma-Aldrich) in 10% (v/v) (DMSO) dimethylsulfoxide, Sigma-Aldrich) or 3 μl 10% DMSO (controls) and were stimulated with 3 μl 50 μM 2′H-cAMP in 50 mM DTT. For cAMP assay, samples were neutralized by addition of 15 μl of 50% saturated KHCO3 and 75 μl of cAMP assay buffer (4 mM EDTA in 150 mM K phosphate, pH 7.5). Protein and perchlorate were precipitated by centrifugation for 5 min at 2000 ×g and cAMP was assayed in 50 μl of supernatant by isotope dilution assay using purified PKA regulatory subunit from beef heart as cAMP-binding protein and [2,8-3H]cAMP (Perkin–Elmer) as competitor [26, 40].

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and Additional file 1. The DNA constructs and knock-out cell lines produced in the study will be deposited in the Dictyostelium Stock Centre http://dictybase.org/StockCenter/StockCenter.html

References

  1. Montell DJ. Morphogenetic cell movements: diversity from modular mechanical properties. Science. 2008;322(5907):1502–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dinauer MC, MacKay SA, Devreotes PN. Cyclic 3’,5’-AMP relay in Dictyostelium discoideum III The relationship of cAMP synthesis and secretion during the cAMP signaling response. JCell Biol. 1980;86:537–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang M, Aerts RJ, Spek W, Schaap P. Cell cycle phase in Dictyostelium discoideum is correlated with the expression of cyclic AMP production, detection, and degradation. DevBiol. 1988;125:410–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singer G, Araki T, Weijer CJ. Oscillatory cAMP cell-cell signalling persists during multicellular Dictyostelium development. Commun Biol. 2019;2:139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Romeralo M, Skiba A, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Schilde C, Lawal H, Kedziora S, Cavender JC, Glockner G, Urushihara H, Schaap P. Analysis of phenotypic evolution in dictyostelia highlights developmental plasticity as a likely consequence of colonial multicellularity. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280(1764):20130976.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimomura O, Suthers HLB, Bonner JT. Chemical identity of the acrasin of the cellular slime mold Polysphondylium violaceum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:7376–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. De Wit RJW, Konijn TM. Identification of the acrasin of Dictyostelium minutum as a derivative of folic acid. Cell Differ. 1983;12:205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Haastert PJM, De Wit RJW, Grijpma Y, Konijn TM. Identification of a pterin as the acrasin of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium lacteum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:6270–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Asghar A, Groth M, Siol O, Gaube F, Enzensperger C, Glockner G, Winckler T. Developmental gene regulation by an ancient intercellular communication system in social amoebae. Protist. 2011;163:25–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawabe Y, Kuwayama H, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y. A putative serpentine receptor gene tasA required for normal morphogenesis of primary stalk and branch structure in Polysphondylium pallidum. Gene. 2002;285(1–2):291–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawabe Y, Morio T, James JL, Prescott AR, Tanaka Y, Schaap P. Activated cAMP receptors switch encystation into sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(17):7089–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawabe Y, Weening KE, Marquay-Markiewicz J, Schaap P. Evolution of self-organisation in dictyostelia by adaptation of a non-selective phosphodiesterase and a matrix component for regulated cAMP degradation. Development. 2012;139(7):1336–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaap P, Konijn TM, Van Haastert PJM. cAMP pulses coordinate morphogenetic movement during fruiting body formation of Dictyostelium minutum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:2122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaap P. cAMP relay during early culmination of Dictyostelium minutum. Differentiation. 1985;28:205–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Galardi-Castilla M, Garciandia A, Suarez T, Sastre L. The Dictyostelium discoideum acaA gene is transcribed from alternative promoters during aggregation and multicellular development. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10): e13286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Verkerke-van Wijk I, Fukuzawa M, Devreotes PN, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase A expression is tip-specific in Dictyostelium slugs and directs StatA nuclear translocation and CudA gene expression. Dev Biol. 2001;234(1):151–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Faix J, Kreppel L, Shaulsky G, Schleicher M, Kimmel AR. A rapid and efficient method to generate multiple gene disruptions in Dictyostelium discoideum using a single selectable marker and the Cre-loxP system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(19): e143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Paschke P, Knecht DA, Williams TD, Thomason PA, Insall RH, Chubb JR, Kay RR, Veltman DM. Genetic engineering of Dictyostelium discoideum cells based on selection and growth on bacteria. J Vis Exp Jove. 2019;143:58981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schulkes C, Schaap P. cAMP-dependent protein kinase activity is essential for preaggegative gene expression in Dictyostelium. FEBS Lett. 1995;368:381–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawabe Y, Schilde C, Du Q, Schaap P. A conserved signalling pathway for amoebozoan encystation that was co-opted for multicellular development. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dinauer MC, Steck TL, Devreotes PN. Cyclic 3’,5’-AMP relay in Dictyostelium discoideum V adaptation of the cAMP signaling response during cAMP stimulation. J Cell Biol. 1980;86:554–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomchik KJ, Devreotes PN. Adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate waves in Dictyostelium discoideum: a demonstration by isotope dilution-fluorography. Science. 1981;212:443–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaughan R, Pupillo M, Theibert A, Klein P, Devreotes P. Surface receptor mediated activation and adaptation of adenylate cyclase in Dictyostelium discoideum. In: Konijn TM, editor. Molecular mechanisms of desensitization to signal molecules NATO ASI series. 6th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun TJ, Van Haastert PJM, Devreotes PN. Surface cAMP receptors mediate multiple responses during development in Dictyostelium: evidenced by antisense mutagenesis. JCell Biol. 1990;110:1549–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sucgang R, Weijer CJ, Siegert F, Franke J, Kessin RH. Null mutations of the Dictyostelium cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase gene block chemotactic cell movement in developing aggregates. Dev Biol. 1997;192:181–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alvarez-Curto E, Weening KE, Schaap P. Pharmacological profiling of the Dictyostelium adenylate cyclases ACA. ACB and ACG Biochem J. 2007;401(1):309–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kesbeke F, Van Haastert PJM, Schaap P. Cyclic AMP relay and cyclic AMP-induced cyclic GMP accumulation during development of Dictyostelium discoideum. FEMS MicrobiolLett. 1986;34:85–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gloeckner G, Lawal HM, Felder M, Singh R, Singer G, Weijer CJ, Schaap P. The multicellularity genes of dictyostelid social amoebas. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pitt GS, Milona N, Borleis J, Lin KC, Reed RR, Devreotes PN. Structurally distinct and stage-specific adenylyl cyclase genes play different roles in Dictyostelium development. Cell. 1992;69:305–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saran S, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase G is activated by an intramolecular osmosensor. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(3):1479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Alvarez-Curto E, Saran S, Meima M, Zobel J, Scott C, Schaap P. cAMP production by adenylyl cyclase G induces prespore differentiation in Dictyostelium slugs. Development. 2007;134(5):959–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Es S, Virdy KJ, Pitt GS, Meima M, Sands TW, Devreotes PN, Cotter DA, Schaap P. Adenylyl cyclase G, an osmosensor controlling germination of Dictyostelium spores. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:23623–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Soderbom F, Anjard C, Iranfar N, Fuller D, Loomis WF. An adenylyl cyclase that functions during late development of Dictyostelium. Development. 1999;126:5463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kriebel PW, Parent CA. Adenylyl cyclase expression and regulation during the differentiation of Dictyostelium discoideum. IUBMB Life. 2004;56(9):541–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Comer FI, Parent CA. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity controls the chemoattractant-mediated activation and adaptation of adenylyl cyclase. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(1):357–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Maeda M, Lu S, Shaulsky G, Miyazaki Y, Kuwayama H, Tanaka Y, Kuspa A, Loomis WF. Periodic signaling controlled by an oscillatory circuit that includes protein kinases ERK2 and PKA. Science. 2004;304(5672):875–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harwood AJ, Drury L. New vectors for expression of the E.coli lacZ gene in Dictyostelium. Nucl Acids Res. 1990;18:4292–4292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kawabe Y, Enomoto T, Morio T, Urushihara H, Tanaka Y. LbrA, a protein predicted to have a role in vesicle trafficking, is necessary for normal morphogenesis in Polysphondylium pallidum. Gene. 1999;239(1):75–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dingermann T, Reindl N, Werner H, Hildebrandt M, Nellen W, Harwood A, Williams J, Nerke K. Optimization and in situ detection of Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. Gene. 1989;85:353–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gilman AG. Protein binding assays for cyclic nucleotides. Adv Cyc Nuc Res. 1972;2:9–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by BBSRC grant BB/K000799/1 and ERC grant 74228. The BBSRC and ERC grants were used at initial and later phases of the work to fund the salary of YK and the materials to carry out the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YK and PS designed the study, YK performed most experimental work, analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PS supervised the work, performed the cAMP relay experiments and prepared the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline Schaap.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. acaA genes across Dictyostelia. Figure S2. Schematics and diagnosis of Ppal aca1, aca2 and aca3 knock-outs. Figure S3. Encystation. Table S1. Oligonucleotide primers used in this work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawabe, Y., Schaap, P. Adenylate cyclase A amplification and functional diversification during Polyspondylium pallidum development. EvoDevo 13, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-022-00203-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-022-00203-7

Keywords

  • Excitable systems
  • CAMP oscillations
  • Adenylate cyclase A
  • Coordinated cell migration
  • Cell aggregation
  • Morphogenetic movement
  • Dictyostelia